IRC log for #koha, 2008-09-11

All times shown according to UTC.

Time S Nick Message
13:19 Amit any one tried koha on RPM
13:19 Amit base linux
13:19 Amit or production of koha on RPM based linux
13:20 Amit i have done this for delhi public library delhi, india
13:28 acmoore Amit: it seems that it's common to install Koha on Fedora. Is that RPM based?
13:28 Amit yes
13:28 Amit fedora is only for testing
13:28 Amit not on production
13:29 Amit i m using centos5.2
13:29 acmoore oh. If you have installation tips or help for that, I'm sure they would be welcome. We can make an INSTALL.centos document in the distribution.
13:31 Amit ok
13:31 Amit i am adding new search with zebra
13:31 Amit on indian languages
13:33 paul Amit : why do you say "fedora is for testing only" ?
13:34 paul there are stable fedora as well
13:34 Amit because fedora is redhat product
13:34 Amit and release for only
13:34 Amit testing purposes
13:36 Amit r u using fedora
13:37 paul Amit: no, sorry (debian, ubuntu, mandriva, some mac OSX, a few RH, but no centOS)
13:37 Amit centos is also
13:37 Amit RPM based linux
13:37 Amit i have tried also on openlx linux
13:37 Amit which is indian linux
13:38 mc paul, i think Amit means there is no commercial support on fedora
13:38 Amit yes
13:38 mc there are stable releases
13:38 mc but for non-professionnal users only
13:38 Amit our company provide support on koha on centos
13:38 Amit for delhi public library delhi
13:38 mc (as rpm based aren't professionnal ;) )
13:38 Amit india
13:38 Amit why??
13:38 mc Amit, just kidding
13:39 Amit k
13:39 mc i don't like them
13:39 mc but i don't troll about it
13:39 Amit but i like RPM based linux
13:39 Amit :)
13:39 mason rpm/redhat gave me years of dependency headaches
13:39 mc you're welcome
13:39 mc mason++
13:40 johnny ++
13:40 mc too many failed major upgrade
13:40 mc s
13:40 Amit this is your way
13:40 Amit but i m comfortable with RPM based linux
13:40 Amit so easy for me
13:41 Amit to configure koha on RPM based linux
13:41 Amit i have already done for delhi public library
13:41 Amit with zebra searching
13:41 mc never used debian ? :))
13:42 paul Amit: mc & johnny are true geeks, with a long beard. don't follow them in their trolls ;-)
13:42 Amit ok
13:42 mc paul, :-P
13:42 Amit oh! sir no problem
13:43 Amit this is discussion
13:43 Amit i have also done koha on debian
13:43 Amit only one time
13:43 Amit for testing purpose only
13:43 Amit mc
13:44 mc ok
13:55 Amit good night
13:55 Amit :)
13:55 Amit list
14:21 danny hello #koha
14:30 brendan morning danny
16:56 owen gmcharlt around?
16:59 gmcharlt hi owen
16:59 owen Hi.
17:00 owen I'm still thinking about vs.
17:00 owen Now I'm thinking we may need to keep them both. is really an item-level report, while is a bib-level one.
17:01 gmcharlt agreed
17:02 gmcharlt still presents possibilities for better naming and presenting the two types of reports
17:03 owen Differentiating the two I think is necessary, since right now the link to bookcount says "circulation history" and the link to issuehistory says "checkout history"
17:36 atz Should probably be "Circulation History (item level)" and "Circulation History (biblio level)"
19:07 owen git question: what's the best way to tell how your current branch differs from the main repo?
19:07 owen diff only tells you about what isn't committed
20:03 gmcharlt owen: you can do git diff <branch-name>
20:03 gmcharlt git-diff is a full service tool; diffs of uncomitted changes is just its default mode
22:01 hdl atz: around ?
22:01 atz ?
22:01 hdl hi
22:01 atz hello
22:01 hdl sorry to bother you.
22:01 hdl how are you ?
22:01 atz pretty good
22:02 atz what's up?
22:24 chris hmm
22:24 gmcharlt hi chris
22:26 chris heya gmcharlt
22:26 chris hows things?
22:26 gmcharlt ok
22:27 gmcharlt in  class actually
22:27 gmcharlt subject to vagaries of net connection :)
22:27 chris ahh :)
03:39 Amit hi
03:39 Amit koha
06:53 Amit Hi
06:53 Amit #koha

Channels | #koha index | Today | | Search | Google Search | Plain-Text | plain, newest first | summary