| Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:36 |
|
|
alohabot joined #koha |
| 03:16 |
|
|
bag joined #koha |
| 04:25 |
|
PriyanshuSoni[m] |
<rudyh> "Confirm that the item type you..." <- Yes, i have created a list of Books in public mode. |
| 04:25 |
|
PriyanshuSoni[m] |
* public mode, still nothing is showing in crousel config. |
| 05:40 |
|
|
fridolin joined #koha |
| 06:03 |
|
|
alohabot` joined #koha |
| 06:11 |
|
|
thibaud_g joined #koha |
| 06:16 |
|
|
thibaud_g joined #koha |
| 07:17 |
|
|
lds joined #koha |
| 07:52 |
|
|
fridolin1 joined #koha |
| 07:55 |
|
aw-bib[m] |
hello :) I'd have a small more bibliographic question. our catalouge currently holds a number of "not so common" ids. eg. pointers to inspirehep, arXiv in some cases even wos. I'd not want to loose them and at some later point in time even use them like we do now for uplinking to those sources. how do I preserve them in koha properly? |
| 08:54 |
|
Zahid[m] |
hi every one, need help in patrons |
| 08:55 |
|
Zahid[m] |
i am using koha 22.11 version i have imported all my patrons data into Koha 22.11 |
| 08:57 |
|
Zahid[m] |
about 60000 patrons are imported successfully but when i see in koha the firstname of patron is not display on opening records, it searches correctly |
| 08:58 |
|
|
fridolin1 left #koha |
| 09:00 |
|
Zahid[m] |
the first name of some patrons are display correctly but some patron's firstname is not display |
| 09:01 |
|
Zahid[m] |
any suggestions ? am i missing some thing? |
| 09:25 |
|
|
thibaud_g joined #koha |
| 10:00 |
|
Annelisterman[m] |
Organizational patrons do not have first name. You can save/import it to the borrowers table but if you add organizational patron via staff interface it is not possible to add firstname. Also it is not shown on patron details page if there is one. Could that be the reason? |
| 10:05 |
|
|
cait joined #koha |
| 10:07 |
|
cait |
hello |
| 10:27 |
|
|
oleonard joined #koha |
| 10:28 |
|
oleonard |
o/ |
| 10:30 |
|
cait |
\o |
| 10:34 |
|
|
khall joined #koha |
| 10:49 |
|
Zahid[m] |
what is mean by organization identity vs patron identity ? how can i differentiate ? and on what fields koha separates these two identity? |
| 10:51 |
|
oleonard |
Zahid[m]: It's the same data, stored in the same place. It's just displayed differently based on the patron category |
| 10:51 |
|
cait |
depending on the type you selected for a patron category, the name fields will display a little differently in the patron edit form |
| 10:52 |
|
* cait |
nods |
| 10:58 |
|
Zahid[m] |
thanks i got your point. my issue is resolved. |
| 11:05 |
|
Zahid[m] |
👍️cait oleonard Anneli Österman |
| 11:32 |
|
|
khall_ joined #koha |
| 11:52 |
|
PriyanshuSoni[m] |
Hey guys,... (full message at <https://matrix.org/_matrix/med[…]DwfkseFMvfvscMbmH>) |
| 13:36 |
|
|
RudyHinojosa joined #koha |
| 13:45 |
|
|
Dyrcona joined #koha |
| 14:15 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
What could be causing the edit of an item to hang the interface for about 15-30 seconds? v23.05.02 |
| 14:16 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
using Mariadb |
| 14:16 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
optimized. |
| 14:24 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
https://drive.lightwavelibrary[…]iOj1f-k7Dgzt-GsQo |
| 14:24 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
Current Config |
| 14:31 |
|
cait |
RudyHinojosa: I am not sure, do you have many items on that record? |
| 14:32 |
|
cait |
it's not 'normal' - it should be much quicker |
| 14:32 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
just one. I am seeing a long wait time when triggering the drop down for item types. also seeing item type duplications in the dropdown. but they are not duplicated in admin item types. |
| 14:33 |
|
cait |
that sounds all types of wrong |
| 14:33 |
|
cait |
anything in the console? maybe some JS interfering? |
| 14:33 |
|
cait |
also if you can have a look at the logs server side |
| 14:33 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
https://drive.lightwavelibrary[…]YIqDJ-0LAAIvmHsQo |
| 14:33 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
screen shot of duplicate item types |
| 14:34 |
|
aroussos |
RudyHinojosa: any chance your MariaDB database is located on a host external to the system that hosts Koha? |
| 14:36 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
no. mariadb is on the same server local |
| 14:36 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
checking for JS interference in code blocks. |
| 14:38 |
|
aroussos |
RudyHinojosa: OK then, the next thing I would do is create a very simple SQL report from within Koha (something along the lines of 'SELECT * FROM itemtypes') and run that to see if it returns quickly or hangs for 15-30 seconds |
| 14:39 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
https://drive.lightwavelibrary[…]LBi3U-DbGgoqWIsQo |
| 14:40 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
screen shot of only js in intranet block. I'm using the batch permissions plugin. |
| 14:42 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
>aroussos: sql report came back instant. |
| 14:42 |
|
cait |
just to make sure, I'd try to remove it and try again |
| 14:42 |
|
cait |
just ruling it out as a source of the issue |
| 14:43 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
cait: i'll do that right now. thank you. be right back w/ the verdict. |
| 14:46 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
>cait: no effect. now I haven't restarted the server either after removing the codeblock. may not be required. |
| 14:51 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
something goofy happening on the dropdown onstart routine. |
| 14:51 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
onclick |
| 14:52 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
going to try a different browser. was using edge. |
| 14:53 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
uh oh. firefox does not have a problem. but the item types are still duplicated. |
| 14:53 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
but it's fast. |
| 14:56 |
|
cait |
super strange |
| 14:56 |
|
cait |
I don't have edge to give it a try |
| 14:56 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
I knew I hated microsoft for dozens of reasons, now it's for a bakers dozen reasons. ;) |
| 14:57 |
|
cait |
is a baker's dozen more? |
| 14:57 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
13 |
| 14:57 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
lol |
| 14:57 |
|
cait |
oh! |
| 14:57 |
|
cait |
I am German so haven't come across that yet |
| 14:57 |
|
cait |
if you give me 5 mins I can get my development up and check there at least for the duplication |
| 14:58 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
I'm going to check advanced settings on edge and see if I can find some clues. |
| 14:58 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
ok, I need to tell you that my client is using a consortium and sharing the itemtype across 3 other libraries. |
| 14:59 |
|
cait |
ok so there is a library limitation going on |
| 14:59 |
|
cait |
library groups also? |
| 14:59 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
no groups |
| 14:59 |
|
cait |
but it's showing up twice, not 3 times? |
| 15:00 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
peek at my screenshot. it appears several times. |
| 15:00 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
the main collection |
| 15:01 |
|
cait |
that's a whole lot of main collection |
| 15:01 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
https://drive.lightwavelibrary[…]YIqDJ-0LAAIvmHsQo |
| 15:01 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
yeup. |
| 15:01 |
|
cait |
only once in itemtypes I assume? |
| 15:01 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
yes. |
| 15:02 |
|
cait |
hm in master sample data the itemtypes are ok |
| 15:02 |
|
cait |
I'll try to limit them to some libraries |
| 15:03 |
|
cait |
hm still behaving nicely |
| 15:03 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
https://drive.lightwavelibrary[…]jlpoW-XbHAuG-LsQo |
| 15:04 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
my item type |
| 15:05 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
using edge? |
| 15:05 |
|
cait |
very similar to mine |
| 15:05 |
|
cait |
I can't - on Linux |
| 15:05 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
edge is available on linux |
| 15:05 |
|
cait |
I am not sure I am willing to go there... |
| 15:05 |
|
cait |
but didn't you say it also duplicated in firefox? |
| 15:05 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
microsoft is your friend. let us in! |
| 15:05 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
lol |
| 15:06 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
yes, but at least there is no performance hit. |
| 15:06 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
everything is almost instant. |
| 15:06 |
|
cait |
very odd indeed |
| 15:06 |
|
cait |
I am quickly running out of ideas here |
| 15:07 |
|
cait |
you could try filing a report for the duplication at least - maybe someone else has seen it or an idea |
| 15:07 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
I've seen echoes of dropdown data in coding projects that turned out to be a video driver issue. |
| 15:08 |
|
cait |
that sounds hard to catch |
| 15:09 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
https://answers.microsoft.com/[…]ac93-6569138807a9 |
| 15:14 |
|
cait |
can you confirm the newer version fixes it? |
| 15:16 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
I'm on the latest on Pop-Os |
| 15:16 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
i'll try on a windows machine shortly. |
| 15:22 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
chrome has the same slow behaviour as well on the dropdown. firefox does not have this issue. |
| 15:23 |
|
cait |
i guess most devs still touring Finland - so not many people around here today |
| 15:28 |
|
oleonard |
No more touring for me... |
| 15:28 |
|
cait |
me neither |
| 15:28 |
|
cait |
but some more days of vacation at least |
| 15:29 |
|
oleonard |
I'm having a weird permissions issue today... I can't see Recalls stuff even though I'm logged in as a superlibrarian |
| 15:34 |
|
cait |
and turned it on too? |
| 15:34 |
|
oleonard |
it must be some kind of data problem because it works with the sample data |
| 15:35 |
|
cait |
where are you not seeing them? |
| 15:35 |
|
oleonard |
The links on circulation home page |
| 15:35 |
|
cait |
very odd |
| 15:41 |
|
oleonard |
Using a slightly older version of my test data clears it up but I sure wish I knew what it was about. |
| 15:53 |
|
eythian |
tcohen: https://gitlab.com/koha-commun[…]ocker/-/issues/19 I found the cause of your issue with docker swarm |
| 16:35 |
|
|
Kolvir joined #koha |
| 16:37 |
|
Kolvir |
I can not find this error from the MARC bibliographic framework test. Can someone please giveme some ideas on how to track it down? ALL items fields MUST : be mapped to the same tag, and they must all be in the 10 (items) tab |
| 16:38 |
|
Kolvir |
I've dug through the 952 field and compared it to the default framework, but can't see any differences |
| 16:40 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
Kolvir->do you have everything in the 952 tag and subfields pointing to the 10 tab? |
| 16:42 |
|
Kolvir |
yes |
| 16:47 |
|
cait |
maybe you have an items field mapped to a field that is not a 952? |
| 16:47 |
|
cait |
check the koha-to-marc mappings |
| 16:48 |
|
Kolvir |
ok, will check that |
| 16:57 |
|
Kolvir |
That was it, thank you. |
| 16:58 |
|
cait |
:) |
| 17:02 |
|
Kolvir |
I was trying to get the DDC call number from 082a displayed in the holdings table instead of the one that shows up, they don't match exactly |
| 17:02 |
|
cait |
yes, don't do that |
| 17:03 |
|
cait |
have a look at the itemcallnumber system preference |
| 17:03 |
|
cait |
it can help you with cataloguing, it will show the 082a if you add a new item, helping you with filling the callnumber in the item |
| 17:04 |
|
cait |
also make sure to set up $2 cn_source with ddc (administration > classification sources) |
| 17:04 |
|
cait |
it will help you get proper sorting for your callnumbers |
| 17:09 |
|
Kolvir |
I've got 082a in the itemcallnumber system preference, but am not seeing where/how to set up $2 cn_source with ddc . I'm looking at Administration -> Classification Configuration |
| 17:09 |
|
cait |
one moment |
| 17:10 |
|
cait |
are you only using ddc? |
| 17:10 |
|
Kolvir |
yes |
| 17:10 |
|
cait |
ok |
| 17:10 |
|
cait |
so in classification sources, make the "in use" only yes for dd |
| 17:10 |
|
cait |
c |
| 17:10 |
|
Kolvir |
ok |
| 17:10 |
|
cait |
then set the DefaultClassificationSource system preference also to ddc |
| 17:11 |
|
Kolvir |
ok |
| 17:11 |
|
cait |
so now you are set up for any new items |
| 17:11 |
|
cait |
do you have a lof ot items already? |
| 17:11 |
|
Kolvir |
that's how it was already set |
| 17:11 |
|
Kolvir |
no |
| 17:12 |
|
cait |
oh that's good then :) |
| 17:12 |
|
Kolvir |
50-60 |
| 17:12 |
|
cait |
ah, so what happens is when you catalog: |
| 17:12 |
|
Kolvir |
cataloging starts this week |
| 17:12 |
|
Kolvir |
had to move to a new computer |
| 17:12 |
|
cait |
the itemcallnumber is put in items.itemcallnumber |
| 17:12 |
|
cait |
and then koha creates a sorting form of your itemcallnumber from cn_sort in cn_source |
| 17:12 |
|
cait |
this is used for invnetory |
| 17:12 |
|
cait |
or when sorting tables on callnumber |
| 17:13 |
|
cait |
so good to have that set up correctly :) |
| 17:13 |
|
|
fridolin joined #koha |
| 17:13 |
|
Kolvir |
Ok, thank you! |
| 17:13 |
|
cait |
hm from cn_source (classification type) in cn_sort (sortable form) |
| 17:13 |
|
cait |
had them the wrong way |
| 17:14 |
|
cait |
maybe have a look at those columsn in the items table sometime, it should be more easy to understand then |
| 17:15 |
|
Kolvir |
ok |
| 17:17 |
|
Kolvir |
are the koha to mark mapping done after any record being modified by a template when it is saved? What I want to do is drop all 900 fields that come from say a z39.50 search when they are imported. |
| 17:17 |
|
Kolvir |
koha to marc I mean |
| 17:19 |
|
cait |
the fields in biblio, biblioitems and filled/updated when you update/add a bibliographic record |
| 17:19 |
|
cait |
the fields in items when you add/edit an item |
| 17:19 |
|
cait |
not sure what you mean with the dropping |
| 17:19 |
|
cait |
do you mean delete all 9xx from incoming records? |
| 17:20 |
|
Kolvir |
yes |
| 17:21 |
|
cait |
you can use an XSLT template for that |
| 17:21 |
|
cait |
the mappings won't help with it |
| 17:21 |
|
cait |
check the manual for the XSLT template setting in z39.50, we might have an existing one to do that alredy |
| 17:21 |
|
Kolvir |
I didn't want a mod template to interfere with the fields koha adds to 952 |
| 17:21 |
|
cait |
ah no that won't happen |
| 17:22 |
|
cait |
items work a bit different |
| 17:22 |
|
cait |
the 952 is not part of your records |
| 17:22 |
|
cait |
they are only added when you export |
| 17:22 |
|
cait |
either to the search engine or when using the export tool |
| 17:22 |
|
cait |
if you look at biblio_metadata.metadata at the sorted marcxml record, they are not there |
| 17:23 |
|
Kolvir |
great. That's what I needed to know. |
| 17:23 |
|
cait |
sorted = stored |
| 18:16 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
Is it ok to post a problem I'm having with importing Marc records here? I got the recommendation from the listserv. |
| 18:17 |
|
bag |
yes please |
| 18:18 |
|
cait |
always just ask, if someone around can help, they will :) |
| 18:24 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
Awesome. So here's the bg info. We're moving from Follett Destiny to a self hosted Koha instance. I've exported all my MARC records for my two libraries and am attempting to import them into Koha. We're talking around 23k records for one library and 11k for the other (2 branches I guess if I'm to use the correct terminology.) I noticed a couple of issues right away. 1. I had to make the branch codes match up to whats in Koha so I used |
| 18:24 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
MarcEdit to do that and then 2. I noticed that Follett exported item info using 852 instead of 952 so I had to change that. Those two changes got me a step further so that when I staged the records for import, Koha was seeing BOTH, meaning on the managed staged imports screen, it gave me values in both the # Records AND # Items columns. Previous to those changes, I only got values in # Records column. However, when I go to import the |
| 18:24 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
batch, it just immediately says it fails on the job screen. I've tried breaking it down using Marc split to files of 1000 and that didn't help. I've perused the logs in CLI and don't see anything immediately popping out as the issue. |
| 18:25 |
|
cait |
let me get back to you in a moment |
| 18:26 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
cait:resolved the 100's of repeating itemtypes in the dropdown. |
| 18:28 |
|
bag |
KevinFurst[m]: sounds like maybe a bad record in there? |
| 18:28 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
Everything else seems to be ok in Koha and works. I'm using a server with 8GB of mem and it doesn't seemed pegged when I run the job. There's nothing else running on that machine. I did try a job of 10 or 11 records and it would import them but in scanning the fields between the two, I don't see anything really sticking out as materially different between the records that worked and those in the general file that fails every time on |
| 18:28 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
import. |
| 18:28 |
|
wahanui |
i think import is what I'm trying to figure out |
| 18:28 |
|
bag |
can you valid the mrc format? |
| 18:30 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
I have run the validate marc records tool in marc edit and then used the "Clean" file it generated as the one I try in Koha. In the "error" file MarcEdit puts the bad records into, it's like 1 or 2 records, that's it. |
| 18:31 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
If there is a bad record in there, am I correct that Koha wouldn't find it in the import/staging portion and would only find it on import? And it wouldn't just ignore that bad record, it would cause the entire job to error out? |
| 18:31 |
|
cait |
hm it could be the items |
| 18:31 |
|
cait |
do you have an example 952 you could share? |
| 18:31 |
|
cait |
i might be able to tell you what's missing |
| 18:31 |
|
cait |
but basically you want a b y to match exactly what you configured in Koha (homebranch, holdingbranch and itemtype) |
| 18:31 |
|
cait |
case sensitive etc. exact match on the codes |
| 18:31 |
|
cait |
I recommend to also add a $2 with your classification scheme - it will make Koha create a sortable form or your callnumber on import, which is used by inventory etc. - it can be done later, but it's easy that way |
| 18:31 |
|
cait |
fi you are using ddc that woudl be $2ddc |
| 18:31 |
|
cait |
KevinFurst[m]: ^any of that make sense to you? |
| 18:31 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
Yes. Give me a few minutes to work through that with my file. |
| 18:32 |
|
cait |
I am not sure about how it deals with errors, but I remember we could do a little better there |
| 18:32 |
|
cait |
are you aware that there are also command line scripts for the staged marc import? |
| 18:32 |
|
cait |
and a bulkmarcimport tool |
| 18:32 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
One thing I noticed right away is that my file doesn't have a b for current library so I went in and deselected it as mandatory, leaving a home branch as both mandatory and made sure it matched correct values. Is b required no matter what? |
| 18:33 |
|
cait |
yes |
| 18:33 |
|
cait |
definitely |
| 18:33 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
No I wasn't aware of that. |
| 18:33 |
|
cait |
make it mandatory again and set it in all your items |
| 18:33 |
|
cait |
a and b can match, that#s no issue |
| 18:33 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
ok. Gonna try that. |
| 18:33 |
|
cait |
so maybe you can just copy/shift with MARCEdit |
| 18:33 |
|
cait |
koha doesn't like items with missing a b and y |
| 18:33 |
|
cait |
so even if you got them in, they would give you some trouble |
| 18:34 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
The default value "itemtypes" that doesn't exist in the table authorised_values is the culprit. The framework 952y points to this value called "itemtypes". I can't find it's source, so i can only assume it's pointing to some stored procedure to retrieve itemtypes. I had to create a new authorised value of "itemtype2" and recreate the itemtypes in here and reconfigure my custom framework 952y to point to this new authorised value. |
| 18:34 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
works fine now. |
| 18:35 |
|
cait |
not uqite |
| 18:37 |
|
cait |
itemtypes are a pseudo-av |
| 18:37 |
|
cait |
they are set not in authorised values but in administration > itemtypes |
| 18:37 |
|
cait |
don't change the frameworks there, defualt is correct |
| 18:37 |
|
cait |
and please undo that change |
| 18:37 |
|
cait |
it is also set to give you tons of trouble |
| 18:37 |
|
wahanui |
okay, cait. |
| 18:37 |
|
cait |
same for a and b - pseudo-AV is set to branches, not found as an AV category but in administration > libraries |
| 18:37 |
|
cait |
for both of you.. please be super careful about changing frameworks especially in the beginning |
| 18:41 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
itemtypes is putting over 100 duplicate MAIN COLLECTION entries into the dropdown and the html source code proves that. My itemtypes are only 15 unique entries. So pseudo-av or not, it doesn't work. |
| 18:42 |
|
cait |
i believe your problem might be more realted to the change |
| 18:42 |
|
cait |
honestly, don't do that, if it's duplicateing, we need to fix that otherwise |
| 18:42 |
|
cait |
changing the mapping will break things |
| 18:44 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
it shouldn't break things. It's allowing me to choose from a valid authorised value. I'm not doubting you, but just stating it shouldn't break things. I didn't alter the default framework. I've been using a custom framework for sometime now with no problems. |
| 18:45 |
|
cait |
itemtype in items is used for all kinds of stuff |
| 18:45 |
|
cait |
and it expects valid itemtype codes |
| 18:45 |
|
cait |
and might look at the mapping to figure out things |
| 18:45 |
|
cait |
I can't tell you which side effects exactly, but I expect some or many in circulation |
| 18:45 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
oh, then, i'm not worried. I pretty much duplicated my original administration->item types |
| 18:46 |
|
cait |
well you didn#t change hte db field... but it's really just a band aid if that works |
| 18:46 |
|
cait |
it would be better to get to the source of the duplicates |
| 18:46 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
i agree, it's definitely a tail wagging the dog situation here. |
| 18:47 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
I'm a seasoned 35 year developer and DBA. So i'm comfortable peeking anywhere anyone has a suggestion. |
| 18:47 |
|
cait |
the code for building the item form is not super nice |
| 18:48 |
|
cait |
well say it's a bit complex |
| 18:48 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
additem.pl? |
| 18:48 |
|
cait |
yeah, but it's a method in C4 |
| 18:49 |
|
cait |
the older part, I was just trying to spot it for you |
| 18:49 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
ok. |
| 18:50 |
|
cait |
Template file: https://git.koha-community.org[…]oguing/additem.tt |
| 18:50 |
|
cait |
.pl: https://git.koha-community.org[…]oguing/additem.pl |
| 18:53 |
|
cait |
i might have been thinking of the code that builds the item forms in serials/acq |
| 18:53 |
|
cait |
it looks like the cod emight be all in additem.pl |
| 18:54 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
<select name="item_group" id="item-group-add-or-create-form-select"> |
| 18:54 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
<optgroup label="Use existing item group"> |
| 18:54 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
[% FOREACH ig IN item_groups %] |
| 18:54 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
<option value="[% ig.id | html %]">[% ig.description | html %]</option> |
| 18:54 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
[% END %] |
| 18:54 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
</optgroup> |
| 18:54 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
<optgroup label="Other options"> |
| 18:54 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
<option id="item-group-add-or-create-form-no-add" value="">Do not add to item group</option> |
| 18:54 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
<option value="create">Create new item group</option> |
| 18:54 |
|
cait |
but htat's item groups |
| 18:54 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
</optgroup> |
| 18:54 |
|
cait |
not itemtypes |
| 18:54 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
</select> |
| 18:54 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
this is where the dropdown derives it's options. |
| 18:54 |
|
cait |
nope |
| 18:54 |
|
cait |
that#s a drop down below hte form |
| 18:56 |
|
cait |
it appears below the item form |
| 18:56 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
oh yeah. my bad. |
| 19:05 |
|
cait |
it's probably in here: [% PROCESS subfields_for_item subfields => subfields %] |
| 19:07 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
in the additem.tt? |
| 19:08 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
or pl |
| 19:08 |
|
cait |
tempate code is here: https://git.koha-community.org[…]l_helpers.inc#L85 |
| 19:09 |
|
cait |
the additem.tt has the PROCESS line and the link above the template code for the form |
| 19:13 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
they both look correct. I did see a JS reference to acquisitions, which is just in beta right now. |
| 19:13 |
|
cait |
beta? |
| 19:13 |
|
wahanui |
i guess beta is OK |
| 19:13 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
but I think this issue has been happening since inception, just never went deep dive on the issue. |
| 19:14 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
yeah, we have a test fund, test budget, edifact enabled, but not much further after that. test vendor. but no orders or baskets created. It was for generating a training video. |
| 19:15 |
|
cait |
ah |
| 19:19 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
not seeing anything special in procedures or functions in db level. |
| 19:19 |
|
RudyHinojosa |
i am using mariadb, just to mention. |
| 19:22 |
|
cait |
yeah, that's what most of us do |
| 19:23 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
cait: I rechecked with MARC validator in MARCedit again to be sure. There were no erroneous records to remove. I added both b and y subfields with data that matched the codes in the authorized values for each. Uploaded and results came up with 23k records and 19k items which is right. Went to import and it immediately failed again. Here is an example of a 952 I'm using =952 \\$p3222200006331O$aPRBE$g5.00USD$hFIC Bya$yBOOKS$bPRBE |
| 19:25 |
|
cait |
hm |
| 19:25 |
|
cait |
ah yes |
| 19:25 |
|
cait |
$g |
| 19:25 |
|
cait |
that is price eh? |
| 19:25 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
right |
| 19:25 |
|
cait |
it's a datatype of decimal |
| 19:25 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
ahh |
| 19:25 |
|
cait |
you can't use the USD there |
| 19:25 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
yep. will change now |
| 19:26 |
|
cait |
your $h looks like it maybe is more a $o |
| 19:26 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
is location and call number. So h or o? |
| 19:26 |
|
cait |
$o is the callnumber |
| 19:27 |
|
cait |
$h is enumchron - used by serials to put the issue information in |
| 19:27 |
|
cait |
or for volumes |
| 19:27 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
got it. |
| 19:27 |
|
cait |
that would not prevent it from loading, but it would make sense to switch it |
| 19:27 |
|
cait |
and you are not using DDC it looks like? |
| 19:27 |
|
cait |
is that one of the other big classifications? |
| 19:29 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
FIC is just section + Auth name. Non fic is classified via DDC here |
| 19:30 |
|
cait |
ah ok |
| 19:30 |
|
cait |
I was wondering because of the $2 i told you about |
| 19:31 |
|
cait |
that makes Koha create a sortable form of the callnumber |
| 19:31 |
|
cait |
your FIC might work best with $2z = generic and the others with $2ddc |
| 19:33 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
ok good to know. I'm making changes now and will try another stage and import. |
| 19:35 |
|
|
khall joined #koha |
| 20:21 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
Still failed. An example of what 952 looks like now |
| 20:21 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
=952 \$p34517200027251$aPRBE$g8.99$yBOOKS$bPRBE$o597.3 Pop pb |
| 20:21 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
I took out the USD and moved the h to o |
| 20:28 |
|
|
jalway joined #koha |
| 20:30 |
|
jalway |
We have two issues: #1 Trouble with Importing Patrons #2 Incorrect Koha to MARC mappings. Anyone around who wouldn't mind helping me get things figured out? |
| 20:31 |
|
jalway |
The #2 is more of a would I break anything, if I just changed the mapping to the correct form . . . |
| 20:51 |
|
cait |
KevinFurst[m]: odd :( maybe try with a smaller sample to get format right first? |
| 20:52 |
|
cait |
you could check the logs to see if something is there |
| 20:52 |
|
cait |
it looks fine now to me |
| 20:52 |
|
cait |
try without the item... try with it, try some combinations to limit it down a bit more |
| 20:53 |
|
cait |
it's really late here so I am about to leave, but more people around in a few hours maybe |
| 20:53 |
|
KevinFurst[m] |
Thanks for your help today |
| 21:42 |
|
|
fridolin joined #koha |
| 22:12 |
|
|
rudyh joined #koha |
| 22:12 |
|
|
RudyHinojosa joined #koha |
