Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
12:26 |
|
kados |
actually it was the second |
12:26 |
|
kados |
the first time we didn't mention the rss thingy |
12:26 |
|
kados |
oops |
13:37 |
|
kados |
ok |
13:42 |
|
kados |
hmmm I replaced it with the latest 2.0 from cvs and renewals still aren't working |
13:42 |
|
kados |
owen can you confirm that renewals are not working? |
15:01 |
|
kados |
Would it be possible to keep a tab of the items that need to be |
15:01 |
|
kados |
transfered and putting that info in a small side-bar with |
15:01 |
|
kados |
[Mon Oct 18 14:28:00 2004] [error] [client 24.208.176.188] File does not exist: /usr/local/koha/opac/htdocs/opac-tmpl/npl-v/en/includes/opac.css |
15:34 |
|
kados |
how'd that grep go? |
15:54 |
|
kados |
owen here's what I get: |
15:54 |
|
kados |
koha:/build/koha# grep -lr npl-v/en/includes/opac.css /usr/local/koha/* |
15:54 |
|
kados |
/usr/local/koha/intranet/htdocs/intranet-tmpl/npl/en/opac-access_log.log |
15:54 |
|
kados |
/usr/local/koha/intranet/cgi-bin/koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/npl/en/opac-access_log.log |
15:54 |
|
kados |
/usr/local/koha/log/opac-error_log |
15:54 |
|
kados |
/usr/local/koha/log/opac-access_log |
15:54 |
|
kados |
/usr/local/koha/log/opac-error_log.old |
15:54 |
|
kados |
/usr/local/koha/log/opac-error_log.1 |
15:54 |
|
kados |
/usr/local/koha/log/opac-error_log.log.1 |
15:54 |
|
kados |
/usr/local/koha/log/opac-access_log.1 |
15:54 |
|
kados |
/usr/local/koha/opac-access_log.log |
15:54 |
|
kados |
which is kinda silly since these are all logs :-) |
15:56 |
|
kados |
owen: try grep -lr opac.css /usr/local/koha/* |
15:56 |
|
kados |
that output is a bit more interesting |
15:57 |
|
rach |
howdy |
15:59 |
|
owen |
Hi rach |
16:00 |
|
rach |
was v pretty |
16:00 |
|
rach |
we got a bit lost on the way home from the fair |
16:01 |
|
rach |
lucky the car knew which way East was :-) |
16:03 |
|
owen |
You visited at a good time--the fall colors are at their peak |
16:04 |
|
rach |
yep |
16:04 |
|
rach |
we got attacked by geese on the way home :-) |
16:04 |
|
rach |
that is how lost we were |
16:04 |
|
rach |
and got a good old stare from a yokel |
16:06 |
|
owen |
Yep, we've got our share of those. |
16:06 |
|
owen |
Are you in Pittsburgh now? |
16:06 |
|
rach |
nope back home now |
16:07 |
|
rach |
Chris and Laurell will be driving the west coast on honeymoon |
16:08 |
|
owen |
Oh, I'm confused because your message made it through to the Koha list just today :) |
16:09 |
|
rach |
ah yes - chris and I moderate the list, and with us away, it didn't get through |
16:09 |
|
rach |
for the koha list |
16:09 |
|
owen |
Are those from people who aren't posting from an address that is subscribed? |
16:14 |
|
rach |
a mix of those and just spam |
16:14 |
|
rach |
so there would have only been a couple of "real" messages in the big pile |
16:15 |
|
rach |
We are trying to get an upgrade of mailman going so that it deals with the spam itself |
16:15 |
|
rach |
which would be nice |
16:19 |
|
owen |
Yeah, shouldn't it just bounce messages which aren't from subscribed users? |
16:30 |
|
rach |
ah no - because the you get into DNA situations |
16:31 |
|
rach |
where you're used to attack something else |
16:31 |
|
tungsten |
hi |
16:31 |
|
rach |
hi |
16:31 |
|
tungsten |
I like your htkm pages |
16:32 |
|
rach |
erg - DNS not DNA |
16:32 |
|
tungsten |
can you answer a question on item count? |
16:32 |
|
rach |
I can have a go |
16:36 |
|
tungsten |
koha 123 when I bulk import I get one item count The script does not go into the full record ie it only picks up the first 852 locqal holding tag if I run make a mark record and keep running the the bulimport all the 852 are picked up in other words if I have 5 copies I need to run bulkimport 5 times the first will be seen but the other 4 update to where the number of copies should be |
16:39 |
|
rach |
hmm |
16:39 |
|
tungsten |
thanks |
16:40 |
|
rach |
that sounds a bit naff, but quite possible |
16:43 |
|
rach |
sorry that's not much help |
16:43 |
|
rach |
I'm not sure what chris does in that situation - knowing him he just runs it 5 times |
16:44 |
|
rach |
do you have a lot of them? |
16:45 |
|
tungsten |
yes |
16:46 |
|
rach |
it doesn't error or anything? |
16:46 |
|
rach |
it just only sees the first one? |
16:46 |
|
tungsten |
yes |
16:47 |
|
tungsten |
the error is a skipping error line 508 in bulkimport |
16:47 |
|
rach |
did you send this to the list - I think I saw something like it |
16:48 |
|
tungsten |
however if there are 5 I get 4 errors the first time thru and decremnt the error each time |
16:48 |
|
rach |
I can send a mail to chris and see if he has a quick fix |
16:48 |
|
rach |
that is just weird |
16:49 |
|
rach |
and why are you using Koha 1.3? |
16:49 |
|
rach |
or is it 2.3? |
16:49 |
|
tungsten |
koha 123 |
16:49 |
|
kados |
rach I'm here |
16:49 |
|
tungsten |
2.0 is too difficult to set up |
16:49 |
|
rach |
:-) |
16:49 |
|
rach |
fair enuff |
16:50 |
|
tungsten |
koha 123 when I bulk import I get one item count The script does not go into the full record ie it only picks up the first 852 locqal holding tag if I run make a mark record and keep running the the bulimport all the 852 are picked up in other words if I have 5 copies I need to run bulkimport 5 times the first will be seen but the other 4 update to where the number of copies should be |
16:50 |
|
rach |
Joshua have you come acrross that before? |
16:50 |
|
kados |
nope ... |
16:50 |
|
kados |
I'd recommend 2.0.1 |
16:51 |
|
kados |
there is no marc support in koha 123 |
16:51 |
|
tungsten |
what do you mean |
16:52 |
|
rach |
yes there is joshua |
16:52 |
|
rach |
you're able to import marc |
16:52 |
|
kados |
oh, right |
16:52 |
|
rach |
you just don't have to see it :-) |
16:53 |
|
rach |
and it doesn't store it as MARC seperate to the Koha DB |
16:53 |
|
tungsten |
so I won't |
16:53 |
|
kados |
right ... so it looks like there's a problem with the 'repeatable' feature of the bulkmarcimport in koha 123 |
16:53 |
|
tungsten |
be able to bulkexport? |
16:54 |
|
rach |
yep |
16:54 |
|
rach |
umm |
16:54 |
|
rach |
I'll think about that |
16:54 |
|
tungsten |
how to upgrade from 123 to 2.0 |
16:54 |
|
rach |
in the later versions of Koha, the records are basically stored twice |
16:55 |
|
rach |
in MARC "native" format, and in Koha |
16:55 |
|
rach |
I *believe* that you can still export from original Koha, and Chris has been working on update scripts for earilier versions to the latest ones |
16:56 |
|
rach |
although we haven't been recommending people upgrade from 1.x to 2.0 |
16:56 |
|
kados |
The upgrade path from koha 123 is likely harder than just installing 2.0.1 from scratch |
16:56 |
|
rach |
as if you're happy not seeing MARC there hasn't been any gains |
16:56 |
|
rach |
it's 2.2 that has features you're likely to get some benefit from |
16:57 |
|
kados |
yea 2.2's got some nice stuff |
16:57 |
|
tungsten |
I'll give 2.0.1 a try but I found that if a record has a LOC tag it bypases 082 dewey and 853 local holdings |
16:57 |
|
rach |
and that's what we'll want to upgrade HLT to |
16:57 |
|
rach |
which will be the big upgrade project |
16:57 |
|
rach |
for us anyway |
16:57 |
|
kados |
yea ... us too |
16:58 |
|
kados |
we're actually already running some 2.2 stuff on our opac |
16:58 |
|
kados |
like the bookbag and improved searching features |
16:58 |
|
rach |
we've been upgrading UNIDO from the pre release, to 2.0 but that's a little different I guess |
16:58 |
|
rach |
yep |
16:59 |
|
rach |
anyway. tungsten (I'm thinking Steve as a first name?), I've mailed Chris, we did get mail from him earlier today, so you might be in luck and he might be online checking his mail |
16:59 |
|
tungsten |
is 2.2 easier than 2.0 with paameter settings or are they pretty much the same |
16:59 |
|
rach |
same I think |
16:59 |
|
rach |
but you can do really simple parameter settings - so that it's like 1.23 if you want |
17:00 |
|
rach |
that's what we've been doing for people |
17:00 |
|
rach |
just turning off the MARC stuff from a display POV, and using simple acquisitions |
17:00 |
|
rach |
and it's pretty simple |
17:00 |
|
rach |
if you use the vanilla templates (rather than default) I think it even looks ok |
17:02 |
|
tungsten |
it's the 010 tag LOC # that ruins dewey |
17:03 |
|
tungsten |
thanks again g2g |
17:46 |
|
rach |
hi rosalie |