| Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
| 11:20 |
|
hdl |
kados around ? |
| 11:34 |
|
kados |
hdl: am now |
| 11:34 |
|
kados |
hdl: what's up? |
| 11:36 |
|
paul |
hello kados. |
| 11:46 |
|
kados |
hi paul |
| 11:47 |
|
hdl |
hi kados |
| 11:51 |
|
hdl |
For instance, if we ask for Title, Phrase (UNIMARC 200$a) Lord Of the Ring and Title (assuming Volume is indexed by Title, in UNIMARC200$v) 2 , |
| 11:51 |
|
hdl |
Will we get The two towers ? |
| 11:53 |
|
hdl |
would it be useful to get a Part-Title Identifier in record.abs ยง? |
| 11:54 |
|
kados |
not sure I understand |
| 11:54 |
|
hdl |
Say we have |
| 11:54 |
|
hdl |
in the catalogue : |
| 11:55 |
|
hdl |
200$aThe Lord Of The Ring$v2$eThe Two Towers |
| 11:55 |
|
hdl |
If we query : Title, Phrase (UNIMARC 200$a) Lord Of the Ring and Title (assuming Volume is indexed by Title, in UNIMARC200$v) 2 , |
| 11:56 |
|
hdl |
wil we get that biblio ? |
| 11:56 |
|
kados |
yep |
| 11:57 |
|
kados |
as long as you're not doing a cross-subfield phrase search like "Lord of the ring 2" |
| 11:58 |
|
hdl |
I tried to setup a wiki page on which we can input all the identifier we use in search and describe them and tell which record it is related to. |
| 11:58 |
|
hdl |
Maybe it is not usefull. |
| 11:59 |
|
hdl |
But I think it is, since we could then tell other Koha devs which query you can setup to query for this or that piece of information. |
| 12:00 |
|
hdl |
Without being too MARC-dependent. |
| 12:01 |
|
kados |
but ... that's already done I think |
| 12:01 |
|
kados |
ccl.properties has extensive documentation |
| 12:02 |
|
kados |
it shouldn't be MARC dependent |
| 12:23 |
|
hdl |
But your advsearch is VERY MARC-dependent |
| 12:24 |
|
kados |
nope, only record.abs is |
| 12:34 |
|
hdl |
Are you telling me that all the limit subtype you give are not MARC-dependant ? |
| 12:35 |
|
hdl |
Braille and DVD record and so on ? |
| 12:57 |
|
toins |
bye all |
| 13:10 |
|
kados |
the distinctions aren't MARC-dependent .. where they are made (record.abs) is |
| 13:24 |
|
hdl |
kados : but codes such as : mc-rtype:i or mc:t are MARC-dependent are they not ? |
| 13:30 |
|
kados |
nope |
| 13:30 |
|
kados |
ahh ... yes, those are |
| 13:30 |
|
kados |
but they should be translated |
| 13:31 |
|
kados |
I haven't gotten around to it yet |
| 13:32 |
|
kados |
instead of mc-rtype:i, the user-facing query should be something like 'type:children's books' or something |
| 13:32 |
|
kados |
then the back-end translates it into cm-rtype:i in USMARC, and whatever in UNIMARC |
