Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
02:36 |
|
jenkins_koha |
Starting build #265 for job Koha_3.8.x (previous build: SUCCESS) |
03:06 |
|
|
wizzyrea joined #koha |
03:13 |
|
jenkins_koha |
Project Koha_3.8.x build #265: SUCCESS in 37 min: http://jenkins.koha-community.[…]b/Koha_3.8.x/265/ |
03:13 |
|
jenkins_koha |
Jared Camins-Esakov: Bug 9174: Fix itemtype image display in OPAC lists |
03:13 |
|
huginn |
Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]w_bug.cgi?id=9174 normal, P5 - low, ---, jcamins, Pushed to Stable , Item type image does not display for biblio-level itemtypes in list display in OPAC |
03:14 |
|
jenkins_koha |
Starting build #56 for job Koha_3.10.x (previous build: SUCCESS) |
03:30 |
|
jcamins_away |
Yay! |
03:54 |
|
|
NateC joined #koha |
03:55 |
|
jenkins_koha |
Project Koha_3.10.x build #56: SUCCESS in 41 min: http://jenkins.koha-community.[…]b/Koha_3.10.x/56/ |
03:55 |
|
jenkins_koha |
* liz: Bug 9382 - updating permission labels |
03:55 |
|
jenkins_koha |
* Jared Camins-Esakov: Bug 9382: Increment version number |
03:55 |
|
jenkins_koha |
* liz: Bug 9268 - Scanning in barcode or ISBN in Acquisitions -> new order submits the form unexpectedly |
03:55 |
|
huginn |
Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]w_bug.cgi?id=9382 trivial, P5 - low, ---, koha-bugs, Pushed to Stable , Bold necessary permissions for staff client access. |
03:55 |
|
huginn |
Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]w_bug.cgi?id=9268 trivial, P5 - low, ---, liz, Pushed to Stable , Scanning in barcode or ISBN in Acquisitions -> new order submits the form unexpectedly |
03:55 |
|
jcamins_away |
Yay! |
03:55 |
|
jenkins_koha |
Starting build #266 for job Koha_3.8.x (previous build: SUCCESS) |
04:32 |
|
jenkins_koha |
Project Koha_3.8.x build #266: SUCCESS in 37 min: http://jenkins.koha-community.[…]b/Koha_3.8.x/266/ |
04:32 |
|
jenkins_koha |
liz: Bug 9268 - Scanning in barcode or ISBN in Acquisitions -> new order submits the form unexpectedly |
04:32 |
|
huginn |
Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]w_bug.cgi?id=9268 trivial, P5 - low, ---, liz, Pushed to Stable , Scanning in barcode or ISBN in Acquisitions -> new order submits the form unexpectedly |
04:33 |
|
jenkins_koha |
Starting build #57 for job Koha_3.10.x (previous build: SUCCESS) |
04:43 |
|
wizzyrea |
yusss |
04:47 |
|
|
NateC joined #koha |
04:54 |
|
wizzyrea |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?[…]annotation_960881 |
05:01 |
|
wizzyrea |
soren says "cats being jedis - that's adorable" |
05:13 |
|
jenkins_koha |
Project Koha_3.10.x build #57: SUCCESS in 40 min: http://jenkins.koha-community.[…]b/Koha_3.10.x/57/ |
05:13 |
|
jenkins_koha |
ed.veal: Bug 9308 - logo-koha.png not transparent in ccsr theme |
05:13 |
|
huginn |
Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]w_bug.cgi?id=9308 minor, P5 - low, ---, ed.veal, Pushed to Stable , logo-koha.png not transparent in ccsr theme. |
05:56 |
|
|
rambutan joined #koha |
07:38 |
|
|
rambutan joined #koha |
07:45 |
|
|
cait joined #koha |
08:40 |
|
|
drojf joined #koha |
08:41 |
|
drojf |
good morning #koha |
08:42 |
|
wizzyrea |
morning |
08:43 |
|
drojf |
hi wizzyrea |
08:43 |
|
* cait |
waves |
08:44 |
|
drojf |
hi cait |
08:44 |
|
wizzyrea |
hi cait :) |
09:16 |
|
wizzyrea |
this seems topical for jcamins: https://www.youtube.com/watch?[…]e=player_embedded |
09:30 |
|
cait |
search rewrite! |
09:30 |
|
* cait |
coulnd't hold it back |
10:15 |
|
cait |
oh interesting |
10:36 |
|
|
trendynick joined #koha |
11:10 |
|
|
trendynick joined #koha |
15:08 |
|
jcamins_away |
For the record, I got excited about that announcement when they first made it and told everyone on #koha how exciting it was. |
15:09 |
|
jcamins_away |
So you should be retroactively interested in my announcement about it as well. |
15:09 |
|
jcamins_away |
:) |
15:16 |
|
cait |
I may have missed it - blaming timezones :) |
15:16 |
|
cait |
wondering when this will be available to us? |
15:16 |
|
cait |
probably needs a new version of zebra.. packages and stuff? |
15:20 |
|
jcamins_away |
I don't think they package new versions of Zebra very often, so to use it we'd probably have to install from source. |
15:23 |
|
cait |
oh boo |
15:56 |
|
drojf |
or build our own packages |
15:56 |
|
cait |
hm maybe |
15:57 |
|
drojf |
yay, cait is volunteering \o/ |
15:57 |
|
drojf |
not? |
15:58 |
|
cait |
lol |
15:58 |
|
cait |
no not :) |
16:00 |
|
|
NateC joined #koha |
17:10 |
|
|
NateC joined #koha |
17:22 |
|
|
NateC joined #koha |
17:47 |
|
|
Oak joined #koha |
17:53 |
|
|
drojf1 joined #koha |
17:54 |
|
|
NateC joined #koha |
18:21 |
|
rangi |
Morning |
18:22 |
|
drojf |
morning rangi |
18:22 |
|
|
NateC joined #koha |
18:25 |
|
cait |
morning rangi |
18:28 |
|
rangi |
11 days of sun in a row comes to an end. It's cloudy today |
18:28 |
|
rangi |
@wunder nzwn |
18:28 |
|
huginn |
rangi: The current temperature in Wellington, New Zealand is 20.0°C (7:00 AM NZDT on February 04, 2013). Conditions: Scattered Clouds. Humidity: 83%. Dew Point: 17.0°C. Pressure: 29.74 in 1007 hPa (Steady). |
18:28 |
|
cait |
sad? |
18:28 |
|
drojf |
sun? i have heard about that |
18:28 |
|
drojf |
i thought it's an urban legend |
18:29 |
|
rangi |
Still warm for 7am though |
18:29 |
|
|
NateC joined #koha |
18:31 |
|
drojf |
@wunder berlin, germany |
18:31 |
|
huginn |
drojf: The current temperature in Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin, Germany is 3.4°C (7:12 PM CET on February 03, 2013). Conditions: Mostly Cloudy. Humidity: 66%. Dew Point: -2.0°C. Windchill: -1.0°C. Pressure: 29.74 in 1007 hPa (Steady). |
18:31 |
|
drojf |
huginn: you are missing the snow rain |
18:31 |
|
huginn |
drojf: I'll give you the answer as soon as RDA is ready |
18:38 |
|
rangi |
My stop bbiab |
18:39 |
|
cait |
@wunder Konstanz |
18:39 |
|
huginn |
cait: The current temperature in Taegerwilen, Taegerwilen, Germany is 0.9°C (7:35 PM CET on February 03, 2013). Conditions: Mostly Cloudy. Humidity: 83%. Dew Point: -2.0°C. Windchill: 1.0°C. Pressure: 30.15 in 1021 hPa (Steady). |
18:40 |
|
cait |
drojf: stop complaining :) |
18:40 |
|
drojf |
cait: i'm at home, all is fine ;) |
18:44 |
|
* cait |
has soup |
19:09 |
|
|
kathryn joined #koha |
19:10 |
|
cait |
good morning kathryn :) |
19:10 |
|
kathryn |
hi there cait :) |
19:10 |
|
cait |
:) |
19:11 |
|
kathryn |
@wunder wellington, nz |
19:11 |
|
huginn |
kathryn: The current temperature in Wellington, New Zealand is 20.0°C (7:00 AM NZDT on February 04, 2013). Conditions: Scattered Clouds. Humidity: 83%. Dew Point: 17.0°C. Pressure: 29.74 in 1007 hPa (Steady). |
19:11 |
|
kathryn |
<-- I wore a t-shirt on the ferry today! |
19:11 |
|
cait |
oh |
19:12 |
|
kathryn |
this is warm for 8am... |
19:12 |
|
cait |
still so warm? |
19:12 |
|
kathryn |
aha |
19:12 |
|
kathryn |
come visit :) |
19:12 |
|
cait |
wish I could! |
19:37 |
|
|
libsysguy joined #koha |
19:51 |
|
Guest286 |
good morning :) |
19:52 |
|
wizzyrea |
let's try that again - good morning |
19:57 |
|
libsysguy |
kia ora wizzyrea |
19:57 |
|
cait |
good morning wizzyrea :) |
20:01 |
|
wizzyrea |
ok, since there are people here |
20:02 |
|
wizzyrea |
bug 9322 - what do you think of the assertion that there should probably never be more than one transfer on an item at a time? |
20:02 |
|
huginn |
Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]w_bug.cgi?id=9322 major, P5 - low, ---, koha-bugs, NEW , If multiple transfers exist (from circ/branchtransfers.pl), completing one completes them all |
20:02 |
|
cait |
hm |
20:02 |
|
cait |
transfers get created when a hold is triggered? |
20:02 |
|
cait |
or when I set something into transfer manually |
20:02 |
|
wizzyrea |
yes, and can be triggered independently as well. |
20:02 |
|
cait |
that right? |
20:02 |
|
rangi |
both |
20:02 |
|
rangi |
yeah |
20:03 |
|
cait |
I assume... since we should not be able to trigger more than one hold at a time on the same item |
20:03 |
|
cait |
and it should be not allowed to trigger a tranfer without resolving the hold first ... |
20:03 |
|
wizzyrea |
transfers are separate |
20:03 |
|
cait |
thereshould not be more than one |
20:03 |
|
wizzyrea |
but you can have a transfer that is unrelated to any hold. |
20:03 |
|
wizzyrea |
as well as a transfer that is related to a hold. |
20:04 |
|
cait |
I mean if something is in transfer already |
20:04 |
|
wizzyrea |
should the ability to do this be preserved? |
20:04 |
|
cait |
it should not be possible to manually do another one |
20:04 |
|
wizzyrea |
why? |
20:04 |
|
wizzyrea |
(not being a troll, I really want to know) |
20:04 |
|
cait |
hm |
20:04 |
|
cait |
yeah |
20:04 |
|
cait |
because it will mess with th ehold. |
20:04 |
|
cait |
? :) |
20:05 |
|
cait |
I would have to draw it I guess |
20:05 |
|
wizzyrea |
well currently |
20:05 |
|
wizzyrea |
you can have two different types of transfers - |
20:05 |
|
|
NateC joined #koha |
20:06 |
|
wizzyrea |
manual ones, and ones that are tied to a reserve |
20:07 |
|
cait |
I tihnk we have to think abou tthe possible processes |
20:07 |
|
cait |
maybe really have a table or drawing |
20:07 |
|
cait |
and I might be influenced by reading too much about business processes in the last few days :) |
20:07 |
|
wizzyrea |
thinking like that might be useful. |
20:08 |
|
|
rambutan joined #koha |
20:08 |
|
wizzyrea |
My *instinct* is that the behaviour needs to be preserved |
20:09 |
|
wizzyrea |
but the deleting holds bug fixed |
20:09 |
|
wizzyrea |
s/transfers/holds/ |
20:10 |
|
wizzyrea |
monday. my brain is not on. |
20:10 |
|
wizzyrea |
you know what I mean. I hope. |
20:11 |
|
cait |
not monday here yet |
20:11 |
|
cait |
but sunday night... is not much diferent :) |
20:13 |
|
wizzyrea |
the more I think about it, I think a library always wants to have a record of where things are supposed to be going, that means that if an item is marked in transit for a hold, and it is *ignored* that transfer should be deleted, a transit home set up, and the hold set back to the top of the priority list |
20:14 |
|
wizzyrea |
so that the next item to pass a scanner gun triggers the hold and the patron is served expediently |
20:14 |
|
wizzyrea |
the way it works now, is that the hold is stuck on that patron, and it will likely never be filled. |
20:15 |
|
cait |
i think having mor ethan one transfer might be confusing |
20:15 |
|
cait |
to the system |
20:15 |
|
wizzyrea |
we know it is confusing. |
20:15 |
|
wizzyrea |
but it does smart things with transfers |
20:15 |
|
cait |
and not sure what takes precendence when another hold is placed and things like that |
20:15 |
|
wizzyrea |
like if you place multiple transfers, it chains them |
20:15 |
|
wizzyrea |
it just deletes them all when you receive the first. |
20:15 |
|
wizzyrea |
which is the actual problem. |
20:17 |
|
cait |
hm |
20:17 |
|
cait |
I think my brain is not on |
20:18 |
|
|
sweil joined #koha |
20:18 |
|
wizzyrea |
chains = place a transfer from cpl ->mpl, place another it goes from mpl -> fpl, place another it goes from fpl -> fvpl, etc. |
20:25 |
|
rangi |
hmm community survey |
20:27 |
|
wizzyrea |
hm. |
20:28 |
|
cait |
hm? |
20:28 |
|
cait |
rangi: wizzyrea kicked me |
20:28 |
|
cait |
:P |
20:28 |
|
cait |
ok, i had requested it... somehow |
20:30 |
|
wizzyrea |
you told someone to "push you out of #koha" |
20:30 |
|
wizzyrea |
>.> |
20:30 |
|
wizzyrea |
<.< |
20:31 |
|
cait |
yeah I did :) |
20:31 |
|
cait |
wizzyrea++ :) |
20:32 |
|
wizzyrea |
oh I thought maybe you were suggesting this was an abuse of power ^.^ |
20:32 |
|
wizzyrea |
:) |
20:33 |
|
cait |
only trying to tease you a little :) it was all ok |
20:40 |
|
wizzyrea |
hehe it's cool I probably deserve teasing. ^.^ |
20:42 |
|
cait |
hmm |
21:01 |
|
jcamins_away |
Having more than one transfer active makes no sense. |
21:01 |
|
cait |
jcamins_away: that was what I was thinking |
21:01 |
|
jcamins_away |
If a book is at CPL, and someone adds a transfer to DPL but doesn't actually start the transfer, when they change their mind and decide the book is needed at EPL, the book should not be sent to DPL first. |
21:02 |
|
jcamins_away |
That's just a waste of postage. |
21:02 |
|
jcamins_away |
If a book is wanted at DPL *and* at EPL, nothing changes. |
21:03 |
|
wizzyrea |
but that's not how transfers are currently designed to work. and you can't see or delete them from the interface |
21:03 |
|
jcamins_away |
Right, and that's the problem that Kyle identified. |
21:03 |
|
jcamins_away |
(in the comment, not in the bug) |
21:03 |
|
wizzyrea |
but what if the person *intended* to chain the transfers. |
21:04 |
|
jcamins_away |
Then they want the book at DPL. |
21:04 |
|
jcamins_away |
And they should not start the transfer to EPL before it has arrived for whatever reason. |
21:04 |
|
wizzyrea |
but what if the librarian wants it to go to dpl, and then EPL |
21:04 |
|
jcamins_away |
They wanted the book at DPL. |
21:04 |
|
jcamins_away |
Even if only for a few minutes. |
21:04 |
|
wizzyrea |
but the person at DPL doesn't know it's supposed to go to EPL |
21:04 |
|
wizzyrea |
only the person at APL does. |
21:05 |
|
jcamins_away |
The system can't cope with that. |
21:05 |
|
jcamins_away |
Period. |
21:05 |
|
jcamins_away |
There is no way to make the system cope with that. |
21:05 |
|
wizzyrea |
It tries to do that though. |
21:05 |
|
wizzyrea |
if you put 2 transfers on at one originating branch |
21:05 |
|
wizzyrea |
it will do two chained transfers. |
21:05 |
|
wizzyrea |
but completing the first one completes them all. |
21:06 |
|
jcamins_away |
Okay, let me put my objection a different way. |
21:06 |
|
wizzyrea |
i'm not really arguing with you - I just always remember |
21:06 |
|
wizzyrea |
@quote get 123 |
21:06 |
|
huginn |
wizzyrea: Quote #123: "rangi: #thingsihavelearnt if there is a mad scheme a library somewhere will be doing it ... except madder" (added by wizzyrea at 09:20 PM, March 30, 2011) |
21:06 |
|
eythian |
hi |
21:06 |
|
jcamins_away |
Yeah, and I don't care whether there's more than one transfer. |
21:07 |
|
|
trea joined #koha |
21:07 |
|
jcamins_away |
However, as far as I can understand, the situation you're describing is impossible to resolve. |
21:07 |
|
jcamins_away |
No matter how many transfers there are. |
21:07 |
|
wizzyrea |
not unless you mark one as the current transfer |
21:07 |
|
wizzyrea |
and all of the others as subsequent. |
21:08 |
|
jcamins_away |
But that's a different situation. |
21:08 |
|
jcamins_away |
At least, different from what Kyle asks about. |
21:08 |
|
jcamins_away |
I think. |
21:08 |
|
jcamins_away |
Isn't he asking about *current* transfers? |
21:09 |
|
wizzyrea |
right now, they are essentially the same thing as far as I can tell |
21:09 |
|
wizzyrea |
every transfer is the current transfer. |
21:09 |
|
jcamins_away |
Oh, hm. |
21:09 |
|
jcamins_away |
I thought there was a distinction. |
21:09 |
|
wizzyrea |
no, afaict there is no mechanism by which a transfer can be prioritised. |
21:09 |
|
jcamins_away |
With a distinction, having two current transfers makes no sense at all. |
21:09 |
|
jcamins_away |
Because the book is getting simultaneously sent to two different places. |
21:09 |
|
jcamins_away |
Which is insane. |
21:10 |
|
jcamins_away |
Not quote 123, just impossible on all but a sub-atomic level. |
21:10 |
|
rangi |
how long have you been working with libraries |
21:10 |
|
wizzyrea |
that is exactly what happens now with automatic itemreturn generated transfers and reserves transfers |
21:10 |
|
jcamins_away |
lol |
21:10 |
|
rangi |
as if that would stop them trying |
21:10 |
|
wizzyrea |
:) |
21:10 |
|
jcamins_away |
rangi: what, chop the book in half? |
21:11 |
|
jcamins_away |
It makes just as much sense to me as checking one item out to two patrons, which we don't allow. |
21:11 |
|
wizzyrea |
I think what kyle is getting at, unless I'm being daft |
21:11 |
|
wizzyrea |
is a simple solution whereby only one transfer can be placed at a time for any item. |
21:11 |
|
wizzyrea |
and I think that we cannot go there. |
21:11 |
|
jcamins_away |
I thought he was getting at a solution whereby only one transfer could be active at a time for any item. |
21:12 |
|
wizzyrea |
because there may be reasons to have both standard transfers |
21:12 |
|
wizzyrea |
and reserve ones |
21:12 |
|
wizzyrea |
only having one active makes sense. |
21:12 |
|
wizzyrea |
only having one period doesn't |
21:12 |
|
jcamins_away |
So if someone at library A initiates a transfer to library B for a book then transfers it to library C instead, it shouldn't be marked as going to library B. |
21:13 |
|
wizzyrea |
heh |
21:13 |
|
wizzyrea |
that scenario happens ALL THE TIME |
21:13 |
|
jcamins_away |
And I maintain that shouldn't happen. |
21:13 |
|
wizzyrea |
currently |
21:13 |
|
wizzyrea |
what happens there |
21:13 |
|
wizzyrea |
is you get an entry for wrongtransfer |
21:13 |
|
wizzyrea |
and it creates a new transfer back from c to b |
21:13 |
|
rangi |
people put things in the wrong box all the time |
21:13 |
|
wizzyrea |
^^ |
21:14 |
|
jcamins_away |
rangi: sure, but I'm not talking about mailing the book to library C when they meant library B. |
21:14 |
|
jcamins_away |
I thought Kyle was talking about the situation where the librarian at library A starts a transfer to library B, then says "no, I meant library C," retransfers, and the book still gets sent via library B. |
21:15 |
|
jcamins_away |
I'm not entirely sure because I've been using Plack, which means holds don't function. |
21:15 |
|
jcamins_away |
I regularly have my holds show up at Fairfield when I sent them to Centerville for no reason at all. |
21:15 |
|
jcamins_away |
(and it's not the mail... I type in the barcodes myself!) |
21:17 |
|
wizzyrea |
the solution to kyle's problem is to create an interface for librarians to delete a transfer that they have initiated. |
21:17 |
|
wizzyrea |
make an oopsie, delete that one, put in the one they meant to. |
21:17 |
|
jcamins_away |
I like that idea. |
21:17 |
|
wizzyrea |
and leave the chaining alone. |
21:18 |
|
jcamins_away |
I guess I don't see how the chaining he's talking about exists if you delete the erroneous transfer. |
21:18 |
|
jcamins_away |
Unless the "chaining" is "having transfers that should be triggered later." |
21:19 |
|
jcamins_away |
In which case I'm just confused about how that could be not useful. |
21:20 |
|
|
NateC joined #koha |
21:20 |
|
rangi |
99% of things that are 'not useful' end up being "i dont have a library who does it like that" i always keep that in mind |
21:21 |
|
rangi |
if we dont, we end up with acquisitions |
21:21 |
|
jcamins_away |
But _every_ library system with more than one branch has to send books to multiple places. |
21:21 |
|
rangi |
oh lemme just kill the aqordersbreakdown code |
21:21 |
|
* cait |
hands rangi a big cookie |
21:21 |
|
jcamins_away |
It's not a minor workflow issue. |
21:22 |
|
rangi |
neither are 99% of the things that get broken |
21:22 |
|
wizzyrea |
yea, it was one of the things that I had to fight with the people at NEKLS a lot about "doing that will break it for other libraries, our way is not the only way" |
21:22 |
|
jcamins_away |
True. |
21:22 |
|
rangi |
i do think the delete is the best way round this |
21:22 |
|
wizzyrea |
and fixing the delete one deletes them all |
21:22 |
|
jcamins_away |
I'm now confused about why we don't have non-current transfers. |
21:23 |
|
rangi |
yeah |
21:24 |
|
jcamins_away |
Shouldn't we? |
21:24 |
|
wizzyrea |
it's needed fixing for a while ;) |
21:25 |
|
wizzyrea |
this behaviour has been this way at least since I've been using koha. I wasn't able to explain it until recently |
21:25 |
|
wizzyrea |
I think a couple of things need to happen |
21:26 |
|
wizzyrea |
we need to be able to delete transfers that are independent of reserves |
21:26 |
|
wizzyrea |
the prompts need to be made clearer as to what actually is happening |
21:27 |
|
wizzyrea |
(A librarian wants to transfer this to A, but it is on reserve for patron at B, what do you want me to do?) |
21:27 |
|
|
barriers joined #koha |
21:28 |
|
wizzyrea |
the problem of completing one transfer completing them all needs to be fixed |
21:31 |
|
rangi |
yep |
21:33 |
|
|
nengard joined #koha |
21:34 |
|
jcamins_away |
Heh. Bug 9536 is not going in on my watch. |
21:34 |
|
huginn |
Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]w_bug.cgi?id=9536 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, gmcharlt, NEW , Make it still easier to add to the the list of possible encodings for Z39.50 servers. |
21:34 |
|
jcamins_away |
I foresee nearly limitless problems with a dropdown fifty pages long. |
21:35 |
|
cait |
? |
21:35 |
|
wizzyrea |
well he says "pick and choose which ones to add" |
21:35 |
|
wizzyrea |
in his message |
21:36 |
|
jcamins_away |
He says "please prepopulate with every valid encoding." |
21:36 |
|
wizzyrea |
oo I read that wrong. |
21:36 |
|
* wizzyrea |
would be ok with people having to specify the ones they want on top of the default. |
21:36 |
|
* jcamins_away |
proceeds to ignore it other than the amused comment. |
21:36 |
|
jcamins_away |
Sure. |
21:36 |
|
jcamins_away |
I'd be fine with the table. |
21:36 |
|
jcamins_away |
But prepopulating with every single possible encoding? |
21:36 |
|
jcamins_away |
Nope. |
21:37 |
|
wizzyrea |
seems nuts. |
21:37 |
|
cait |
jcamins_away: maybe leave a comment? might be a misunderstanding |
21:38 |
|
cait |
ah right, misread |
21:38 |
|
cait |
thought we were talking about magnus' patch |
21:39 |
|
jcamins_away |
Nope. |
21:39 |
|
cait |
justforget what I said |
21:39 |
|
jcamins_away |
:) |
21:44 |
|
eythian |
why would we include Perl in our downloads? |
21:44 |
|
eythian |
that's a very odd idea |
21:45 |
|
jcamins_away |
eythian: because "back on System V you didn't have to worry about whether you had the dependencies," or something like that. |
21:45 |
|
eythian |
ah, right. Glad we've moved on, then. |
21:48 |
|
* jcamins_away |
guffaws |
21:48 |
|
wizzyrea |
oh and now he wants a git log in about. |
21:48 |
|
jcamins_away |
Sorry, I found it funny. |
21:48 |
|
eythian |
wizzyrea: I assume you and trea are heading to a pub this afternoon for the Superb Owl? :) |
21:48 |
|
wizzyrea |
while I am wholly in favor of owls |
21:48 |
|
* jcamins_away |
should stop reading his e-mail and laughing uproariously. |
21:48 |
|
cait |
heh |
21:48 |
|
wizzyrea |
except for the food, I don't have much care for Superb ones |
21:49 |
|
jcamins_away |
Instead I should read Jasper Fforde and laugh uproariously. |
21:49 |
|
wizzyrea |
(we have a team?) |
21:49 |
|
wizzyrea |
now, come march |
21:49 |
|
wizzyrea |
if KU has a team in the tournament, and they get very far at all |
21:49 |
|
wizzyrea |
THEN you might find me in a pub. |
21:49 |
|
cjh |
hmm I dont seem to get the funny emails, was this on the koha ml? |
21:49 |
|
wizzyrea |
bugs list |
21:49 |
|
jcamins_away |
cjh: bugs list. |
21:50 |
|
jcamins_away |
And they're funny only if you have a deranged sense of humor. |
21:50 |
|
* wizzyrea |
is going to respond tthat this development would be welcomed :P |
21:50 |
|
wizzyrea |
but it's unlikely to be fixed. |
21:50 |
|
jcamins_away |
Go for it. |
21:50 |
|
jenkins_koha |
Starting build #58 for job Koha_3.10.x (previous build: SUCCESS) |
21:51 |
|
eythian |
http://koha-community.org/supp[…]ha-mailing-lists/ <-- btw this says: "If you are a developer then you will probably want to join the patches,commits and bugs mailing lists as well." but lacks a link to it. |
21:51 |
|
jcamins_away |
As long as you note that the git log with only one-line per patch is almost 18k lines long. |
21:51 |
|
jcamins_away |
*one line |
21:51 |
|
cjh |
eythian: I was just reading that page, and thought I was going crazy as I couldnt find the bugs list :) |
21:51 |
|
* wizzyrea |
resists the urg to mark it wontfix. |
21:52 |
|
eythian |
don't forget to include the patch where you include the patch where you include the patch where you include the log. |
21:54 |
|
cait |
wizzyrea: you could mark it wishlist :) |
21:55 |
|
wizzyrea |
I marked it as "assigned" and assigned it to him. |
21:55 |
|
wizzyrea |
HINT HINT NUDGE NUDGE |
21:56 |
|
cjh |
heh, your reply is amusing to read :) |
21:56 |
|
* wizzyrea |
learned from the best |
21:57 |
|
cait |
hehe |
21:57 |
|
cait |
rangi: um |
21:57 |
|
wizzyrea |
is there a "wishlist?" |
21:57 |
|
cait |
the dashboard |
21:57 |
|
cait |
that passed qa report doesn't look right |
21:57 |
|
cait |
ordoes it... maybe |
21:57 |
|
* cait |
is tired |
21:58 |
|
rangi |
it does to me |
21:58 |
|
cait |
I was wondering about you and liz showing up there |
21:58 |
|
cait |
but i tmigt just have happened cleaning up a bug status |
21:58 |
|
wizzyrea |
yes I think it probably did |
21:58 |
|
rangi |
yep |
21:59 |
|
cait |
all goo |
21:59 |
|
cait |
d |
21:59 |
|
cait |
good night all :) |
21:59 |
|
cjh |
night :) |
21:59 |
|
rangi |
night cait |
21:59 |
|
|
cait left #koha |
22:01 |
|
|
BobB joined #koha |
22:05 |
|
BobB |
Morning all |
22:07 |
|
wizzyrea |
mornin |
22:31 |
|
jenkins_koha |
Project Koha_3.10.x build #58: SUCCESS in 40 min: http://jenkins.koha-community.[…]b/Koha_3.10.x/58/ |
22:31 |
|
jenkins_koha |
adrien.saurat: Bug 9343: handles the new format of Debarred [3.10.x] |
22:31 |
|
huginn |
Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]w_bug.cgi?id=9343 minor, P5 - low, ---, adrien.saurat, Pushed to Stable , SIP doesn't handle debarred date/status correctly |
22:45 |
|
|
Irma joined #koha |
22:51 |
|
|
NateC joined #koha |
23:44 |
|
|
papa joined #koha |
23:52 |
|
|
NateC joined #koha |
23:54 |
|
|
rambutan joined #koha |