Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
12:00 |
|
kados |
thd: ideally we'd have all the subjects returned to the template individually with an associated tagsubfield |
12:00 |
|
kados |
hmmm ... actually that's problematic ... how do you get the anchor to be correct? |
12:03 |
|
thd |
kados: You would not want as separate headings |
12:03 |
|
thd |
Greece |
12:03 |
|
thd |
History |
12:03 |
|
thd |
Rome |
12:03 |
|
thd |
Science |
12:03 |
|
thd |
Science, Ancient |
12:04 |
|
kados |
thd: what I meant was |
12:04 |
|
kados |
you have a TMPL_LOOP |
12:04 |
|
kados |
with two variables: |
12:04 |
|
kados |
subject, tagsubfield |
12:04 |
|
thd |
kados: You would want |
12:04 |
|
thd |
Science--History--Greece |
12:04 |
|
thd |
Science--History--Rome |
12:04 |
|
thd |
Science, Ancient |
12:04 |
|
kados |
so each set comes out like this: |
12:05 |
|
kados |
Science 650a |
12:05 |
|
kados |
history 650x |
12:05 |
|
kados |
Rome 650z |
12:05 |
|
kados |
(each is a separate value) |
12:06 |
|
kados |
so then you can build your link: |
12:06 |
|
kados |
<a href=" |
12:06 |
|
kados |
<TMPL_LOOP_ |
12:06 |
|
kados |
) |
12:06 |
|
kados |
oops |
12:06 |
|
kados |
> |
12:06 |
|
kados |
wait ... |
12:07 |
|
thd |
kados: There is a related issue for when the subfield order is not alphabetic but Paul hax fixed that in head for 2.4 |
12:08 |
|
kados |
my idea is problematic |
12:08 |
|
kados |
I need to think further about this |
12:08 |
|
thd |
kados: Mostly order is alphabetic so there might be a 2.2.4 fix for this if you have one. |
12:08 |
|
thd |
kados: I had noticed something else. |
12:08 |
|
kados |
thd: just a sec |
12:09 |
|
kados |
thd: Science--History--Greece is one link? |
12:09 |
|
kados |
thd: or three? |
12:10 |
|
thd |
kados: one collective link but could be separable by the user with a sophisticated interface |
12:10 |
|
kados |
:-) |
12:10 |
|
kados |
what's normally done? |
12:10 |
|
kados |
in 3.0 maybe we could have the user-defined one |
12:10 |
|
kados |
but in the meantime, what's should the default be? |
12:10 |
|
kados |
one collective or seperate? |
12:11 |
|
thd |
kados: almost every OPAC has just one |
12:11 |
|
kados |
ok ... so we want: |
12:11 |
|
thd |
collectively |
12:11 |
|
kados |
something like this: |
12:11 |
|
kados |
<a href="q=Science&q=History&q=Greece">Science--History--Greece</a> |
12:11 |
|
kados |
thd: right? |
12:12 |
|
thd |
kados: exactly |
12:12 |
|
kados |
we want each subject as it's own variable |
12:12 |
|
kados |
in the query right? |
12:12 |
|
kados |
and ideally they should even be ordered |
12:12 |
|
thd |
kados: otherwise they cannot be found in marc_words |
12:13 |
|
kados |
so it's actually q=Science*history*greece |
12:13 |
|
kados |
hmmm ... this will change drastically with Zebra |
12:14 |
|
thd |
kados: does that '*' work in marc_words with only separate entries for each elemental term? |
12:15 |
|
kados |
yep |
12:16 |
|
thd |
kados: I thought that your first query was correct |
12:17 |
|
kados |
thd: I think if we can get the script to order the subject correctly before passing them to the template this will work: |
12:17 |
|
kados |
<a href="<TMPL_LOOP NAME='MARCSUBJECTS"></TMPL_LOOP> |
12:17 |
|
kados |
q=<TMPL_VAR NAME='subject'> |
12:17 |
|
kados |
<TMPL_LOOP NAME="MARCSUBJECTS"> |
12:17 |
|
kados |
owen: what do you think? |
12:17 |
|
kados |
<TMPL_VAR NAME='subject'>-- |
12:17 |
|
kados |
</TMPL_LOOP></a> |
12:17 |
|
thd |
for the way marc_words stores subfield values |
12:18 |
|
kados |
well it's not quite right ... it's missing a > to close out the first href |
12:18 |
|
owen |
Looks like the right idea |
12:18 |
|
kados |
yea ... a few probs with the syntax ;-) |
12:19 |
|
owen |
If you feed the search script the terms that way, will it search only for items matching those subject headings in that order? |
12:20 |
|
kados |
this is a bit better: |
12:20 |
|
kados |
<a href="search.pl?<TMPL_LOOP NAME='MARCSUBJECTS"> |
12:20 |
|
kados |
q=<TMPL_VAR NAME='subject'>& |
12:20 |
|
kados |
</TMPL_LOOP>"> |
12:20 |
|
kados |
<TMPL_LOOP NAME="MARCSUBJECTS"> |
12:20 |
|
kados |
<TMPL_VAR NAME='subject'>-- |
12:20 |
|
kados |
</TMPL_LOOP></a> |
12:20 |
|
kados |
owen: that's the problem |
12:21 |
|
kados |
owen: I'm not sure about the order |
12:21 |
|
owen |
You wouldn't want to return a record with subjects "greece" and "history" if you were looking for something with the subject "Greece--History" |
12:21 |
|
kados |
right |
12:22 |
|
kados |
so that's problematic ... |
12:22 |
|
kados |
so you'd have to have a special syntax for searching in order |
12:23 |
|
kados |
I don't think the Koha boolean 'exact' search is working |
12:23 |
|
thd |
Koha does not understand subfield order yet even though it is recorded. |
12:25 |
|
thd |
kados: Why would you specfy a sequence of the subfields in the search when it is not present in marc_words yet while the individual terms would be present? |
12:29 |
|
thd |
kados: This could work well enough for now with q=Science&History&Greece without needing to change marc_words for q=Science*History*Greece. Would it not? |
12:30 |
|
owen |
thd, but what if you have a book with one subject "science" and another "history--greece"? |
12:31 |
|
owen |
...but you were searching for only "science--history--greece" |
12:33 |
|
thd |
owen: obviously my suggestion about how to approach fixing this for the moment is not perfect but would work now. I doubt the query kados proposes would work without additional changes to marc_words. Later, it will change for 3.0 for the proper solution. |
12:34 |
|
thd |
owen: I think your example is uncommon enough to not be bothersome for the moment. |
12:37 |
|
thd |
The basic issue of compund subjects is the norm for books in my experience but I actually had a modest difficulty finding some common titles at NPL for an example. |
12:37 |
|
thd |
kados owen: Do you see anything wrong with this title http://search.athenscounty.lib[…]tail.pl?bib=65618 |
12:38 |
|
owen |
Long-standing problem |
12:38 |
|
owen |
Supposedly being fixed incrementally by hand |
12:39 |
|
thd |
owen: What is the origin of the problem? |
12:39 |
|
owen |
I think it was caused by our previous ILS |
12:40 |
|
thd |
owen: OK. I had imagined a template character set issue for 'ö'. |
12:42 |
|
owen |
That's not what's causing this problem. But that doesn't mean there might not be an issue with extended character display, as evidenced by bug 885 |
12:42 |
|
thd |
:) |
12:48 |
|
thd |
owen kados: The subfield order bug that paul has fixed for 2.4/3 is actually manifest in my example. It did not seem correct to me. |
12:49 |
|
thd |
owen, kados: This example should be Science--Greece--History and Science--Rome--History. |
12:50 |
|
thd |
kados: your latest migration does not have either problem because that library incorrectly has 650 $aScience--Greece--History instead of 650 $aScience$Greece$xHistory |
12:51 |
|
thd |
s/$Greece/$zGreece |
12:53 |
|
thd |
kados: The correct subfield ordering is not alphabetic in this case. 650 $aScience$zGreece$xHistory |
13:00 |
|
thd |
kados: you were asking paul about biblioitems.classification, biblioitems.dewey, biblioitems.subclass earlier. Chris had explained it to me last night. |
13:22 |
|
thd |
kados: biblioitems.classification was originally intended for prefix (852 $k), biblioitems.dewey was originally intended for DDC (852 $h or 082 $a); and biblioitems.subclass was originally intended for cutter (852 $i or 082 $b) |
13:22 |
|
thd |
kados: However, currently chris had said that most people just usually put everything in biblioitems.dewey (852 $k, 852 $h, 852, $i 852 $m or 852 $k, 082 $a, 082 $b, 852 $m) and adjust the templates to accommodate the one column. Searches work faster when everything is in one column. |
13:40 |
|
kados |
right |
13:41 |
|
kados |
thd: so how can we solve the subject ordering problem theoretically? |
14:12 |
|
thd |
kados: subfield order from imported records has been preserved in Koha from the beginning. I have neglected to add a note to bug 997 about that. The templates do not use the subfield order currently. Paul has fixed this for 2.4/3.0 so I would not worry about the order problem for now just the other aspect of linking compound subjects. |
14:13 |
|
kados |
thd: could you add that note, and also write a summary of your findings about subjects to koha-devel? |
14:13 |
|
kados |
thd: IIRC chris has some good ideas for what to do with subjects (the original Koha did them nicely) |
14:14 |
|
thd |
kados: so your idea about solving the linking issue would not work? |
14:14 |
|
kados |
thd: I don't think so |
14:15 |
|
thd |
kados: I had a suggestion for paul but it is not in front of my mind at the moment. |
15:11 |
|
owen |
Boy the new menus added in the latest round of updates are really broken on our test machine |
15:12 |
|
owen |
They also look like they may be Macromedia Dreamweaver-generated code, which I don't think would fit into GPL |
15:14 |
|
thd |
owen: Is the output of HTML authoring applications encumbered by license restrictions? |
15:14 |
|
owen |
It might be if it's a built-in javascript |
15:14 |
|
owen |
I don't know for sure |
15:15 |
|
thd |
owen: Would that case not be more like a compiler where the license for the compiler does not attach to the object code? |
15:19 |
|
owen |
Well, in this case Dreamweaver is adding actual code to a page, rather than simply compliling something. So it could be problematic |
15:21 |
|
thd |
owen: Now I understand, Dreamweaver creates code for the output instead of merely providing an editing environment. |
15:22 |
|
owen |
Yes |
15:23 |
|
thd |
owen: Well, that would require investigation. They may just want to encourage use of their application and be fine with however the output was licensed. |
15:57 |
|
owen |
The best UPS in the world won't save you when your two-year-old presses the power button on your computer |
15:57 |
|
rach |
lol |
15:58 |
|
rach |
up there with puppy eating your cables (which both olive and sam did) |
15:58 |
|
thd |
owen: Teach your two year old to always press the button twice. |
15:59 |
|
thd |
rach: You need a two year old to play with your puppies. Perhaps an arrangement could be made :) |
16:00 |
|
owen |
That's quite a hike for a play-date, but we'd make the trip if we could ;) |
16:03 |
|
rach |
luckily the puppies did grow out of it |
16:03 |
|
owen |
rach: chris sent me a copy of your black-and-white templates. I'm putting them on our test server now for a look |
16:03 |
|
rach |
sam loves kids, particularly when they get just big enough to throw things for her :-) |
16:04 |
|
rach |
either toys or food will do :-) |
16:04 |
|
rach |
cool owen, I'd say we put the most effort into acquisitions as that's what was most broken |
16:05 |
|
owen |
How up-to-date would you say they are compared to the default templates? |
16:06 |
|
thd |
rach: what is broke about acquisitions? |
16:09 |
|
rach |
we did them off the default and npl ones I think from 2.2.2 but check that with chris |
16:09 |
|
rach |
um template bugs if you have marc off (probably with marc on as well) |
16:10 |
|
thd |
rach: Do you have templates at Katipo that adress this problem or not yet? |
16:10 |
|
rach |
yes that's what we've just given to owen |
16:12 |
|
thd |
owen: let me know when they are in CVS |
16:12 |
|
owen |
I could add them if rach and chris want, but it's up to them |
16:13 |
|
thd |
owen: Was your intention to use them as a model to fix the NPL template? |
16:14 |
|
owen |
They might be the basis for a new default template for Koha. We'll see. |
16:16 |
|
thd |
owen rach: I know someone who could use a minimal working acquisitions module. |
16:17 |
|
thd |
owen: I need to know what to tell her about the status of acquisitions in Koha. |
16:18 |
|
owen |
The fact is, I don't know what the status is because we don't use Koha's acquisitions functions. I've been through the templates, but never as a person actually using them |
16:18 |
|
rach |
thd - the underlying code works |
16:18 |
|
rach |
there are some template bugs, but our templates do fix them |
16:18 |
|
rach |
all our clients use acq either simple or normal, so we have templates if the regular ones aren't doing it for you |
16:19 |
|
rach |
jsut be a bit or hand waving to get them going - might not work out of the box |
16:19 |
|
rach |
(or CVS) |
16:19 |
|
thd |
rach: but you do not know if your templates work in MARC Koha? |
16:20 |
|
owen |
I wish I knew what the acquisitions workflow was. If I had a acquisitions 'timeline,' I could have a better understanding of what people do/need step by step |
16:21 |
|
thd |
owen: there is an interactive presentation of cquisitions at Katipo. |
16:22 |
|
rach |
um I believe they do thd |
16:22 |
|
rach |
as in we have switched back and forth |
16:24 |
|
thd |
owen: Katipo acquisitions tutorial, http://www.katipo.co.nz/client[…]sk/koha-help.html , requires a little time or bandwidth to download. |
16:25 |
|
thd |
owen: Do you know how NPL currently manages accounting for acquisitions? |
16:27 |
|
rach |
and there is another one for simple |
16:28 |
|
rach |
http://katipo.co.nz/gallery/album27 |
16:28 |
|
rach |
the process hasn't changed much |
16:28 |
|
owen |
NPL does all acquisitions and cataloging outside of Koha, and bulk imports MARC records |
16:30 |
|
thd |
owen: Is the cataloguing and accounting tied together in any way at NPL? I know that you use ITS MARC for Windows to do cataloguing. |
16:31 |
|
owen |
I don't think so |
16:31 |
|
owen |
Ordering is done separately from cataloging |
16:32 |
|
thd |
owen: What software package is used for acquisitions accounting at NPL? |
16:33 |
|
owen |
I don't know, it's not my department :) |
16:33 |
|
thd |
:) |
19:07 |
|
thd |
Why would items not be exported in the MARC export? |
19:29 |
|
thd |
Nevermind, "Note : the items are NOT exported by this tool" in the template for MARC Export must be left over from a time when items were not exported. |
19:32 |
|
thd |
rosa: how interested in additional acquisition options might you be? |
19:42 |
|
thd |
rosa: rach has posted a message to the koha-devel list suggesting that "it would be worth checking with Rosalie how interested in additional acquisition options they might be." |
19:43 |
|
thd |
rosa: I may have someone else interested as well, if you are? |
20:12 |
|
kados |
thd: who do you have that's interested? |
20:26 |
|
rach |
IRC won't be the way to do that though - e-mail would be bgetter |
20:27 |
|
thd |
rach: OK but they are your customer. |
20:28 |
|
thd |
rach: Maybe you should really ask. |
20:30 |
|
thd |
rach: you know them best, and what they actually do. |
20:34 |
|
rach |
well I will talk to them about it, but if you want to start a dialogue on the list you can |
20:34 |
|
rach |
I'm not sure if the thing about acquisitions went to other than koha-devel for example |
20:36 |
|
rach |
they aren't using 2.2/2.2.3 yet, so it's a bit moot at the moment |
20:36 |
|
thd |
rach: I only noticed it on koha-devel. |
20:36 |
|
thd |
rach: what are they using? |
20:37 |
|
rach |
we haven't up graded them |
20:37 |
|
thd |
rach: 2.0 |
20:37 |
|
rach |
nope |
20:37 |
|
rach |
1.3 ish |
20:37 |
|
rach |
so no marc |
20:37 |
|
thd |
rach: I did not expect that they were using MARC. |
20:38 |
|
thd |
rach: What do they use for accounting now? |
20:39 |
|
rach |
? they use koha acquisitions - normal, they are who we wrote it for |
20:39 |
|
rach |
so it does what rosa wants, she speced it |
20:39 |
|
rach |
we just try to stop the rot usually |
20:40 |
|
thd |
rach: It seems as if it does what Rosa origianally wanted. Perhaps her desires have changed since version 1.3 :) |
20:41 |
|
thd |
rach: Do they export accounting data and put it in another application? |
20:42 |
|
chris |
its more that 2.0 busted it completely |
20:42 |
|
chris |
which is why we didnt upgrade them, my purpose in life seems to be putting back stuff that ppl break :-) |
20:43 |
|
chris |
so 2.2.3 we are testing now, to see how fixed it is |
20:43 |
|
chris |
but now i have to go work again |
20:43 |
|
thd |
rach: Do they use another appliction for accounting outside of Koha that does something other than Koha acquisitions? |
20:47 |
|
thd |
chris: If more people were actually using it well, they would have more of an interest in not breaking it. |
20:49 |
|
kados |
chris rach you might want to get opac-passwd working for HLT and others right away |
20:49 |
|
kados |
chris rach it's a drop and run solution |
20:50 |
|
kados |
chris rach (though it will need translation of about three lines of spanish) |
20:54 |
|
thd |
kados: does opac-passwd fix anything other than accidental duplation of IDs. |
20:55 |
|
thd |
? |
20:56 |
|
thd |
kados: have you looked at SQL-Ledger? |
20:58 |
|
thd |
http://www.sql-ledger.org/ |
21:00 |
|
thd |
A fairly mature program. It does require postgres still though. MySQL 5 is theoretically possible. |
21:02 |
|
kados |
thd: I don't understand the question |
21:04 |
|
thd |
kados: sql-ledger is a fairly mature GPL accounting program written in Perl, if the one in Koha is not featurefull enough. |
21:04 |
|
kados |
thd: looks nice |
21:04 |
|
thd |
kados: It can do much more than merely support acquisitions. |
21:05 |
|
thd |
kados: It might replace some additional external application that people may be using in addition to Koha acquisitions. |
21:06 |
|
kados |
thd: can you write a description of sql-ledger and mention it's uses for Koha on koha-devel? |
21:07 |
|
thd |
kados: I had started to implement it for my bookshop but could not find enough time befor priorities had to change. |
21:07 |
|
thd |
kados: yes I was going to in reply to your message about acquisitions. |
21:13 |
|
thd |
kados: MEDICI is an EDI library written to support Perl for EDI X12, the US standard, Teleorder, the UK standard; and UN EDIFACT, the international standard being adopted in many other countries. http://www.disintegration.org/~david/ The author could probably use additional support for more development though. This is not a mature program like SQL-Ledger. I was also planning to include this in my message. |
21:15 |
|
thd |
kados: MEDICI is only a library leaving much work up to the programmer for implementing something useful. |
01:42 |
|
osmoze |
hello |
03:07 |
|
hdl |
hi |
03:07 |
|
paul_away |
coucou à tous les 2 |
03:12 |
|
Sylvain |
salut les frenchies |
03:12 |
|
paul |
et c'est un envahissement des bleu blanc rouges sur le terrain.... |
03:13 |
|
Sylvain |
moi j'en ai un à signaler (enfin après avoir vérifier qu'il n'est pas dans bugzilla) |
03:33 |
|
paul |
hdl tu es par là ? |
03:33 |
|
hdl |
oui. |
03:33 |
|
paul |
je ne comprends pas ton bugfix sur recieve.pl |
03:33 |
|
paul |
! $line{title} = ($results[$i]->{'truetitle'}?$results[$i]->{'truetitle'}:$results[$i]->{'suggestedtitle'}); |
03:33 |
|
paul |
sur la 2.2.x, ca fonctionne correctement la ligne |
03:33 |
|
paul |
! $line{title} = $results[$i]->{'title'}; |
03:34 |
|
paul |
comment tu arrives à truetitle / suggestedtitle ? |
03:34 |
|
hdl |
Le problème , c'est que tu peux avoir 2 titres : celui de la suggestion, et celui de la notice biblio. |
03:35 |
|
hdl |
En tout cas, je me suis retrouvé devant une requête sql qui me paraissait avoir plusieurs fois le champ title. |
03:35 |
|
paul |
zarbi. |
03:35 |
|
paul |
parce qu'on a rempli @results |
03:35 |
|
paul |
avec C4/Acquisition.pm/getallorders |
03:36 |
|
paul |
et que la requète SQL est : |
03:36 |
|
paul |
Select * from aqorders,biblio,biblioitems,aqbasket where aqbasket.basketno=aqorders.basketno |
03:36 |
|
paul |
and booksellerid=? |
03:36 |
|
paul |
and (cancelledby is NULL or cancelledby = '') |
03:36 |
|
paul |
and (quantityreceived < quantity or quantityreceived is NULL) |
03:36 |
|
paul |
and biblio.biblionumber=aqorders.biblionumber and biblioitems.biblioitemnumber= |
03:36 |
|
paul |
aqorders.biblioitemnumber |
03:36 |
|
paul |
group by aqorders.biblioitemnumber |
03:36 |
|
paul |
order by |
03:36 |
|
paul |
biblio.title"); |
03:36 |
|
paul |
qui n'utilise pas les suggestions ou autre. |
03:36 |
|
hdl |
Alors, je les ai tous les deux renommés et j'ai dit, si le champ biblio.title existe, c'est celui-la, sinon.... |
03:37 |
|
hdl |
la table aqorders contient un champ title. |
03:37 |
|
paul |
ah, ca y est, je pense que j'ai compris. |
03:37 |
|
paul |
ce n'est pas en lien avec les suggestions ! |
03:37 |
|
paul |
mais avec le titre qui est dans la "notice d'acquisition" |
03:37 |
|
paul |
lequel titre est supposé être le même dans la notice B et la notice d'acqu |
03:38 |
|
paul |
mais ce n'est effectivement pas toujours le cas. |
03:38 |
|
paul |
(j'avais manqué le commit de Acquisition.pm= |
03:38 |
|
paul |
je comprends mieux maintenant. |
03:38 |
|
paul |
mais je ne suis pas sûr que ce soit bon pour autant. |
03:39 |
|
paul |
(disons que c'est un patch cochon sur du code "moisi") |
03:39 |
|
paul |
la bonne question serait : pourquoi avons nous 2 titres ;-) |
03:39 |
|
hdl |
Merci du compliment. |
03:40 |
|
hdl |
Certes, mais j'aurais tellement de question sur les acquisitions que j'essaie de faire ce que je peux. |
03:41 |
|
hdl |
avec les moyens du bord. |
03:41 |
|
paul |
(ce n'est pas un reproche, le code des acquisitions est à reprendre de fond en comble, nous sommes d'accord) |
03:41 |
|
paul |
bon, revenons en au patch |
03:42 |
|
paul |
dans quel cas on peut avoir truetitle vide ? |
03:42 |
|
paul |
en théorie, lorsqu'on créée une ligne d'acquisition, on créée immédiatement la notice Biblio minimale |
03:42 |
|
paul |
et donc on devrait avoir toujours un biblio.title |
03:43 |
|
hdl |
Es-tu sûr pour la création de la notice biblio minimale ? |
03:43 |
|
paul |
ben, pas tout à fait, je ne suis pas l'auteur du code. |
03:44 |
|
paul |
addorder.pl |
03:44 |
|
hdl |
Visiblement, les notices pour matériaux et déchets ne sont pas créées. |
03:44 |
|
paul |
line 87 et suivantes |
03:44 |
|
paul |
newbiblio / newbiblioitems |
03:46 |
|
hdl |
ok, je veux bien. |
03:47 |
|
paul |
sauf que tu dis avoir trouvé un endroit ou ca n'a pas été le cas ! il y ptet un bug |
03:52 |
|
paul |
bon, je n'arrive pas à reproduire le truc... tant que je n'y arrive pas ou que tu m'expliques comment faire, je laisse ton patch dans le head et je ne le recopie pas dans le rel_2_2 |
03:52 |
|
hdl |
Il semblerait que lorsque tu as fait un test sur ma machine, la notice ait été crée. |
03:52 |
|
hdl |
C'est peut-être le test Si quantité_commandée !=0 qui a fait que je n'ai pas de notice. |
03:52 |
|
paul |
je ne maitrise pas assez les acquisitions pour être sûr qu'il ne mettrait peut être pas de pb ailleurs |
03:53 |
|
paul |
impossible de créer une ligne avec qté =0 |
03:53 |
|
paul |
(sylvain a mis un javascript iirc) |
03:53 |
|
hdl |
Bon. |
03:54 |
|
paul |
ben non, pas bon... faudrait arriver à rendre ce module stable quand même ! |
03:54 |
|
hdl |
Je me demande QUI maîtrise vraiment ajourd'hui. |
03:54 |
|
hdl |
Chris peut-être ? |
03:54 |
|
hdl |
Il semblerait qu'il ait eu à afire des adaptations pour Katipo. |
03:56 |
|
hdl |
Cela dit, même le fonctionnement de ces acquisitions, s'il est intéressant...(Il permet de recevoir des commandes sans les avoir faites ;) ) |
03:56 |
|
hdl |
comme personne ne le connaît ou ne le maîtrise vraiment reste TRES mystérieux, et donc peu maintenable. |
03:57 |
|
paul |
les 1er commits viennent de rangi |
03:57 |
|
paul |
donc chris ;-) |
03:57 |
|
paul |
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/vie[…]rev=1.28&view=log |
03:59 |
|
hdl |
A propos de la fonctionnalité des réceptions sans commandes, c'est en entrant dans le code que j'ai vu que c'était possible. |
04:00 |
|
paul |
tu fais comment ? |
04:00 |
|
paul |
(dans firefox j'entends, pas du pt de vue technique) |
04:02 |
|
hdl |
Il emsblerait que nos amis néozélandais ait la réponse. |
04:02 |
|
hdl |
Moi, je ne peux pas te dire. |
04:02 |
|
hdl |
Je viens de réseeayer. |
04:02 |
|
hdl |
Et je n'arrive toujours pas à créer une notice biblio à la réception. |
04:04 |
|
hdl |
En fait, ce qui pose question et problème, c'est tout un tas de fonctionnalités non commentées, non présentées. |
04:04 |
|
hdl |
Peut-être qu'en regardant les explications de Katipo, on en saurait plus. |
04:07 |
|
paul |
http://www.katipo.co.nz/client[…]sk/koha-help.html |
04:07 |
|
paul |
sauf que ca ne dit rien que nous ne sachions déjà ! |
04:08 |
|
paul |
(et c'est comme ca que ca fonctionne d'ailleurs) |
04:09 |
|
hdl |
J'ai effectivement regardé. Alors j'ai mal compris les dires de Rachel. |
04:10 |
|
paul |
moi aussi, je ne comprends pas tout. |
04:34 |
|
hdl |
paul : return ne fait que sortir d'une conditionnelle ou il fait aussi sortir d'une fonction... |
04:34 |
|
hdl |
C'est une question stupide qui vient de l'analyse d'un patch fourni poue le bug 1001 |
04:35 |
|
paul |
ca sort de la fonction |
04:35 |
|
paul |
enfin, il me semble bine... |
04:35 |
|
paul |
perldoc -f return |
04:35 |
|
paul |
Returns from a subroutine, "eval", or "do FILE" with the value given in EXPR. |
04:35 |
|
paul |
Evaluation of EXPR may be in list, |
04:35 |
|
paul |
scalar, or void context, depending on how the return value will be used, and the context may vary from one execution |
04:35 |
|
paul |
to the next (see "wantarray"). If no EXPR is given, returns an empty list in list context, the undefined value in |
04:35 |
|
paul |
scalar context, and (of course) nothing at all in a void context. |
04:36 |
|
paul |
(Note that in the absence of an explicit "return", a subroutine, eval, or do FILE will automatically return the |
04:36 |
|
paul |
value of the last expression evaluated.) |
04:39 |
|
hdl |
ok. Donc le patch est effectivement loufoque et ne vérifie quasiment RIEN. |
04:39 |
|
hdl |
Je pense que le bug est plus un manque de connaissance des différentes vérifications effectuées dans issuing_rules. |
04:39 |
|
hdl |
Ces vérifications étant tout de même poussées assez loin. |
04:40 |
|
hdl |
Il faut bien le dire. |
04:45 |
|
hdl |
Paul, a quel moment tu mets les valeurs par défaut dans la table issuing_rules ? |
04:45 |
|
hdl |
"If nothing is set, default is 21,5 (hardcoded)" |
04:46 |
|
hdl |
Il semblerait que dans la vérification, on ait perdu ce "harcode" ??? |
04:54 |
|
hdl |
ou bien il faudrait mettre cela à l'insert. |
04:54 |
|
hdl |
Peut-être proposer de saisir des valeurs par défaut qui seraient utilisées. |
04:58 |
|
Sylvain |
une petite question de perl, ça correpsond à quoi ça : $#{$value} ? |
05:02 |
|
hdl |
$# : préfixe pour obtenir le dernier index. |
05:05 |
|
hdl |
En fait, je pense qu'on s'en sert surtout pour connaître le nombre d'élements d'un tableau. |
05:06 |
|
Sylvain |
ok, j'vais essayer d'investiguer ac ces infos merci |
06:45 |
|
osmoze |
j ai un petit probleme avec les bilans, losque je demande un bilan du catalogues, il ne met pour chaque sites 0 que se soit livres, cd ou autre ? |
06:45 |
|
osmoze |
une idée ? |
06:45 |
|
osmoze |
sauf pour le site principale |
06:45 |
|
osmoze |
ou la bdp |
06:46 |
|
hdl |
Combine de sites as-tu ? |
06:46 |
|
osmoze |
3 sites |
06:46 |
|
hdl |
détaille. |
06:46 |
|
osmoze |
et je n ai aucun choix dans la recherche par localisation |
06:46 |
|
osmoze |
Lafrancaise (principal) |
06:46 |
|
osmoze |
loubejac et Vazerac les annexes |
06:47 |
|
osmoze |
et j ai de gros probleme dans les bilans |
06:47 |
|
osmoze |
^^ |
06:47 |
|
hdl |
Les informations sur les sites sont bien enregistrées ? |
06:48 |
|
paul |
hdl, pourquoi je peux pas t'écrire en privé ??? |
06:48 |
|
paul |
"hdl is away ..." |
06:48 |
|
osmoze |
c est un upgrade mais je vais voir de ce pas, d ailleurs, comme j ai pas de choix sur la localisation, je ne peux rien sortir vis a vis des sites |
09:24 |
|
kados |
morning owen |
09:24 |
|
owen |
Hi kados |
09:24 |
|
paul |
hello owen |
09:25 |
|
owen |
I'm looking forward to having a look at that change-password feature |
09:25 |
|
paul |
why is kados always on irc 4 hours before Owen ? does Kados wake up very early or Owen very late ??? good question... |
09:25 |
|
paul |
:-D |
09:25 |
|
owen |
I start work later than most people |
09:26 |
|
paul |
(was just a joke, no need to answer ;-) ) |
09:27 |
|
paul |
owen / joshua, I need some help / proof reading : |
09:27 |
|
paul |
http://bureau.paulpoulain.com:[…]koha/bull-home.pl |
09:27 |
|
owen |
Paul, could forward you a bug-related message from a French speaker? I'm just not understanding his question, and maybe he'll do better in French |
09:28 |
|
paul |
forward. |
09:28 |
|
paul |
(my url : use test / test as usuall as login/password) |
09:28 |
|
paul |
here, search SVM |
09:28 |
|
osmoze |
i think it's mine ^^ |
09:29 |
|
paul |
(in title) |
09:29 |
|
paul |
ISSN button => go to the history of subscriptions for this title |
09:29 |
|
owen |
Your bug message, osmoze? |
09:29 |
|
paul |
Detail => go to subscription detail |
09:30 |
|
paul |
Recieve => go to reciept process of a serial. |
09:30 |
|
paul |
are buttons here & other inside the pages clear enough ? |
09:30 |
|
paul |
lol ! |
09:30 |
|
owen |
kados is a free-wheelin' bachelor |
09:30 |
|
paul |
(but owen has a wife & a baby...) |
09:30 |
|
kados |
yep ;-) |
09:30 |
|
osmoze |
i had wrote a mail for the bug this morning to you owen |
09:31 |
|
paul |
free wheelin ??? |
09:31 |
|
owen |
I didn't realize osmoze = Jean-Sébastien |
09:31 |
|
paul |
(bachelor I think I understand, as we have a real-TV programm called "the bachelor" ...) |
09:31 |
|
kados |
paul: free-wheelin' is an idiom for 'does anything he wants' ;-) |
09:31 |
|
kados |
paul: I'm not sure where it came from |
09:31 |
|
osmoze |
yes owen :) |
09:33 |
|
kados |
paul: I don't see anything on the bull-home.pl screen |
09:33 |
|
kados |
(asside from the Serials Subscriptions blank page) |
09:34 |
|
kados |
paul: do you need proof reading? |
09:34 |
|
paul |
I need some proof reading & be sure that it's clear enough. |
09:34 |
|
paul |
(type SVM in title filter, you'll get 3 subscriptions) |
09:34 |
|
owen |
osmoze, when you click the 'submit' button on the selectbranchprinter page it doesn't submit the form? |
09:35 |
|
paul |
because between subscription detail, subscription list, issues... i'm not sure buttons are clear enough. |
09:35 |
|
kados |
paul: ok i see now |
09:35 |
|
kados |
paul: but I only see one subscription with three notes ;-) |
09:36 |
|
paul |
that's 3 subscriptions for the same title |
09:37 |
|
kados |
paul: IMO you don't need _It_ began on ... |
09:37 |
|
kados |
paul: Began on ... is fine |
09:38 |
|
owen |
paul: Recieve -> Receive |
09:38 |
|
kados |
paul: what is NE PAS BULLETINER !!!! NOTICE FAUSSE |
09:39 |
|
kados |
paul: paul false note? |
09:39 |
|
paul |
"don't use, wrong biblio" |
09:39 |
|
paul |
(wrong subscription) |
09:39 |
|
paul |
in 2.2.3, you can delete a subscription only if there is no serial. |
09:39 |
|
paul |
it seems it was a bad idea (everybody here complains about it ;-) ) |
09:39 |
|
owen |
I think the ISSN button isn't very clear to a new user. The title attribute helps a little. |
09:39 |
|
paul |
so i'll remove this feature. |
09:40 |
|
kados |
paul: paul can't I click on the title from the initial search results to go to the item? |
09:41 |
|
paul |
why do you want to do this ? |
09:41 |
|
kados |
paul: dunno ... :-) |
09:41 |
|
kados |
paul: /me is used to titles as links |
09:42 |
|
owen |
I agree with kados. I'm used to seeing titles as links |
09:43 |
|
kados |
Recieved Issue is a bit confusing: ,N° 233,N° 234,N° 235,N° 236,N° 237,N° 238,N° 239 |
09:43 |
|
paul |
what would you expect ? |
09:43 |
|
paul |
N°233 -> 239 ? |
09:44 |
|
kados |
N° is confusing |
09:44 |
|
paul |
(in french, it should be written N° 233 -> ) |
09:44 |
|
kados |
how about just the numbers without the N |
09:44 |
|
paul |
(without anything after the -> to say the subscription is still "alive") |
09:44 |
|
paul |
the N° has been typed by EMN |
09:44 |
|
owen |
That's generated by the numbering formula, right Paul? |
09:44 |
|
paul |
it's not koha-calculated |
09:44 |
|
kados |
ok |
09:44 |
|
owen |
So it's up to the library to set it |
09:45 |
|
paul |
right owen. |
09:45 |
|
owen |
If we used it, it might say "Vol. IV, No. 3" |
09:45 |
|
kados |
I have a general commment about the buttons |
09:45 |
|
paul |
we could even say "Vol 2005-1 N°124" |
09:45 |
|
paul |
(with 3 variables) |
09:46 |
|
kados |
I think you need a bit more padding around the text |
09:47 |
|
kados |
especially those on the 'complete view' page |
09:47 |
|
kados |
also, rolling over 'back to biblio', the text is crossed out |
09:47 |
|
paul |
(like this ?) |
09:48 |
|
paul |
(you mean in serial-issues.pl with selectview=complete ?) |
09:48 |
|
kados |
yes |
09:48 |
|
osmoze |
that this owen |
09:48 |
|
paul |
right, go to see another page ;-) |
09:50 |
|
kados |
on bull-home (now) the buttons on the right-hand side are scrunched together and they ovverlap |
09:50 |
|
kados |
so now you need more margin on the buttons ;-) |
09:52 |
|
paul |
should be better now. |
09:54 |
|
kados |
better ... |
09:54 |
|
kados |
I always resort to checking 800x600 |
09:54 |
|
kados |
because at NPL many librarians must use this resolution |
09:54 |
|
kados |
(and I suspect elsewhere too) |
09:55 |
|
kados |
the Firefix Web Developer plugin allows you to custommize browser sizes to it's easy to check |
09:55 |
|
kados |
with the click of a button ;-) |
09:56 |
|
paul |
i resize to 1024 with webdev ;-) |
09:57 |
|
kados |
ahh ;-) |
10:10 |
|
thd |
paul: you had said that Koha does not use MARC::Record |
10:10 |
|
paul |
no |
10:10 |
|
paul |
(or i was drunk ;-) ) |
10:11 |
|
paul |
(and as I never drink alcohol...) |
10:11 |
|
paul |
koha make HIGH use of MARC::Record ! |
10:12 |
|
thd |
paul: OK. I had asked about the support for different flavours of MARC in MARC::Record. |
10:13 |
|
paul |
I said we just ignore 2 methods of MARc::Record : ->title() and ->author() |
10:13 |
|
paul |
all other are MARC flavour independant. |
10:13 |
|
paul |
and we use them a lot. |
10:13 |
|
paul |
(what has always be strange to me is that an iso2709 don't say anywhere "i'm UNIMARC" or "i'm MARC21") |
10:14 |
|
paul |
because 200$a means title in UNIMARC |
10:14 |
|
paul |
while it's 245$a in MARC21 |
10:14 |
|
paul |
! |
10:14 |
|
paul |
but there's no way to "find" this in iso2709 |
10:15 |
|
thd |
paul: How do you determine flavour from an unknown record |
10:15 |
|
thd |
? |
10:15 |
|
paul |
I don't ! |
10:15 |
|
paul |
(I mean automatically) |
10:15 |
|
paul |
when you look with a human eye, you can find |
10:15 |
|
paul |
searching for title/author |
10:16 |
|
paul |
it usually gives you a good idea. |
10:16 |
|
paul |
+ editor / publishing year |
10:16 |
|
paul |
+ coded informations only in 1xx UNIMARC |
10:17 |
|
thd |
paul: Must the user must inform the application always? |
10:17 |
|
paul |
I think |
10:17 |
|
thd |
paul: Would there be a way to determine automatically? |
10:18 |
|
paul |
(looking for 200 / 245 would be a solution, but un-official) |
10:19 |
|
thd |
paul: why does code calling MARC::ecord use 'usmarc'? |
10:19 |
|
paul |
??? |
10:19 |
|
tim |
I get an access denied error (many) trying to do a bulkmarcimport, but it looks like it's going into the database anyway. |
10:20 |
|
thd |
paul: Well I would have to find that example code. Maybe 'usmarc'wa an unnecessary component of the example . |
10:21 |
|
paul |
thd i've understood the question. |
10:21 |
|
paul |
in fact, it's what I said yesterday : the module should have been called "iso2709::Record" |
10:21 |
|
paul |
because when you call ->as_usmarc for example, you mean "as_iso2709()" in fact |
10:22 |
|
paul |
if the MARC::Record contains UNIMARC semantics, it works perfectly. |
10:22 |
|
paul |
tim => check the user running bulkmarcimport can read /etc/koha.conf |
10:23 |
|
thd |
tim: That is a database permissions error for the kohaadmin user. If you grant more permissions, I do not remember which one, to the kohaadmin user the error will go away. |
10:24 |
|
tim |
I'm using sudo to run bulkmarcimport as root. |
10:24 |
|
tim |
I never had to mess with permissions on the other installs. I'll check into it anyway. |
10:25 |
|
thd |
tim: bulkmarcimport is accessing the database as the kohaadmin user unless you changed the source code. |
10:26 |
|
tim |
Nope. Didn't change it. That's what I was thinking because of the error, but this is a fresh install. Nothing's been changed. |
10:28 |
|
thd |
tim: Whatever user you use to start bulkmarcimport.pl the kohaadmin user is found and used to connect to the database. If you add more permissions for the kohaadmin user the error will go away. It does not seem to be an imortant error though. |
10:29 |
|
tim |
I'm comparing permissions with the test server to see where the problem is. |
10:29 |
|
thd |
paul: OK I had searched every doc and comment I could find for something like as_unimarc and as_intermarc :) |
10:31 |
|
thd |
paul: Do you know of anything for processing the non-ISO2709 MARCS? |
10:32 |
|
paul |
no |
10:35 |
|
thd |
paul: One important one is the German MAG. Perhaps the may be a way of converting it to ISO 2709. Maybe that means converting it to UNIMARC instead of something more trivial. |
10:37 |
|
tim |
The mysql database has more columns in the tables on the new install. |
10:38 |
|
thd |
paul: Is INTERMARC still the norm in French university libraries or such libraries with the richest collections? |
10:38 |
|
paul |
thd : no, it's UNIMARC |
10:38 |
|
thd |
paul: BnF still uses INTERMARC |
10:39 |
|
paul |
not really. |
10:39 |
|
paul |
internally they use it |
10:39 |
|
paul |
but all products are unimarc by default |
10:39 |
|
thd |
paul: internally is what I meant |
10:39 |
|
paul |
french universities all uses SUDOC (mandatory system), that is un UNIMARC |
10:40 |
|
paul |
& school ministry as well as culture ministry want everybody using unimarc |
10:40 |
|
paul |
(note that it seems that some ppl expect france going to change once again, for ... |
10:40 |
|
paul |
... |
10:40 |
|
paul |
... |
10:40 |
|
paul |
marc21 !!!! |
10:40 |
|
thd |
paul: SUDOC is a network or is it also an ILS? |
10:41 |
|
paul |
none of them. |
10:41 |
|
paul |
I explain : |
10:41 |
|
paul |
all libraries MUST use sudoc as cataloguing tool. |
10:41 |
|
paul |
(with a proprietary software) |
10:42 |
|
paul |
then every night, the sudoc sends a file by ftp with all changes from the day, |
10:42 |
|
paul |
and it's included in local ILS |
10:42 |
|
paul |
if you query the SUDOC, you can find who has a given material. |
10:42 |
|
tim |
I had to set the Lock_tables_priv to Y in the db table to get it to work. It was one of the columns that didn't exist on the other server. |
10:42 |
|
paul |
but if you want to check availability, you must look at local ILS |
10:42 |
|
tim |
Thanks thd and paul |
10:43 |
|
thd |
tim :) |
10:44 |
|
thd |
paul: what is the URL for the SUDOC OPAC? |
10:45 |
|
paul |
http://www.sudoc.abes.fr/ |
10:46 |
|
paul |
(some translation info : PEB = ILL) |
10:46 |
|
thd |
paul: BnF claims some data loss in converting INTERMARC to UNIMARC. |
10:47 |
|
thd |
paul: Is BnF is the only place INTERMARC is still used internally? |
10:47 |
|
paul |
afaik yes |
10:48 |
|
thd |
paul: Which people think that France will change to MARC 21? :) |
10:56 |
|
thd |
paul: When is it necessary or not to run rebuild non-MARC after chnging MARC to Koha links? |
10:56 |
|
paul |
usually yes. |
10:56 |
|
paul |
(it is) |
10:57 |
|
thd |
paul: The docs indicate sometimes not. When would it not be necessary? |
11:03 |
|
thd |
paul: kados thinks he found a bug in rebuildnonmarc.pl last weekend. He said that it seemed to be putting '|' in the itemtypes. |
11:05 |
|
thd |
paul: He told me last night that he had been too busy to report it or ask you about it. |
11:06 |
|
thd |
paul: But you did write the code once, did you not? :) |
11:06 |
|
paul |
I don't know why it would happend a |, but i'll try when I have some time. |
11:06 |
|
paul |
yes. |
11:07 |
|
paul |
(not today, it's 6Pm in France, i'll leave in some minuts) |
11:07 |
|
thd |
Good evening paul |
11:07 |
|
owen |
kados: it looks like the password updater requires a six-character password. Is that correct? |
11:09 |
|
kados |
owen: could be ... I haven't checked |
11:09 |
|
kados |
owen: not a bad thing though is it? |
11:10 |
|
owen |
No, I just wanted to confirm before I wrote the error message |
11:10 |
|
owen |
The translator's being a little vague |
11:10 |
|
kados |
gotcha |
11:10 |
|
kados |
:-) |
11:28 |
|
thd |
owen: There is a message for MARC export falsely claiming that items will not be exported. |
11:30 |
|
owen |
thd: a problem with the template? |
11:30 |
|
kados |
owen: I think it's just a bogus message |
11:37 |
|
tim |
When I tried MARC export, it exported everything when I just asked it to export 10 records. |
11:44 |
|
thd |
wen: just a suggestion to remove it from the templates if the message is as out of date as it appears to be. |
11:44 |
|
thd |
owen: above |
11:47 |
|
owen |
So it shouldnt' say "items are NOT exported by this tool"...because they are? |
11:47 |
|
thd |
tim: had you selected a range of biblionumbers? The ones that Koha stores, not the ones from your old 001 fields? |
11:47 |
|
thd |
owen: They certainly seem to be. |
11:48 |
|
thd |
owen: I was going to confirm that with paul in case of some hidden error but he became paul-away at that moment. |
11:51 |
|
thd |
owen: sorry, I was up last night nursing a file system issue. I got too late a start again today :) |