| Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
| 17:02 |
|
kados |
@tell |
| 17:02 |
|
kados |
dewey: @tell |
| 17:02 |
|
dewey |
kados: sorry... |
| 17:02 |
|
kados |
dewey: ? |
| 17:02 |
|
dewey |
kados: wish i knew |
| 17:02 |
|
kados |
dewey: help |
| 20:11 |
|
kados |
!tell |
| 20:11 |
|
kados |
@tell |
| 20:11 |
|
kados |
dewey: !tell |
| 20:11 |
|
dewey |
kados: excuse me? |
| 20:11 |
|
kados |
dewey: tell |
| 20:11 |
|
dewey |
kados: what? |
| 20:35 |
|
rach |
howdy |
| 20:35 |
|
dewey |
hi, rach |
| 20:35 |
|
rach |
how are you dewey? |
| 02:46 |
|
osmoze |
hello |
| 08:33 |
|
kados |
hey owen |
| 08:33 |
|
owen |
G'morning |
| 09:28 |
|
owen |
Bugzilla needs help |
| 09:51 |
|
kados |
yea? |
| 10:15 |
|
owen |
When I go to http://bugs.koha.org, it says "I think you are looking for index.cgi" |
| 10:16 |
|
owen |
And then redirects. But ever since the upgrade Bugzilla has had no style. |
| 10:16 |
|
owen |
And when I put in a search term under "Enter a bug # or some search terms:" it tells me I've entered an invalid bug number |
| 10:25 |
|
kados |
paul are you around? |
| 10:26 |
|
kados |
paul_away: having trouble with the .po translation system |
| 10:28 |
|
kados |
paul_away: i get a bunch of errors: |
| 10:28 |
|
kados |
Strange line in po/npl_opac_hu_HU.po: |
| 10:28 |
|
kados |
finally it dies with: |
| 10:28 |
|
kados |
po/npl_opac_hu_HU.po: PO file is corrupted, or not a PO file |
| 10:29 |
|
kados |
owen: sorry, I don't have access to the bugzilla server |
| 10:29 |
|
kados |
owen: have to wait till chris is up |
| 10:32 |
|
owen |
It's no big deal. |
| 10:41 |
|
owen |
kados: I have a statistics question for you |
| 10:41 |
|
kados |
sure |
| 10:41 |
|
owen |
Do you think it is possible to generate a report of all active members, where active is defined by activitiy within the last X years? |
| 10:42 |
|
kados |
yea, piece of cake |
| 10:42 |
|
kados |
just do a join on issues |
| 10:42 |
|
kados |
and if they've got an entry with a timestamp after X |
| 10:42 |
|
kados |
they they're active |
| 10:42 |
|
owen |
Except that we've purged issues before haven't we? |
| 10:43 |
|
kados |
ahh ... |
| 10:43 |
|
kados |
:-) |
| 10:43 |
|
kados |
not recently |
| 10:43 |
|
kados |
probably been a year or more |
| 10:43 |
|
owen |
I see the statistics table includes borrowernumber...maybe from there? |
| 10:43 |
|
kados |
yep ... you could probably do something there |
| 10:43 |
|
kados |
I've never purged stats |
| 10:44 |
|
owen |
I was talking to Lauren after our meeting, and she mentioned something about the State library wanting us to 'purge our patron records' |
| 10:45 |
|
owen |
I asked why, and she said they didn't want us reporting stats about numbers of library patrons if that number included inactive patrons |
| 10:45 |
|
owen |
So I said why purge the records, why not just give them a report that only included active members? |
| 10:47 |
|
kados |
yep |
| 10:47 |
|
kados |
in fact ... |
| 10:47 |
|
kados |
we can just check to see if a patron's account is expired |
| 10:47 |
|
kados |
no need to even touch statistics |
| 10:49 |
|
owen |
That might be possible after we've worked under the improved expiration system in the next upgrade, but it wouldn't work right now |
| 10:49 |
|
kados |
why not? |
| 10:50 |
|
owen |
Because in all likelihood most of our patrons are expired right now and we don't even realize it. |
| 10:50 |
|
kados |
something like: |
| 10:50 |
|
kados |
select count(*) from borrowers where expiry > '2004-01-01'; |
| 10:50 |
|
kados |
24811 |
| 10:50 |
|
kados |
hmmm ... I'm pretty sure you can't issue books to an expired patron |
| 10:50 |
|
owen |
That's not the case in NPL's production version |
| 10:51 |
|
owen |
It doesn't care |
| 10:51 |
|
owen |
My record, for instance, expired 12/31/2005 |
| 10:51 |
|
kados |
ahh |
| 10:51 |
|
kados |
shoot |
| 10:52 |
|
kados |
when does lauren need those stats? |
| 10:52 |
|
owen |
I'm not sure...I don't think it was very pressing |
| 11:53 |
|
kados |
osmoze: hi there |
| 11:53 |
|
dewey |
que tal, kados |
| 11:54 |
|
osmoze |
hi all :) |
