| Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
| 11:32 |
|
soroush |
Hello! |
| 11:32 |
|
soroush |
Can you help me understand a problem I have? |
| 11:33 |
|
soroush |
Search (with Zebra) works on the Intranet interface, but not the opac interface. |
| 11:33 |
|
soroush |
This only happens if I upgrade the database from Koha 2.2 to Koha 3, using the guide on the wiki. |
| 11:33 |
|
soroush |
otherwise, search works on a clean database. |
| 11:34 |
|
hdl |
hidelostitems is set. |
| 11:34 |
|
soroush |
I can't see where the problem is. Maybe someone can put me in the right direction? |
| 11:34 |
|
soroush |
hi hdl. |
| 11:35 |
|
soroush |
where can I find 'hidelostitems'? |
| 11:35 |
|
hdl |
Or you have some queryFuzzy or QueryWeightfields in system preferences that blocks search from succeeding. |
| 11:35 |
|
hdl |
Administration>System Preferences |
| 11:35 |
|
soroush |
right. Let me check that, and the queryFuzzy... |
| 11:36 |
|
hdl |
hi soroush |
| 11:37 |
|
soroush |
ok. I turned 'hidelostitems' OFF, and I'm getting results now in OPAC! |
| 11:38 |
|
soroush |
Thanks hdl! I've been stuck on this for a week now!Would that be a problem/bug with Koha? Or is that supposed to work that way? |
| 11:39 |
|
hdl |
mmmm.... |
| 11:39 |
|
hdl |
Let me explain to you |
| 11:39 |
|
hdl |
hide lost items is set to hide lost items at OPAC to users. |
| 11:39 |
|
hdl |
So far so good. |
| 11:40 |
|
soroush |
yup |
| 11:40 |
|
hdl |
But you have to have at least one non NULL value for LOST items in your subfield. |
| 11:40 |
|
hdl |
So |
| 11:40 |
|
hdl |
Have a LOST authorised value list defined. |
| 11:41 |
|
hdl |
a subfield linked to items.itemlost |
| 11:41 |
|
hdl |
and to LOST authorised values. |
| 11:41 |
|
hdl |
And items with correct data. |
| 11:41 |
|
soroush |
right... I see! |
| 11:41 |
|
hdl |
And, last but not least, marc data and marcdata indexed correctly. |
| 11:42 |
|
soroush |
I'll see how it is in my preferences... |
| 11:42 |
|
hdl |
More Over LOST should have only numerical values !!! |
| 11:44 |
|
soroush |
ok, I have item.itemslost mapped to 952$1. |
| 11:44 |
|
soroush |
(that should be items.itemlost) |
| 12:13 |
|
soroush |
ok... I have items.itemlost linked to 952$1. I have created two authorised values for LOST. I've linked those authorised values to 952$1 as well. |
| 12:14 |
|
soroush |
Do I have to update the existing records' lost status? |
| 12:48 |
|
soroush |
I updated a couple of items manually. They now show a 'Item Status (lost)' column for the items (but blank, as the item is not lost) |
| 12:48 |
|
soroush |
But they don't show in the opac search. |
| 14:03 |
|
danny |
hello #koha |
| 14:07 |
|
owen |
Hi danny |
| 16:07 |
|
owen |
Would anyone else like to comment on this proposed solution: http://zivotdesign.com/example[…]pac-detail-2.html to Bug 2713 (http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/b[…]_bug.cgi?id=2713) |
| 16:30 |
|
gmcharlt |
owen: I like it |
| 16:30 |
|
gmcharlt |
only quibble is that "Similar" seems lacking as a heading for that tab |
| 16:30 |
|
owen |
Yeah, I agree... but I'm not sure what's better (while remaining brief) |
| 16:33 |
|
gmcharlt |
Serendipity? |
| 16:33 |
|
gmcharlt |
:) |
| 16:34 |
|
gmcharlt |
it would be more work, but I could see combining the editions and related bibs stuff under one tab |
| 16:35 |
|
owen |
I wondered about that too |
| 18:08 |
|
owen |
gmcharlt: Is "related" better than "similar?" |
| 18:35 |
|
gmcharlt |
owen: I prefer it, but I've been infected with libraryspeak |
| 18:36 |
|
hdl |
hehe sane disease when you speak with librarians. |
| 18:36 |
|
hdl |
,) |
| 19:06 |
|
owen |
Anyone know what the 'advance notice' option under patron messaging does? |
| 19:09 |
|
gmcharlt |
owen: courtesy notices to patrons before their loan is due |
| 19:10 |
|
owen |
Since 'Upcoming Events' and the RSS options don't work, shouldn't they be commented out in the template? |
| 10:18 |
|
Amit |
hi mason |
