Time  Nick   Message
11:54 osmoze hi all :)
11:53 dewey  que tal, kados
11:53 kados  osmoze: hi there
10:52 owen   I'm not sure...I don't think it was very pressing
10:52 kados  when does lauren need those stats?
10:51 kados  shoot
10:51 kados  ahh
10:51 owen   My record, for instance, expired 12/31/2005
10:51 owen   It doesn't care
10:50 owen   That's not the case in NPL's production version
10:50 kados  hmmm ... I'm pretty sure you can't issue books to an expired patron
10:50 kados  24811
10:50 kados  select count(*) from borrowers where expiry > '2004-01-01';
10:50 kados  something like:
10:50 owen   Because in all likelihood most of our patrons are expired right now and we don't even realize it.
10:49 kados  why not?
10:49 owen   That might be possible after we've worked under the improved expiration system in the next upgrade, but it wouldn't work right now
10:47 kados  no need to even touch statistics
10:47 kados  we can just check to see if a patron's account is expired
10:47 kados  in fact ...
10:47 kados  yep
10:45 owen   So I said why purge the records, why not just give them a report that only included active members?
10:45 owen   I asked why, and she said they didn't want us reporting stats about numbers of library patrons if that number included inactive patrons
10:44 owen   I was talking to Lauren after our meeting, and she mentioned something about the State library wanting us to 'purge our patron records'
10:43 kados  I've never purged stats
10:43 kados  yep ... you could probably do something there
10:43 owen   I see the statistics table includes borrowernumber...maybe from there?
10:43 kados  probably been a year or more
10:43 kados  not recently
10:43 kados  :-)
10:43 kados  ahh ...
10:42 owen   Except that we've purged issues before haven't we?
10:42 kados  they they're active
10:42 kados  and if they've got an entry with a timestamp after X
10:42 kados  just do a join on issues
10:42 kados  yea, piece of cake
10:41 owen   Do you think it is possible to generate a report of all active members, where active is defined by activitiy within the last X years?
10:41 kados  sure
10:41 owen   kados: I have a statistics question for you
10:32 owen   It's no big deal.
10:29 kados  owen: have to wait till chris is up
10:29 kados  owen: sorry, I don't have access to the bugzilla server
10:28 kados  po/npl_opac_hu_HU.po: PO file is corrupted, or not a PO file
10:28 kados  finally it dies with:
10:28 kados  Strange line in po/npl_opac_hu_HU.po:
10:28 kados  paul_away: i get a bunch of errors:
10:26 kados  paul_away: having trouble with the .po translation system
10:25 kados  paul are you around?
10:16 owen   And when I put in a search term under "Enter a bug # or some search terms:" it tells me I've entered an invalid bug number
10:16 owen   And then redirects.  But ever since the upgrade Bugzilla has had no style.
10:15 owen   When I go to http://bugs.koha.org, it says "I think you are looking for index.cgi"
09:51 kados  yea?
09:28 owen   Bugzilla needs help
08:33 owen   G'morning
08:33 kados  hey owen
02:46 osmoze hello
20:35 rach   how are you dewey?
20:35 dewey  hi, rach
20:35 rach   howdy
20:11 dewey  kados: what?
20:11 kados  dewey: tell
20:11 dewey  kados: excuse me?
20:11 kados  dewey: !tell
20:11 kados  @tell
20:11 kados  !tell
17:02 kados  dewey: help
17:02 dewey  kados: wish i knew
17:02 kados  dewey: ?
17:02 dewey  kados: sorry...
17:02 kados  dewey: @tell
17:02 kados  @tell