Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
11:09 |
|
Elwell |
Stupid Q - SIP2 in the koha sense isn't the same as SIP in the VoIP sense right? |
11:09 |
|
Elwell |
'''''''''''''';;'' |
11:10 |
|
Elwell |
ah,found the 3M document |
23:05 |
|
SelfishMan |
"my company emailaddresses on the Bayesian spam filter black list." |
23:05 |
|
SelfishMan |
oops, wrong channel |
23:17 |
|
mason |
for the NZ viewers -> http://wellingtonista.com/wait[…]kend-venn-diagram |
03:29 |
|
Amit |
hi good morning koha |
03:30 |
|
Amit |
hi mason good morning |
05:15 |
|
mason |
hiya amit |
05:15 |
|
Amit |
hi mason |
05:15 |
|
Amit |
how is your weekend |
05:16 |
|
mason |
very good thanks |
05:16 |
|
Amit |
enjoying cricket NZ vs Aus |
07:18 |
|
Elwell |
heh. Love the venn diagram |
07:18 |
|
mc |
hello world |
07:27 |
|
chris |
hi mc |
07:28 |
|
Elwell |
Stupid Q - is it possible to use zebra for log parsing? kinda like splunk? |
07:28 |
|
Elwell |
(yes I know its not terribly koha related) |
07:30 |
|
chris |
you could |
07:30 |
|
chris |
there's a bunch of tools that would probably do a lot better job though |
07:33 |
|
chris |
with a lot less effort :) |
07:35 |
|
Elwell |
:-) |
07:35 |
|
Elwell |
wasnt sure how optimised zebra was |
07:38 |
|
chris |
its very fast at searching |
07:40 |
|
chris |
but you need to set up documents describing how your data is structured and what indices you want to build |
07:41 |
|
chris |
so you would need to set that up for you logfiles |
07:42 |
|
chris |
and querying your logfiles via Z39.50 or sru/sw just doesnt seem like a lot of fun :) |
07:43 |
|
SelfishMan |
Although it is a rather geeky way to do it |
07:44 |
|
SelfishMan |
Just don't Z39.50 enable a Furby to query your logfiles because that's just going too far |
07:44 |
|
chris |
no one should use Z39.50 unless they have to ;) |
07:48 |
|
HARE9 |
good morning |
07:51 |
|
chris |
hi hare9 |
07:59 |
|
Amit |
hi hare9 |
07:59 |
|
Amit |
hi chirs have u check reading level in koha3 |
07:59 |
|
Amit |
sory chris |
08:02 |
|
chris |
what do you mean? |
08:03 |
|
Amit |
i mean to say http://lists.katipo.co.nz/publ[…]/2006/010884.html |
08:03 |
|
Amit |
this one for koha 3 |
08:13 |
|
chris |
i havent done it, but it might work, you would have to edit the zebra config |
08:14 |
|
chris |
hi paul |
08:14 |
|
paul_p |
hi chris |
08:14 |
|
Amit |
k |
08:15 |
|
paul_p |
& hi amit (& anyone else on this channel) |
08:15 |
|
Amit |
hi paul |
08:16 |
|
kf |
amit: perhaps this is the way to do it in 3.0: http://lists.katipo.co.nz/publ[…]tober/015763.html |
08:17 |
|
Amit |
k |
08:18 |
|
Amit |
thanks hope it will help |
08:20 |
|
kf |
did not try it yet, but i will need a new search option for our accession numbers |
08:20 |
|
Amit |
k |
09:42 |
|
kf |
hi there, i have a question: my colleague asked me, if its better to have a separate mysql-server. how do you handle that? |
09:42 |
|
paul_p |
is it better ? it just depends on your needs. |
09:43 |
|
paul_p |
if you have a dedicated mySQL server (with specific DB-tuning & backups & ...), then it's a good idea. |
09:43 |
|
paul_p |
the easiest way to do that is : |
09:43 |
|
chris |
and a fast network |
09:43 |
|
paul_p |
* install koha on a single server |
09:43 |
|
chris |
if your network is slow, then doing all the db work over the network is a big performance kill |
09:44 |
|
paul_p |
* modify the koha_conf.xml to link mysql from localhost to xxx.yyy.zzz.ttt |
09:44 |
|
paul_p |
or, if you install koha for the 1st time, you can, during configure, specify the address of the mySQL server |
09:44 |
|
kf |
util now, we have koha as vmware on one server, but we will probably host koha for more than one library |
09:45 |
|
chris |
you definitely wont want to run it under vmware in production |
09:45 |
|
paul_p |
chris: why ? |
09:45 |
|
chris |
emulation is always slower |
09:46 |
|
kf |
we do that for many applications atm, is the difference great? |
09:47 |
|
kf |
our koha seems ok for me, but the only person using it is me of course |
09:48 |
|
kf |
paul: do you use a separate server for your installations? or just a single server? |
09:48 |
|
chris |
paul: its also one more thing that can go wrong, and you end up supporting 2 OS's on the machine instead of one |
09:49 |
|
chris |
i can understand it for local applications |
09:50 |
|
paul_p |
chris: I agree with your ideas here. & we just use 1 server for our hosted koha |
09:50 |
|
paul_p |
in fact, we have 1 server, with vserver & 2 "vserver" machines : one for production one for testing |
09:51 |
|
paul_p |
vserser is not full virtualization. |
09:51 |
|
chris |
i usually do that with xen |
09:51 |
|
chris |
yeah we use vservers a lot at work |
09:51 |
|
kf |
ok, one more question. how to handle multiple koha installation? |
09:51 |
|
kf |
ah |
09:52 |
|
paul_p |
kf: we have developed some tools to help having multiple koha installations on the same server. |
09:52 |
|
kf |
vservers? |
09:52 |
|
chris |
you can do it the vserver, or xen etc |
09:52 |
|
chris |
or you can do it with multiple dbs and config files |
09:52 |
|
paul_p |
kf: we use vserver just for separating production & testing |
09:52 |
|
chris |
i currently have 6 koha's running on my server at home |
09:53 |
|
paul_p |
all our productions instances are on the same vserver. |
09:53 |
|
chris |
just with different databases and config files, but all using the same perl |
09:53 |
|
paul_p |
& the same Koha, chris is right |
09:53 |
|
kf |
i think i will need at least three - koha production, koha for training and one to test new versions |
09:53 |
|
paul_p |
then, it's different than what we have. |
09:53 |
|
paul_p |
for that, I suggest to have different VM |
09:54 |
|
paul_p |
just an example : I did an update at SAN-OP, and got a problem due to perl Text::CVS_XS, that has changed ! |
09:54 |
|
paul_p |
(it use to encode files depending on locale, now it's latin1 if my investigations are correct) |
09:55 |
|
paul_p |
so, you need to have 2 or 3 completely differents environments |
09:56 |
|
kf |
what about local changes in templates? i will try to avoid it... but we will at least need a special search option for inventory numbers |
09:57 |
|
kf |
if you have just one koha for several installations its everywhere then, right? |
09:58 |
|
kf |
sorry, paul, i think i understand now |
10:01 |
|
chris |
i normally have a development, a staging and a production server |
10:01 |
|
paul_p |
chris: yes, and that can be virtual machines imo |
10:02 |
|
chris |
the production server could do both training and live |
10:02 |
|
chris |
(have 2 koha's on it) |
10:02 |
|
paul_p |
chris: ++ |
10:02 |
|
chris |
staging is for testing |
10:02 |
|
chris |
and development is where you make your new templates etc |
10:03 |
|
chris |
often my staging box is a separate machine, and i run replication from the production box to it |
10:04 |
|
kf |
what about more than one production systems for different libraries? |
10:04 |
|
chris |
they would be on your production machine (or virtual machine) |
10:05 |
|
chris |
and that would be the machine you backup obsessively :) |
10:05 |
|
chris |
nothing helps you sleep better than reliable backups :) |
10:06 |
|
chris |
another option |
10:06 |
|
chris |
is using amazon's ec2 |
10:07 |
|
chris |
where you just spark up another instance (from your koha image) for each production system |
10:08 |
|
chris |
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/ |
10:24 |
|
kf |
back, had a support emergency here - you always help chris |
10:24 |
|
kf |
but im not sure if i understand it right |
10:24 |
|
kf |
ok, you dont recommend a separate mysql-server due to performance reasons, is this right? |
10:25 |
|
chris |
it depends on your network |
10:25 |
|
kf |
and its possible to have more than one koha installation on one server, with different conf-files? |
10:25 |
|
chris |
if its 100 |
10:25 |
|
chris |
Mbit (or better) |
10:25 |
|
kf |
ok |
10:25 |
|
chris |
then a machine tuned just to be a database server can help with performance |
10:26 |
|
chris |
it its slower, then the performance gain can be offset by network lag |
10:27 |
|
chris |
and yes you can have multiple koha's running on the same server |
10:28 |
|
kf |
we just start thinking about the best infrastructure for the production system |
10:29 |
|
chris |
ive done it both ways before (separate mysql machine and with mysql on the same machine) |
10:30 |
|
chris |
generally a webserver and a database server will compete for the same scarce resources (ram and cpu) |
10:30 |
|
paul_p |
kf: how many items in your catalogue ? |
10:30 |
|
chris |
so if its high usage, seperating them can be a good idea |
10:30 |
|
chris |
the nice thing is |
10:30 |
|
chris |
you can always start with them on the same server |
10:31 |
|
chris |
then shift it and change the config et voila ;) |
10:31 |
|
chris |
:) |
10:31 |
|
kf |
about 50.000 for our first library |
10:32 |
|
kf |
but some other libraries are also interested, so we have to think about more than one production system |
10:33 |
|
kf |
chris: your french is better than mine ;) |
10:33 |
|
paul_p |
kf: with 50 000 items, you don't need to care of having 2 separate servers imo ! |
10:33 |
|
chris |
paul has heard me try to speak it, he may disagree :) |
10:33 |
|
chris |
yes, with 50,000 one will be fine |
10:35 |
|
kf |
but i think it would be easier to backup one db-server, instad of several mysql-instances in different vms? |
10:35 |
|
kf |
the question is about performance then i think, but that should not be a big problem when the network is fast enough |
10:36 |
|
chris |
ok, i should go to sleep |
10:37 |
|
paul_p |
sweet dreams chris |
10:39 |
|
kf |
sweet dreams chris |
10:39 |
|
kf |
and thx |
10:40 |
|
kf |
and thx paul, i will have to discuss this with my colleague, wo is responsible for the servers |
10:41 |
|
kf |
perhaps i will send him here next time :) |