| Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
| 11:06 |
|
ecognito |
Hi, all. Just installed Koha 3.0 and am trying to do a z3950 search, I get the following error message: |
| 11:06 |
|
ecognito |
Modification of non-creatable array value attempted, subscript -4 at /usr/share/koha/intranet/cgi-bin/cataloguing/z3950_search.pl line 189. |
| 11:06 |
|
ecognito |
I have the library of congress set up my Z39.50 server... not sure what else I need to do... |
| 11:09 |
|
ecognito |
At the bottom of http://tinyurl.com/a2jhhf it mentions a z3950 client daemon but I can't find the script file it mentions. |
| 11:17 |
|
soul9 |
you need the yaz library and ZOOM from cpan |
| 11:18 |
|
ecognito |
Should already have all them. I made sure I installed all prerequisites that running perl Makefile.pl mentioned. |
| 11:20 |
|
soul9 |
yeah, then there are some configuration options that affect z3940 searching. like query* options iirc |
| 11:20 |
|
soul9 |
go to admin/systempreferences.pl and search for query on top |
| 11:20 |
|
soul9 |
i dunno what specifically is failing for you, sorry |
| 11:20 |
|
soul9 |
i know i had to play with these for z3950 to work iirc |
| 18:46 |
|
atz |
anybody know where the "T-prefix" barcode style originates? is it Follett? |
| 18:46 |
|
gmcharlt |
atz: yes |
| 19:54 |
|
atz |
gmcharlt: is it our intention to use the t-prefix filter to convert the following: |
| 19:54 |
|
atz |
T32 => T0000002 |
| 19:55 |
|
atz |
T42 => T0000002 |
| 19:55 |
|
atz |
i'm guessing not |
| 19:56 |
|
atz |
TFOOBAR => T0000000 |
| 19:57 |
|
atz |
TZZZZZZ => T0000000 |
| 20:16 |
|
atz |
ryan: can you clarify why we are dropping the first digit at the T ? |
| 20:56 |
|
ryan |
atz: follett systems strip a leading T\s ... |
| 20:57 |
|
ryan |
it's impossible to tell if a barcode as printed has the T or not in some systems that come from Follett. |
| 20:57 |
|
atz |
ryan: we strip the T AND an additional nonzero digit, then recompose it into T%07d |
| 20:57 |
|
atz |
see the examples T32 and T42 |
| 20:59 |
|
ryan |
atz: that's a line of code often customized, i think. |
| 21:00 |
|
atz |
ok... i sent a in a patch that left the behavior unchanged, but it should be documented what the code is *attempting* to do |
| 21:00 |
|
atz |
i included some test cases based on my limited understanding of what was intended |
| 21:01 |
|
ryan |
originally, it should have converted 'T32' to '32', afair |
| 21:02 |
|
atz |
that's what I would think. |
| 21:02 |
|
ryan |
it definitely was not supposed to convert to T\d+ |
| 04:52 |
|
anasha |
hello #koha wish you all happy new year! |
