| Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
| 12:38 |
|
owen |
Congratulations to us! Hooray for Koha Beta! |
| 13:27 |
|
hdl |
owen : joshua should be able to become op. |
| 13:28 |
|
owen |
We ought to have more than one op, so that people can set the topic for the channel |
| 13:32 |
|
atz |
yeah , I imagine any of us could do better than "No Topic" |
| 13:54 |
|
hdl |
yes something like 3.0 Beta Out... |
| 14:39 |
|
owen |
atz? |
| 14:39 |
|
atz |
yes |
| 14:40 |
|
owen |
I'm looking at moremember.pl, wondering why all the checked out items are showing up as overdue, whether or not they are |
| 14:40 |
|
owen |
There's a "red" variable set at line 231 |
| 14:40 |
|
owen |
I wonder if that comparison, ( $datedue < $today ) , isn't working properly |
| 14:41 |
|
atz |
let me check... (haven't seem moremember in a while... thankfully) |
| 14:42 |
|
atz |
should be an OK comparison, since both are explicitly ISO |
| 14:43 |
|
atz |
one from POSIX:strftime "%Y%m%d" |
| 14:43 |
|
owen |
Should that be %Y-%m-%d ? |
| 14:44 |
|
atz |
ah, yes... i think you're right |
| 14:44 |
|
atz |
good catch |
| 14:46 |
|
atz |
the default output from amysql date field will have hyphens |
| 14:49 |
|
owen |
Hmm... still not working. |
| 14:50 |
|
owen |
warn $datedue." < ".$today; gives me 2008-02-24 < 2008-03-24 |
| 14:50 |
|
owen |
Is that comparison invalid? |
| 14:50 |
|
atz |
yeah... it's not numerical |
| 14:51 |
|
atz |
if it were the non-hyphenated version of the ISO dates, numberical would be ok |
| 14:51 |
|
atz |
lol "numberical" |
| 14:52 |
|
owen |
:) |
| 14:55 |
|
atz |
so the choices are, use "lt" comparison w/ hyphens |
| 14:55 |
|
atz |
or make a hyphenless dates for < |
| 14:56 |
|
owen |
lt seems to work. Is one method superior? |
| 14:56 |
|
atz |
in this case not much difference, since we are coming from well structured data |
| 14:57 |
|
owen |
Problem solved then, thanks |
| 15:47 |
|
kados |
morning all |
| 15:47 |
|
kados |
owen: are you seeing this problem with the MARC editor where some of the fields don't display? |
| 15:48 |
|
owen |
what should I look for? |
| 15:48 |
|
kados |
just bring up any record and check out the 100 tag |
| 15:50 |
|
owen |
Okay... I see it. |
| 15:50 |
|
atz |
kados: marc_subfield_structure table "hidden" field? |
| 16:27 |
|
kados |
owen: any ideas on that issue? |
| 16:27 |
|
owen |
Sorry kados, I don't know what the issue is |
| 16:27 |
|
kados |
k |
| 16:27 |
|
kados |
owen: so you're not seeing the problem? |
| 16:28 |
|
owen |
kados, were you expecting me not to see the 100 tag? |
| 16:28 |
|
kados |
yea |
| 16:29 |
|
kados |
http://koha.liblime.com/cgi-bi[…]uing/addbiblio.pl |
| 16:29 |
|
kados |
for some reason the fields don't show up |
| 16:29 |
|
kados |
some of them anyway |
| 16:31 |
|
ryan |
yuck |
| 16:31 |
|
kados |
ryan: have you seen that? |
| 16:31 |
|
ryan |
advancedmarceditor syspref |
| 16:32 |
|
ryan |
? |
| 16:32 |
|
kados |
maybe |
| 16:33 |
|
kados |
yep, that was it |
| 16:33 |
|
kados |
damn |
| 16:33 |
|
kados |
flakey sysprefs-- |
| 16:34 |
|
ryan |
mark that one for removal |
| 17:37 |
|
atz |
does anybody actually use ISBD "tag cloud" in 3.0? |
| 17:37 |
|
atz |
it looks like it is strictly a holdover from pre-git code |
| 17:39 |
|
martinmorris |
hello |
| 17:39 |
|
martinmorris |
i've got a 3.0.0 alpha installation, to upgrade to the new beta do i just copy over the new code? |
| 17:40 |
|
atz |
martinmorris: no |
| 17:40 |
|
martinmorris |
glad I asked :) |
| 17:41 |
|
martinmorris |
MARC export my biblios and reinstall from scratch? |
| 17:41 |
|
atz |
you can copy the new code, and then access the staff interface |
| 17:41 |
|
atz |
getting the web installer |
| 17:41 |
|
atz |
did you customize anything (and want to preserve it)? |
| 17:41 |
|
martinmorris |
not really no |
| 17:42 |
|
atz |
then it is pretty much an overwrite, then using the web interface to run apply updates to the database |
| 17:42 |
|
martinmorris |
ah, that's what i really wanted to know, if the database had to be updated too |
| 17:42 |
|
martinmorris |
thanks atz |
| 17:43 |
|
atz |
no problem. if you want to start hacking, you might use this occasion to do the install from git (version control) |
| 17:44 |
|
martinmorris |
i'm just test-installing really |
| 17:44 |
|
martinmorris |
and using it to slowly catalogue our library's collection properly |
| 17:44 |
|
atz |
in secret, perhaps? :) |
| 17:47 |
|
martinmorris |
hehe, no - there's a few of us |
| 18:16 |
|
owen |
atz, ISBD tag cloud? |
| 18:16 |
|
owen |
Aren't those two different things? |
| 18:16 |
|
atz |
to me yes... |
| 18:17 |
|
atz |
but that's what it calls itself |
| 18:17 |
|
atz |
opac-tags_subject.pl |
| 18:18 |
|
owen |
You mean the title in the title bar? I'll bet that's just a typo |
| 18:18 |
|
atz |
the title bar links "tag cloud", the page linked titles itself ISBD |
| 18:28 |
|
atz |
owen: do you actually have data in the tags table ?? |
| 18:29 |
|
owen |
I do. Does that mean that at some point I ran a script to populate it? |
| 18:29 |
|
atz |
that's what I can't figure out |
| 18:29 |
|
atz |
where does that data ever come from? |
| 18:30 |
|
atz |
the script/page is self contained, no module, no other backend |
| 18:34 |
|
owen |
What about misc/cronjobs/build_browser_and_cloud.pl ? |
| 18:40 |
|
owen |
atz: http://wiki.koha.org/doku.php?[…]s=build%20browser |
| 19:35 |
|
owen |
It looks like there's not a system pref to block item-level holds in the OPAC. Can anyone confirm? |
| 19:44 |
|
owen |
Why does opac-reserve.pl always say "Priority: out of ?" ? |
| 19:44 |
|
owen |
<!-- TMPL_VAR Name="fixedRank" --> comes out blank, and what is "?" supposed to accomplish? |
| 19:45 |
|
owen |
Priority: <blank> out of /we shall never say/ |
| 20:48 |
|
atz |
holds are troublesome and buggy |
| 10:02 |
|
hdl |
hi lloyd_ |
