| Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:17 |
|
|
hayley joined #koha |
| 00:34 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 00:35 |
|
|
wizzyrea joined #koha |
| 00:45 |
|
|
hayleymapley_ joined #koha |
| 01:02 |
|
|
hayley joined #koha |
| 01:20 |
|
|
kathryn joined #koha |
| 01:34 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 02:34 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 03:34 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 04:35 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 05:35 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 06:00 |
|
|
chriss joined #koha |
| 06:35 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 06:48 |
|
|
chriss joined #koha |
| 06:48 |
|
|
nlegrand joined #koha |
| 06:48 |
|
|
magnuse joined #koha |
| 06:55 |
|
|
chriss joined #koha |
| 06:55 |
|
|
nlegrand joined #koha |
| 06:55 |
|
|
magnuse joined #koha |
| 07:01 |
|
|
nlegrand_ joined #koha |
| 07:09 |
|
|
cait joined #koha |
| 07:13 |
|
|
davidnind joined #koha |
| 07:24 |
|
|
chriss2 joined #koha |
| 07:26 |
|
ashimema |
Morning #koha |
| 07:35 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 07:38 |
|
|
sophie_m joined #koha |
| 07:43 |
|
ashimema |
@later tell mtj sorry dude, looks like the most recent packaging changes have had unexpected consequences.. we dont seem to be pulling in all our dependancies in koha-testing-docker anymore |
| 07:43 |
|
huginn |
ashimema: The operation succeeded. |
| 07:43 |
|
|
did joined #koha |
| 07:46 |
|
|
reiveune joined #koha |
| 07:47 |
|
reiveune |
hello |
| 07:47 |
|
|
magnuse joined #koha |
| 07:58 |
|
|
kohaputti joined #koha |
| 07:59 |
|
|
sophie_m joined #koha |
| 08:01 |
|
|
alex_a joined #koha |
| 08:01 |
|
alex_a |
Bonjour |
| 08:02 |
|
|
did joined #koha |
| 08:18 |
|
kohaputti |
Joubu, line 439: https://gitlab.com/joubu/Koha/[…]73695b1d9_440_439 |
| 08:18 |
|
kohaputti |
Joubu, s/reservecount ne ''/allowedreserves ne ''/ ? |
| 08:19 |
|
|
greenjimll joined #koha |
| 08:19 |
|
Joubu |
let me check that |
| 08:20 |
|
Joubu |
it is $allowedreserves, indeed |
| 08:21 |
|
Joubu |
kohaputti: commit amended |
| 08:22 |
|
kohaputti |
Joubu, did you check whether smart-rules.pl now adds the rule with value ''? |
| 08:25 |
|
Joubu |
I created a rule and all the empty values were "" |
| 08:25 |
|
Joubu |
so yes |
| 08:27 |
|
|
theodoros joined #koha |
| 08:31 |
|
|
fridolin joined #koha |
| 08:31 |
|
|
andreashm joined #koha |
| 08:32 |
|
fridolin |
hihi |
| 08:35 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 08:44 |
|
|
andreashm joined #koha |
| 08:45 |
|
|
chriss joined #koha |
| 08:47 |
|
|
cait joined #koha |
| 09:04 |
|
|
fridolin1 joined #koha |
| 09:12 |
|
huginn |
News from kohagit: Bug 20847: Add more fields to the Batch Patron Modification tool <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]38fdf56b94ba15d52> |
| 09:12 |
|
huginn |
News from kohagit: Bug 13121: Move search results "action" links ("Place hold," "Add tag," etc) into... <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]081eafa6a96cfdce9> |
| 09:12 |
|
huginn |
News from kohagit: Bug 23947: Phase out jquery.cookie.js: Authority merge <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]154b82d42051b9c4a> |
| 09:12 |
|
huginn |
News from kohagit: Bug 23944: (follow-up) Update circulation to use new library <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]83fe605cd27cd40ac> |
| 09:12 |
|
huginn |
News from kohagit: Bug 23944: Phase out use of jquery.cookie.js in favor of js.cookie.js <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]84693b5058ca5fdbd> |
| 09:12 |
|
huginn |
News from kohagit: Bug 23885: Move staff client search results JavaScript into separate file <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]65d0b4f9a1fd70ad9> |
| 09:12 |
|
huginn |
News from kohagit: Bug 23856: Split author and ISBN/ISSN out of citation in staged MARC record management <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]dba9ad44d00c53083> |
| 09:28 |
|
|
fridolin joined #koha |
| 09:29 |
|
|
andreashm joined #koha |
| 09:35 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 09:50 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D8 build #645: STILL UNSTABLE in 37 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_Master_D8/645/ |
| 09:52 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9_MDB_Latest build #95: STILL UNSTABLE in 39 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]D9_MDB_Latest/95/ |
| 09:54 |
|
|
JesseM_ joined #koha |
| 10:01 |
|
|
fridolin joined #koha |
| 10:08 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9_My8 build #116: STILL UNSTABLE in 56 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]aster_D9_My8/116/ |
| 10:20 |
|
huginn |
News from kohagit: Bug 24305: (follow-up) Remove previous declaration of batch_biblionumbers <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]25876fcff752a5737> |
| 10:21 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D10 build #91: STILL FAILING in 10 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_Master_D10/91/ |
| 10:28 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D10 build #92: ABORTED in 1 min 38 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_Master_D10/92/ |
| 10:34 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_U18 build #578: STILL UNSTABLE in 42 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_U18/578/ |
| 10:36 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 10:39 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9 build #1108: STILL UNSTABLE in 49 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_D9/1108/ |
| 10:43 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_19.11_D10 build #2: FAILURE in 10 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]Koha_19.11_D10/2/ |
| 10:50 |
|
|
xoan joined #koha |
| 11:08 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_19.11_D10 build #3: ABORTED in 2 min 20 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]Koha_19.11_D10/3/ |
| 11:09 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_19.11_D10 build #4: STILL FAILING in 36 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]Koha_19.11_D10/4/ |
| 11:11 |
|
|
reiveune left #koha |
| 11:14 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D8 build #646: STILL UNSTABLE in 34 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_Master_D8/646/ |
| 11:17 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9_My8 build #117: STILL UNSTABLE in 55 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]aster_D9_My8/117/ |
| 11:17 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_19.11_D10 build #5: STILL FAILING in 33 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]Koha_19.11_D10/5/ |
| 11:27 |
|
|
xoan joined #koha |
| 11:27 |
|
|
reiveune joined #koha |
| 11:30 |
|
|
davidnind left #koha |
| 11:34 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_19.11_D10 build #6: STILL FAILING in 8 min 54 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]Koha_19.11_D10/6/ |
| 11:34 |
|
huginn |
News from kohagit: Bug 23493: (follow-up) Disable rowGroup on due date sort <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]00c2966a93e10628a> |
| 11:34 |
|
huginn |
News from kohagit: Bug 23493: (follow-up) Switch to aDataSort for multi-column sorting <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]4986f3baaee72b4ad> |
| 11:34 |
|
huginn |
News from kohagit: Bug 23493: Replace rowGrouping with rowGroup <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]e90701493fdbc71b6> |
| 11:36 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 11:42 |
|
mtj |
hi ashimema, sorry about the error... i fiddled with the dev repos and broken the build |
| 11:42 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9 build #1109: FAILURE in 25 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_D9/1109/ |
| 11:42 |
|
ashimema |
no worries |
| 11:42 |
|
mtj |
... i'll leave those repos as-is, for now |
| 11:42 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_U18 build #579: FAILURE in 28 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_U18/579/ |
| 11:42 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9_MDB_Latest build #96: FAILURE in 32 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]D9_MDB_Latest/96/ |
| 11:42 |
|
ashimema |
I just wasn't sure how to fix it |
| 11:42 |
|
cait |
@dnind |
| 11:42 |
|
huginn |
cait: downloading the Perl source |
| 11:42 |
|
cait |
@seen davidn |
| 11:42 |
|
huginn |
cait: I have not seen davidn. |
| 11:43 |
|
cait |
@seen dnind |
| 11:43 |
|
huginn |
cait: I have not seen dnind. |
| 11:43 |
|
cait |
hm i need to give him karma! |
| 11:43 |
|
ashimema |
lol |
| 11:43 |
|
mtj |
hi cait, nick is davidnind, i think :) |
| 11:45 |
|
mtj |
ashimema: i havent anticipated a buster error would break the whole pipeline |
| 11:45 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D8 build #647: FAILURE in 32 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_Master_D8/647/ |
| 11:45 |
|
|
fridolin left #koha |
| 11:46 |
|
cait |
@seen davidnind |
| 11:46 |
|
huginn |
cait: davidnind was last seen in #koha 1 day, 17 hours, 53 minutes, and 47 seconds ago: <davidnind> You're welcome - didn't quite get it down to under 10 needing sign-off :) |
| 11:46 |
|
cait |
and you are so right :) |
| 11:46 |
|
cait |
davidnind++ mtj++ ashimema++ |
| 11:46 |
|
ashimema |
? |
| 11:46 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9 build #1110: STILL FAILING in 1 min 10 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_D9/1110/ |
| 11:47 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9_My8 build #118: FAILURE in 31 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]aster_D9_My8/118/ |
| 11:48 |
|
|
khall joined #koha |
| 11:49 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_U18 build #580: STILL FAILING in 1 min 30 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_U18/580/ |
| 11:49 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9_MDB_Latest build #97: STILL FAILING in 31 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]D9_MDB_Latest/97/ |
| 11:51 |
|
|
koha-jenkins joined #koha |
| 11:56 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D8 build #648: STILL FAILING in 4 min 19 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_Master_D8/648/ |
| 11:59 |
|
tcohen |
morning |
| 12:00 |
|
ashimema |
mornin' tcohen |
| 12:02 |
|
tcohen |
hi ashimema |
| 12:03 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_U18 build #581: STILL FAILING in 10 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_U18/581/ |
| 12:04 |
|
|
khall joined #koha |
| 12:07 |
|
|
andreashm joined #koha |
| 12:16 |
|
tcohen |
@seen Joubu |
| 12:16 |
|
huginn |
tcohen: Joubu was last seen in #koha 3 hours, 51 minutes, and 29 seconds ago: <Joubu> so yes |
| 12:17 |
|
Joubu |
tcohen: que tal? |
| 12:18 |
|
tcohen |
I'm done with the _count patch |
| 12:18 |
|
tcohen |
submitting in a minute |
| 12:23 |
|
ere |
ashimema: I added my proposal to bug 22522. As far as I can see we can support a wide range of Mojolicious::Plugin::OpenAPI versions with quite minor changes, but if I were to make the call I'd up the version requirement to at least 1.x where x is at least 28. |
| 12:23 |
|
huginn |
Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]_bug.cgi?id=22522 is not accessible. |
| 12:24 |
|
ashimema |
thanks for investigating ere |
| 12:24 |
|
ashimema |
:) |
| 12:27 |
|
|
oleonard joined #koha |
| 12:28 |
|
vfernandes |
the link "Limit to currently available items" limits the search to the items where onloan is false... shouldn't list the items where onloan and notforloan are false? |
| 12:28 |
|
vfernandes |
the link appears on search results facets |
| 12:28 |
|
ere |
ashimema: my pleasure really, since I've stumbled on this now at least twice and forgotten the solution in between :D |
| 12:31 |
|
kohaputti |
ashimema, it feels like every other db_dependent test fails for me. Something wrong in my environment or is this the status of current master? |
| 12:31 |
|
kohaputti |
using ubuntu 18.04 / devbox |
| 12:32 |
|
ashimema |
jenkins isn't happy at the moment.. i believe mtj is working on that |
| 12:32 |
|
ashimema |
as for testing locally.. I'm not seeing that.. but I am seeing the odd random failure |
| 12:33 |
|
kohaputti |
ashimema, do you run "prove t/db_dependent" ? |
| 12:33 |
|
ashimema |
indeed |
| 12:33 |
|
oleonard |
Hi all |
| 12:34 |
|
ashimema |
when was the last time you reset_all? |
| 12:34 |
|
ashimema |
running inside koha-testing-docker on on your own environment |
| 12:34 |
|
kohaputti |
ashimema, I'm actually running the tests still with the circ rule patches, but I don't think they can cause such a mess |
| 12:34 |
|
kohaputti |
I will now try vanilla master |
| 12:35 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9_My8 build #120: NOW UNSTABLE in 39 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]aster_D9_My8/120/ |
| 12:36 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 12:36 |
|
kohaputti |
well, during the past few days there has been bunch of fixes for the tests soo the Joubu's branch was rebased just before those |
| 12:37 |
|
kohaputti |
Joubu, maybe do another rebase? |
| 12:37 |
|
|
andreashm joined #koha |
| 12:40 |
|
|
khall joined #koha |
| 12:41 |
|
mtj |
hi tcohen, i added an extra docker4 node to jenkins.. i wonder if its caused jenkins master-node to run out of memory? |
| 12:42 |
|
tcohen |
not sure? |
| 12:42 |
|
* tcohen |
has been abducted by code this morning |
| 12:44 |
|
ashimema |
i'm running a `prove -vv -r t/db_ependant/` now just to double check kohaputti |
| 12:44 |
|
ashimema |
so far it's passing.. but obviously take a while to run |
| 12:44 |
|
kohaputti |
ashimema, I had changed quite a lot circ rules and sysprefs in my run so that could make a difference |
| 12:45 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9 build #1111: NOW UNSTABLE in 53 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_D9/1111/ |
| 12:45 |
|
kohaputti |
but it should not make a difference, if it does the test should be fixed IMO |
| 12:45 |
|
tcohen |
that means some test expects somethings from the data on the DB |
| 12:52 |
|
ashimema |
yup |
| 12:53 |
|
ashimema |
the db_dependant tests really do rely heavily upon the default test dataset ;) |
| 12:53 |
|
ashimema |
yes.. we should fix that.. but it's been in the long list of things to do since I first started working on koha nearly a decade ago.. ;) |
| 12:54 |
|
ashimema |
we get round it by using koha-testing-docker and reset_all and friends |
| 12:54 |
|
ashimema |
misc4dev is the key peice.. it's what populates the database with a test database |
| 12:55 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9_MDB_Latest build #98: ABORTED in 49 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]D9_MDB_Latest/98/ |
| 12:57 |
|
|
khall joined #koha |
| 12:57 |
|
kohaputti |
ashimema, do you see the endless amount of warnings during tests? |
| 12:58 |
|
ashimema |
i see occasional warning.. not an enless list |
| 12:58 |
|
kohaputti |
ok, maybe for me occasional = endless :D |
| 13:00 |
|
ashimema |
https://jenkins.koha-community[…]Build/consoleText |
| 13:01 |
|
kohaputti |
yup, that's what I see also |
| 13:01 |
|
kohaputti |
soo I think my issues with the tests were either that the circ rule refactoring breaks everything or my changes to circ rules and sysprefs break everything |
| 13:01 |
|
ashimema |
so there are warnings certainly.. and we should get round to fixing them all.. |
| 13:01 |
|
ashimema |
but I don't believe any of them are critical ones as such |
| 13:02 |
|
ashimema |
Joubu and marcelr have fixed a fair few already that I've spotted |
| 13:03 |
|
ashimema |
the ones in C4::Reserves are pretty noisy we should fix those |
| 13:07 |
|
|
paul_p joined #koha |
| 13:08 |
|
|
fridolin joined #koha |
| 13:11 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D8 build #649: NOW UNSTABLE in 37 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_Master_D8/649/ |
| 13:13 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_U18 build #582: STILL FAILING in 5 min 48 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_U18/582/ |
| 13:14 |
|
magnuse |
weird, i have a oai-pmh set mapping with three "rules", all based on a value in the same marc field and subfield (347$b). the first two take effect, but the last one seems to be ignored. tried adding a fourth rule, but it's not just a case of "the last rule being ignored" |
| 13:18 |
|
mtj |
hmm, jenkins seems to be happy again.. no random java OOM errors now |
| 13:20 |
|
magnuse |
jenkins++ |
| 13:23 |
|
mtj |
ere, many thanks for your mojo fixes... they look promising :0) |
| 13:23 |
|
ere |
mtj: thanks |
| 13:27 |
|
|
marcelr joined #koha |
| 13:27 |
|
ashimema |
kohaputti bug 24529 :) |
| 13:27 |
|
huginn |
Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]_bug.cgi?id=24529 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, martin.renvoize, Needs Signoff , Uninitialised value warnings in C4::Reserves |
| 13:27 |
|
marcelr |
o/ |
| 13:28 |
|
marcelr |
ashimema: i copied on a report that is about one line of code and was waiting for 3 months (frustration management here) |
| 13:28 |
|
marcelr |
copied you |
| 13:28 |
|
ashimema |
bug? |
| 13:28 |
|
wahanui |
bug is, like, that perl code is not activ since its not in PER5LIB |
| 13:28 |
|
marcelr |
23896 |
| 13:28 |
|
ashimema |
my inbox is pretty perminently full at the minute ;) |
| 13:29 |
|
marcelr |
and i spammed the list for another one |
| 13:29 |
|
marcelr |
dont like waiting for more than 3 months on reports generally |
| 13:29 |
|
marcelr |
it takes just too long |
| 13:32 |
|
Joubu |
marcelr: I was not aware of 23896, also no occurrence in my inbox |
| 13:33 |
|
marcelr |
No i copied ashimema |
| 13:33 |
|
marcelr |
on the bug report |
| 13:34 |
|
marcelr |
didnt want to distract you from solving all the other bugs :) |
| 13:35 |
|
marcelr |
but this one is a nice example how we can scare anyone away from submitting a patch in the first place |
| 13:36 |
|
marcelr |
Joubu: lol that was fast |
| 13:36 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 13:36 |
|
marcelr |
did you see comment4 on the report btw? it justifies the absence of a test |
| 13:37 |
|
marcelr |
i considered it as out of balance |
| 13:37 |
|
ashimema |
I saw it and was going to let it through without a test.. |
| 13:37 |
|
ashimema |
thoughts Joubu.. ? |
| 13:38 |
|
marcelr |
^^ |
| 13:39 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9_MDB_Latest build #99: NOW UNSTABLE in 37 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]D9_MDB_Latest/99/ |
| 13:44 |
|
|
Dyrcona joined #koha |
| 13:47 |
|
Joubu |
ashimema: will have a loo |
| 13:47 |
|
Joubu |
k |
| 13:47 |
|
ashimema |
ta |
| 13:49 |
|
Joubu |
I thought Log.t was doing it already, but it does not |
| 13:55 |
|
ashimema |
indeed |
| 13:55 |
|
|
khall joined #koha |
| 13:56 |
|
tcohen |
hi marcelr! |
| 13:56 |
|
marcelr |
hi tcohen |
| 13:57 |
|
|
thd joined #koha |
| 13:57 |
|
|
davidnind joined #koha |
| 14:00 |
|
ashimema |
ooh.. nearly meeting time.. |
| 14:00 |
|
ashimema |
I forgots again |
| 14:00 |
|
ashimema |
#startmeeting Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020 |
| 14:00 |
|
huginn |
Meeting started Wed Jan 29 14:00:50 2020 UTC. The chair is ashimema. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. |
| 14:00 |
|
huginn |
Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. |
| 14:00 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now (Meeting topic: Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020) |
| 14:00 |
|
huginn |
The meeting name has been set to 'development_irc_meeting_29_january_2020' |
| 14:00 |
|
ashimema |
#link https://wiki.koha-community.or[…]g_29_January_2020 Agenda |
| 14:01 |
|
ashimema |
#topic Introductions |
| 14:01 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now Introductions (Meeting topic: Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020) |
| 14:01 |
|
ashimema |
#info please use "#info" in front of your introduction to have it show up in the automatic minutes |
| 14:01 |
|
oleonard |
#info Owen Leonard, Athens County Public Libraries, Ohio, USA |
| 14:01 |
|
marcelr |
#info Marcel de Rooy Rijksmuseum |
| 14:01 |
|
ashimema |
#info Martin Renvoize, PTFS Europe |
| 14:02 |
|
thd |
#info Thomas Dukleth, Agogme, New York City |
| 14:02 |
|
Joubu |
#info Jonathan Druart |
| 14:02 |
|
Joubu |
qa_team? |
| 14:02 |
|
wahanui |
i guess qa_team is cait Joubu marcelr kohaputti josef_moravec tcohen kidclamp khall |
| 14:02 |
|
Joubu |
rmaints? |
| 14:02 |
|
wahanui |
i guess rmaints is talljoy, lucas, hayley |
| 14:02 |
|
tcohen |
#info Tomas Cohen Arazi, Theke Solutions |
| 14:02 |
|
kidclamp |
#info Nick Clemens, ByWater Solutions |
| 14:02 |
|
kohaputti |
#info Joonas Kylmälä |
| 14:03 |
|
cait |
oh |
| 14:03 |
|
cait |
sorry |
| 14:03 |
|
cait |
#info Katrin Fischer, BSZ, Germany |
| 14:04 |
|
ashimema |
Moving along.. |
| 14:04 |
|
ashimema |
#topic Announcements |
| 14:04 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now Announcements (Meeting topic: Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020) |
| 14:05 |
|
ashimema |
We need to reschedule the GBSD day as I ran out of time to organise it :( |
| 14:06 |
|
cait |
don't beat yourself up, let's set a new date |
| 14:06 |
|
ashimema |
any volunteers to throw a wiki page together and send out a mail to organise one? |
| 14:06 |
|
cait |
marseille is coming up end of march, some time before that would be nice |
| 14:06 |
|
ashimema |
how much warning do people actually need.. 1 week, 2 weeks enough? |
| 14:07 |
|
ashimema |
thinking next thurs/fri or the following week if we want to give more notice |
| 14:07 |
|
cait |
2 weeks might be enough |
| 14:07 |
|
kohaputti |
2 weeks to maximise amount of participants |
| 14:07 |
|
cait |
clear your schedule at work :) |
| 14:08 |
|
fridolin |
good morning all |
| 14:08 |
|
ashimema |
how about 13/14th Feb then? |
| 14:08 |
|
fridolin |
just to say that I will be less on Koha for 3 month |
| 14:08 |
|
fridolin |
good luck to you, long live the community |
| 14:08 |
|
* fridolin |
is flying next week to Madagascar |
| 14:08 |
|
kohaputti |
14th sounds nice |
| 14:09 |
|
fridolin |
see you on WattsApp |
| 14:09 |
|
oleonard |
Send lots of photos fridolin! |
| 14:09 |
|
ashimema |
+1 |
| 14:09 |
|
Joubu |
Enjoy fridolin :) |
| 14:09 |
|
Joubu |
13/14 ok for me as well |
| 14:10 |
|
fridolin |
I will ;) and he will learn Perl programming with math and french ;) |
| 14:10 |
|
cait |
fridolin: save travels and all the best |
| 14:10 |
|
ashimema |
ok.. lets organise GBSD for the 14th |
| 14:10 |
|
ashimema |
#info GBSD rescheduled for the 14th February |
| 14:11 |
|
ashimema |
#info Fridolin will be taking a break from Koha for a few months. He wishes us all the best and will be back :) |
| 14:11 |
|
ashimema |
#topic Update from the RM |
| 14:11 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now Update from the RM (Meeting topic: Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020) |
| 14:12 |
|
|
xoan joined #koha |
| 14:12 |
|
ashimema |
#info The master branch is moving along nicely at the moment with lots having been pushed over the past couple of weeks. Thanks go out the QA team who are diligently working through bugs. |
| 14:13 |
|
ashimema |
#info I am paying close attention to some of the refactoring bugs that are currently making their way through SO/QA and I look forward to pushing them soon. |
| 14:13 |
|
ashimema |
#topic Updates from the RMaints |
| 14:13 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now Updates from the RMaints (Meeting topic: Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020) |
| 14:13 |
|
ashimema |
rmaints? |
| 14:13 |
|
wahanui |
it has been said that rmaints is talljoy, lucas, hayley |
| 14:13 |
|
ashimema |
do we have any here today? |
| 14:15 |
|
kidclamp |
i think early for most of them :-) |
| 14:15 |
|
ashimema |
fair enough.. |
| 14:16 |
|
ashimema |
#info 19.11.02, 19.05.07 and 18.11.13 were all released since the last meeting |
| 14:17 |
|
ashimema |
#topic Updates from the QA team |
| 14:17 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now Updates from the QA team (Meeting topic: Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020) |
| 14:17 |
|
ashimema |
cait |
| 14:17 |
|
cait |
not much more to say than ashimema did already |
| 14:18 |
|
cait |
#info Queues are super full - please all balance your patch writing with sign-offs and QA a bit more! |
| 14:18 |
|
cait |
we are almost touching 100 in Needs QA atm |
| 14:18 |
|
cait |
and the hackfest is coming closer... |
| 14:19 |
|
kohaputti |
cait, on the good side most of those 100 are features and not bugs |
| 14:19 |
|
ashimema |
indeed |
| 14:19 |
|
Joubu |
[or write bugfixes] |
| 14:19 |
|
cait |
#info Stilll over 100 major and critical - we need people working on those, retesting, confirming, fixing etc. |
| 14:19 |
|
marcelr |
this number is not saying that much |
| 14:19 |
|
marcelr |
includes failed qa etc |
| 14:19 |
|
ashimema |
though there are 5 majors in the queue.. I'm sure we should be able to knock them off |
| 14:20 |
|
cait |
yep, but maybe failed qa needs work too? :) |
| 14:20 |
|
cait |
not only adressing the QA team here, i should say |
| 14:20 |
|
marcelr |
in that list they make me ignore the number |
| 14:20 |
|
cait |
testing/confirming can be done by anyone especially |
| 14:20 |
|
ashimema |
indeed |
| 14:20 |
|
kohaputti |
could we recruit more qa? |
| 14:21 |
|
cait |
kohaputti: always keen to |
| 14:21 |
|
cait |
i think adding someone would not require much... finding the volunteers is the hard bit :) |
| 14:21 |
|
Joubu |
we are more lacking testers than QA I'd say |
| 14:21 |
|
marcelr |
kohaputti: thats not always the answer |
| 14:21 |
|
cait |
we need both i'd say |
| 14:21 |
|
marcelr |
you need good people |
| 14:22 |
|
cait |
i am just highlighting a development here - the numbers are much higher which usually indicates longer waiting times too |
| 14:22 |
|
cait |
we had QA around 30 pretty constantly a while ago - but in general bug activity is quite high right now (which is good :) ) |
| 14:23 |
|
cait |
anyway, I think i shoudl stop here :) |
| 14:23 |
|
marcelr |
30 is pretty low btw |
| 14:23 |
|
cait |
yeah, that was a good number, harder to get lower |
| 14:24 |
|
ashimema |
It would be nice to add one or two more to the team for next cycle.. so keep a look out for people who you think may be capable and willing.. |
| 14:24 |
|
ashimema |
qa team tends to be 'by invite', though if someone wants to volunteer out of the blue it all goes to a vote anyways so we can assess |
| 14:25 |
|
cait |
it's not formally by invite... it just happeens people seem to need a bit of a push |
| 14:25 |
|
ashimema |
we have a few great people doing signoff lots at the moment.. David Nind, and Andrew Fuerste-Henry have been storming ahead on that front.. |
| 14:25 |
|
ashimema |
indeed |
| 14:25 |
|
cait |
yeah davidnind++ again :) |
| 14:25 |
|
cait |
andrew too, but not here i think |
| 14:26 |
|
ashimema |
but existing members of the team shouldn't be backwards in coming forwards if you feel there's someone out there who would be a good addition |
| 14:26 |
|
ashimema |
gamification.. remember the leader boards https://dashboard.koha-community.org/ |
| 14:26 |
|
marcelr |
if you remove active signoffers, you have a problem at the other queue |
| 14:26 |
|
cait |
it's true |
| 14:26 |
|
ashimema |
very true |
| 14:26 |
|
cait |
but qa can still signoff |
| 14:26 |
|
* oleonard |
agrees that signoffs have been more needed than QA lately |
| 14:27 |
|
cait |
so we can balance that |
| 14:27 |
|
ashimema |
ok.. moving on |
| 14:27 |
|
ashimema |
#topic General development discussion |
| 14:27 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now General development discussion (Meeting topic: Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020) |
| 14:27 |
|
ashimema |
We didn't get through all the votes last meeting |
| 14:28 |
|
cait |
it was a lot at once... and acq |
| 14:28 |
|
ashimema |
#topic RFC /subscriptions endpoint |
| 14:28 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now RFC /subscriptions endpoint (Meeting topic: Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020) |
| 14:29 |
|
ashimema |
#link https://wiki.koha-community.or[…]ions_endpoint_RFC /subscriptions |
| 14:29 |
|
marcelr |
noting that it wasnt on the agenda? |
| 14:30 |
|
ashimema |
#info There are stll allot of blanks in the mappings table, so rather than vote this week I suggest we all try to find time to take a look at it before the next meeting and help fill in those fields. |
| 14:30 |
|
|
fridolin left #koha |
| 14:30 |
|
ashimema |
I cloned them accross from last meetings agenda just as the meeting started marcelr |
| 14:31 |
|
thd |
unfinished business from the previous meeting |
| 14:31 |
|
ashimema |
#topic RFC /suggestions endpoint |
| 14:31 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now RFC /suggestions endpoint (Meeting topic: Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020) |
| 14:32 |
|
ashimema |
er.. |
| 14:32 |
|
ashimema |
whats the difference between suggestion_date and date_created? |
| 14:35 |
|
ashimema |
all very quiet |
| 14:35 |
|
marcelr |
suggestion_date is rather vague |
| 14:35 |
|
marcelr |
especially if it gets updated or so |
| 14:35 |
|
kohaputti |
date contains timestamp |
| 14:36 |
|
kohaputti |
it is the last time the suggestion row was updated |
| 14:36 |
|
Joubu |
3041 `date` timestamp NOT NULL default CURRENT_TIMESTAMP on update CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, -- date and time the suggestion was updated |
| 14:36 |
|
kohaputti |
so date_created is a really bad name |
| 14:36 |
|
Joubu |
3028 `suggesteddate` date NOT NULL, -- date the suggestion was submitted |
| 14:36 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 14:36 |
|
kohaputti |
date_updated would be better |
| 14:36 |
|
ashimema |
so it's not 'date_created' at all |
| 14:36 |
|
Joubu |
date => updated_on |
| 14:37 |
|
ashimema |
agreed |
| 14:37 |
|
thd |
date_created as opposed to creation_date is inconsistent with other dates as something_date . We should either have date_something or something_date if it is easy enough to be consistent. |
| 14:38 |
|
kohaputti |
Joubu, updated_on is used elsewhere? |
| 14:38 |
|
kohaputti |
just checked |
| 14:38 |
|
kohaputti |
it is used on other endpoints, so let's use updated_on here also |
| 14:38 |
|
marcelr |
created_on and updated_on are used |
| 14:39 |
|
Joubu |
it was not a suggestion, just saying what it does |
| 14:39 |
|
ashimema |
we discussed the date vs date last meeting.. I think we came to the conclusion we should try to be consistently *_date |
| 14:39 |
|
Joubu |
in the rest api we use *_date |
| 14:39 |
|
|
did joined #koha |
| 14:39 |
|
cait |
sorry had to step out for a sec |
| 14:39 |
|
thd |
Yes. |
| 14:39 |
|
marcelr |
updated_date is not so nice btw |
| 14:40 |
|
cait |
ashimema: not against people checking - but I tried my best to fill blanks |
| 14:40 |
|
kohaputti |
we have the patrons endpoint using updated_on |
| 14:40 |
|
thd |
update_date may be nicer for that case. |
| 14:40 |
|
Joubu |
it should be 'timestamp' I think |
| 14:40 |
|
kohaputti |
Joubu, timestamp of what |
| 14:40 |
|
kohaputti |
Joubu, not clear for me |
| 14:40 |
|
cait |
for suggestions (sorry, slow reading back) |
| 14:40 |
|
ashimema |
we have `updated_by` and `updated_on` in a few places elsewhere in the API.. so that seems sane enough to me |
| 14:40 |
|
Joubu |
item already has "timestamp" |
| 14:41 |
|
cait |
but it's not hte same is it? |
| 14:41 |
|
cait |
date created and updated? |
| 14:42 |
|
kohaputti |
cait, it is not the same |
| 14:42 |
|
ashimema |
ack.. we do indeed also have 'timestamp' in a bunch of places |
| 14:42 |
|
Joubu |
883 `timestamp` timestamp NOT NULL default CURRENT_TIMESTAMP on update CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, -- date and time this item was last altered |
| 14:42 |
|
Joubu |
it's exactly the same |
| 14:42 |
|
thd |
The fact that it has been previously done in some way does not mean that we should be stuck with what we did previously. We may want to revisit previous usage for consistency on a reasonable principle. |
| 14:42 |
|
ashimema |
I don't like 'timestamp' on it's own as it's not clear whether it's an initial create or an update that's being recorded |
| 14:43 |
|
cait |
if it#s both |
| 14:43 |
|
cait |
timestamp seems not so bad |
| 14:43 |
|
marcelr |
does _date also mean datetime ? |
| 14:43 |
|
cait |
we have places where update/create are 2 things |
| 14:43 |
|
marcelr |
or do we differentiate that? |
| 14:44 |
|
cait |
good question |
| 14:44 |
|
cait |
i think we have not been cehcking all the others so far |
| 14:44 |
|
* ashimema |
thinks we should really always store timestamp and then reduce to date only if/when we want to.. |
| 14:45 |
|
ashimema |
we really need to add some guidlines for these rather than voting on them per endpoint |
| 14:45 |
|
cait |
there was some discussion ont hat last time |
| 14:46 |
|
cait |
date_ vs. _date |
| 14:46 |
|
marcelr |
or trust one dedicated and consitent person to do that for us ;) |
| 14:46 |
|
marcelr |
consistent |
| 14:46 |
|
cait |
and also using _id - when we actually store an id |
| 14:46 |
|
ashimema |
and we sebtled on *_date I believe.. but didn't record it |
| 14:46 |
|
Joubu |
I think we should have the whole thing/view and vote in one go |
| 14:47 |
|
cait |
i think the only place where we need a decision is date date_created creaton_date updated_on |
| 14:47 |
|
cait |
then we coudl say the last column counts |
| 14:47 |
|
thd |
Even if we have only a date and not a time for some source a hypothetical time might be attached as 12.00.00 . |
| 14:47 |
|
cait |
thd: i don't think we do or should do that |
| 14:47 |
|
marcelr |
i think we should store datetimes |
| 14:48 |
|
cait |
+1 |
| 14:48 |
|
marcelr |
and show date in presentation perhaps |
| 14:48 |
|
cait |
reducing is easy, but we shoudl stay 'true' |
| 14:48 |
|
ashimema |
yup |
| 14:48 |
|
ashimema |
that's what I suggested |
| 14:49 |
|
cait |
but back to this one |
| 14:49 |
|
cait |
we have verified that it's not creation only |
| 14:49 |
|
cait |
so the first 2 are out |
| 14:49 |
|
cait |
and we have established that we like using _date if it's a date.. but it's a datetime |
| 14:49 |
|
thd |
If we do not always have dates as date times then we should distinguish between them. |
| 14:50 |
|
marcelr |
what about created_date and modified_date ? |
| 14:50 |
|
marcelr |
to prevent updated_date |
| 14:50 |
|
cait |
heh |
| 14:50 |
|
cait |
what did we do on items? |
| 14:51 |
|
ashimema |
`ed` on `ion` |
| 14:51 |
|
cait |
hm items has timestamp |
| 14:51 |
|
ashimema |
creation_date, modification_date |
| 14:51 |
|
marcelr |
sounds nicer |
| 14:51 |
|
cait |
looks like bilbio doesn't have anything |
| 14:51 |
|
marcelr |
no it should |
| 14:52 |
|
cait |
holds has timestamp too |
| 14:52 |
|
cait |
i think stay consistent for now |
| 14:52 |
|
cait |
timestamp |
| 14:52 |
|
marcelr |
biblio has a timestamp yes |
| 14:52 |
|
ashimema |
there are updated_on littered around too cait |
| 14:52 |
|
ashimema |
there is no 'stay consistent' yet because we are inconsistent |
| 14:53 |
|
ashimema |
hense me feeling we need to write a guideline properly first.. |
| 14:53 |
|
cait |
yes |
| 14:53 |
|
cait |
but sometimes that's just updated_on |
| 14:53 |
|
ashimema |
then work on making them all consisntent |
| 14:53 |
|
cait |
like borrowers |
| 14:53 |
|
cait |
they have both |
| 14:53 |
|
thd |
ashimema++ #guidelines |
| 14:54 |
|
cait |
my feeling is we shoudl not hold this up forever for one small decision |
| 14:54 |
|
cait |
we can still fix that |
| 14:54 |
|
cait |
have tomas continue... and then go in and fix according to guidelines at hackfest |
| 14:54 |
|
|
fridolin joined #koha |
| 14:54 |
|
marcelr |
guidelines first, fixes later on |
| 14:54 |
|
marcelr |
tomas can proceed |
| 14:54 |
|
cait |
1.5+ months is a lot in a cycle |
| 14:54 |
|
cait |
and those have been held up already |
| 14:55 |
|
ashimema |
right.. I think so we don't run out of time we should schedule a guideline for next meeting and not vote this week |
| 14:55 |
|
kohaputti |
cait, but we cannot fix this without breaking backwards compatibility? |
| 14:55 |
|
cait |
changing timestamp to something else in oen cylce is not hard |
| 14:55 |
|
thd |
Certainly we do not come to understand what guidelines should be without struggling with the questions in a real world context. |
| 14:55 |
|
cait |
i am saying fix according to guielines within this cycle |
| 14:55 |
|
cait |
and maybe not backport before we have done that |
| 14:55 |
|
ashimema |
well likewise.. but I don't feel it is being held up.. code is being written and we have time still in the cycle to correct the terms as per a guidline once the guidline it done |
| 14:55 |
|
cait |
exactly |
| 14:55 |
|
tcohen |
code is being written, that's correct |
| 14:56 |
|
tcohen |
the sooner we sort things the better, but we passed the mappings on the development, we will remap if required |
| 14:56 |
|
cait |
i am not sure if discussiong things biweekly here is so helpful too - because people don't do homework on this |
| 14:57 |
|
cait |
the rfc are open for commenting |
| 14:57 |
|
ashimema |
indeed |
| 14:57 |
|
cait |
we have had no additional comments added in the last 2 weeks |
| 14:57 |
|
tcohen |
maybe |
| 14:57 |
|
cait |
i feel it's unfiar to hold things up now |
| 14:57 |
|
ashimema |
lets move on |
| 14:57 |
|
tcohen |
we could have things moving on, and have a period of time in which people can counter propose |
| 14:57 |
|
tcohen |
during the cycle |
| 14:58 |
|
cait |
vote to vote? |
| 14:59 |
|
marcelr |
communicate important decisions or guidelines on the dev list ? |
| 14:59 |
|
Joubu |
wording will not block development anyway, it's a matter of 5min to adjust the patches to a new word |
| 14:59 |
|
cait |
Joubu: yeah, but stuff doesn't get pushed before vote |
| 14:59 |
|
ashimema |
indeed, that's my point |
| 14:59 |
|
marcelr |
Joubu we can rename 12 times an hour |
| 14:59 |
|
Joubu |
stuff is not developped :) |
| 15:00 |
|
Joubu |
marcelr: I am sure we can do more, it's 5 for the first one, but then we will automate that |
| 15:00 |
|
thd |
I do not see much lack of homework but it may be difficult to elicit proper engaged interactive discussion of nomenclature in this context outside of something as real time as an IRC meeting. |
| 15:01 |
|
marcelr |
i agree that doing this on a meeting is not very productive |
| 15:01 |
|
tcohen |
lets skip this, and we will think of a better workflow for this guidelines |
| 15:02 |
|
* oleonard |
leaves for another meeting, test 22880! |
| 15:02 |
|
tcohen |
I will think about it |
| 15:02 |
|
tcohen |
development is not held by this, the only problem is if things didn't get pushed/integrated because of this |
| 15:02 |
|
|
davidnind joined #koha |
| 15:02 |
|
tcohen |
but such is not the case |
| 15:03 |
|
tcohen |
so, lets move on and I will propose something in the lines of what marcelr said about announcing things on the lise |
| 15:03 |
|
tcohen |
list |
| 15:03 |
|
ashimema |
#info votes are not holding up development and as such will be postponed untill we have written clear guidlines for the contentious field names (date vs date and timestamp vs date consistency) |
| 15:03 |
|
Joubu |
we also need to be consistent, that's certainly the most important bit |
| 15:03 |
|
ashimema |
#topic Moving on with Bug 22407 |
| 15:03 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now Moving on with Bug 22407 (Meeting topic: Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020) |
| 15:03 |
|
huginn |
Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org[…]_bug.cgi?id=22407 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, koha-bugs, NEW , OMNIBUS: Use DBIC relations to fetch related object rather than searching for the object |
| 15:04 |
|
|
andreashm joined #koha |
| 15:04 |
|
ashimema |
was this tcohen or Joubu that raised it? |
| 15:04 |
|
Joubu |
was not you? |
| 15:04 |
|
tcohen |
it was all of us |
| 15:04 |
|
marcelr |
my agenda didnt contain this point too? |
| 15:04 |
|
Joubu |
marcelr: refresh |
| 15:04 |
|
marcelr |
i would suggest to copy stuff from the previous meeting directly after that one |
| 15:05 |
|
marcelr |
and not just before starting |
| 15:06 |
|
Joubu |
ashimema: is there a "replace them all" plan, or it only applies for the new ones? |
| 15:06 |
|
Joubu |
ie. are all the related an exhaustive list? |
| 15:06 |
|
ashimema |
I think that's the question.. I feel like we should plan to replace them all |
| 15:06 |
|
marcelr |
i would agree with the principle but it might be a major refactor ? |
| 15:07 |
|
Joubu |
it's not |
| 15:07 |
|
marcelr |
ok |
| 15:07 |
|
Joubu |
should be quite easy |
| 15:07 |
|
marcelr |
even better |
| 15:07 |
|
marcelr |
at least dont allow new ones to come up again |
| 15:07 |
|
marcelr |
qa tools? |
| 15:08 |
|
Joubu |
I do not think it will be possible to write such rule |
| 15:08 |
|
marcelr |
hoped you could |
| 15:08 |
|
ashimema |
indeed.. I tried to work out if it was possible but failed |
| 15:09 |
|
marcelr |
yeah it does not sound easy |
| 15:09 |
|
Joubu |
but easy to eyeball :) |
| 15:09 |
|
ashimema |
OK, I'm happy to work with someone on a bug to catch outstanding cases.. |
| 15:09 |
|
ashimema |
I do tend to catch them in new code as QA or Push time |
| 15:09 |
|
Joubu |
I will too |
| 15:09 |
|
marcelr |
add a guideline too |
| 15:10 |
|
ashimema |
the guideline already exists I believe |
| 15:10 |
|
ashimema |
PERL15 |
| 15:11 |
|
marcelr |
it is a bit hidden in the examples |
| 15:11 |
|
ashimema |
feel free to reword it.. I think we voted on it months ago and didn't come up with better |
| 15:12 |
|
Joubu |
moving on then? |
| 15:12 |
|
ashimema |
yeah. |
| 15:12 |
|
marcelr |
ok i will spend 5 mins on rewording ;) |
| 15:13 |
|
ashimema |
#info We will clarify the wording of PERL15 (perhaps even splitting it out into it's own guidline) for Koha::Object relationships |
| 15:13 |
|
ashimema |
#topic Review of coding guidelines |
| 15:13 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now Review of coding guidelines (Meeting topic: Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020) |
| 15:13 |
|
ashimema |
#topic PERL27: Return values consistency. If a method returns a list, and there are no items, it should return [] (empty list). If it is a scalar, undef. |
| 15:13 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now PERL27: Return values consistency. If a method returns a list, and there are no items, it should return [] (empty list). If it is a scalar, undef. (Meeting topic: Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020) |
| 15:14 |
|
marcelr |
do we mean to write return undef; ? |
| 15:14 |
|
marcelr |
this is not recommended |
| 15:14 |
|
ashimema |
remind me where this came from |
| 15:15 |
|
marcelr |
ProhibitExplicitReturnUndef in best practices |
| 15:15 |
|
marcelr |
and obivously [] is not empty list but () |
| 15:15 |
|
marcelr |
but a return; in list context does the same ? |
| 15:16 |
|
* ashimema |
reaches for the book |
| 15:16 |
|
Joubu |
where does come from PERL27? what was the context? |
| 15:16 |
|
marcelr |
who submitted it? |
| 15:16 |
|
ashimema |
indeed.. that's what I want to know |
| 15:16 |
|
ashimema |
where's the context.. |
| 15:16 |
|
ashimema |
in my opinion it should reply in caller context |
| 15:16 |
|
marcelr |
as a reference https://perlmaven.com/how-to-r[…]f-from-a-function |
| 15:17 |
|
|
xoan joined #koha |
| 15:17 |
|
tcohen |
PERL27 |
| 15:17 |
|
tcohen |
I think it was me |
| 15:17 |
|
marcelr |
lol |
| 15:17 |
|
marcelr |
never do that again tcohen ;) |
| 15:18 |
|
|
paul_p joined #koha |
| 15:18 |
|
tcohen |
the problem is I'm not on the meeting |
| 15:18 |
|
tcohen |
haha |
| 15:18 |
|
tcohen |
we are building a framework for simplifying retireval of data for rendering on the API |
| 15:19 |
|
tcohen |
and we need conventions so we can nicely prefetch related stuffs, and there will be a need for consistency on function call results |
| 15:19 |
|
tcohen |
that one, was a trivial one, so we don't need to check for defined on the result, and just pass the result to the rendering party |
| 15:20 |
|
tcohen |
the OpenAPI plugin will reject things that are supposed to be lists and are undef instead |
| 15:20 |
|
tcohen |
so, to avoid manual handling I proposed a guideline |
| 15:21 |
|
Joubu |
for the next meeting, could you provide existing examples, good and wrong? |
| 15:21 |
|
marcelr |
so it needs a bit more context |
| 15:21 |
|
ashimema |
+1 |
| 15:21 |
|
tcohen |
to be honest, I planned to explain it on the previoius meeting |
| 15:22 |
|
tcohen |
and didn't notice there was a meeting today |
| 15:22 |
|
tcohen |
sorry for that |
| 15:22 |
|
* Joubu |
vote yes for rule MEETING01 "Provide a new item with context and example, as well as a full guideline" :D |
| 15:22 |
|
tcohen |
+1 |
| 15:22 |
|
marcelr |
+1 |
| 15:22 |
|
tcohen |
dont_do_things_too_fast++ |
| 15:23 |
|
ashimema |
haha |
| 15:23 |
|
ashimema |
shall we move on again then |
| 15:23 |
|
|
paul_p_ joined #koha |
| 15:23 |
|
ashimema |
#topic Reinforce good commit messages guideline |
| 15:23 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now Reinforce good commit messages guideline (Meeting topic: Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020) |
| 15:23 |
|
Joubu |
that was me |
| 15:23 |
|
ashimema |
#link https://wiki.koha-community.or[…]messages#Examples Guidline |
| 15:23 |
|
marcelr |
note the diff between bug and enhancement here |
| 15:23 |
|
ashimema |
it was indeed |
| 15:24 |
|
Joubu |
I tried to enforce this rule when I was RM. And we voted the guideline. The rule is no longer enforced |
| 15:24 |
|
Joubu |
I'd like to know if we should get back to that or not |
| 15:24 |
|
tcohen |
You don't always follow it :-P |
| 15:24 |
|
Joubu |
like: do not c/p the bug title in the commit message, that's 2 different things |
| 15:24 |
|
tcohen |
yeah, I hate that |
| 15:24 |
|
Joubu |
I had to raise it because kohaputti FQA one of my patches for that reason :) |
| 15:25 |
|
marcelr |
ah |
| 15:25 |
|
marcelr |
selective reinforcement |
| 15:25 |
|
Joubu |
it should be done at QA level and RM, not necessarily FQA |
| 15:26 |
|
ashimema |
agreed I think |
| 15:26 |
|
kohaputti |
I vote to definitely enforce it |
| 15:26 |
|
ashimema |
I do sometimes clean up commit messages on push.. though I'm inconsistent |
| 15:26 |
|
marcelr |
it is always hard to fail a patch for title only |
| 15:26 |
|
thd |
Have we recently passing patches which match examples of the worst commit messages? |
| 15:26 |
|
Joubu |
and FQA if author stick to their bad habbits ;) |
| 15:26 |
|
Joubu |
yes, a lot |
| 15:26 |
|
tcohen |
I agree with Joubu |
| 15:26 |
|
ashimema |
me too |
| 15:26 |
|
kohaputti |
It is just one time to fail the patch, the author should learn for the next times |
| 15:26 |
|
Joubu |
so email to koha-devel ? |
| 15:27 |
|
marcelr |
exception for new authors perhaps |
| 15:27 |
|
tcohen |
use social skills and don't be too hard on people, unless they keep their wrong habbit |
| 15:27 |
|
thd |
Joubu++ |
| 15:27 |
|
marcelr |
new authors are allowed to do a lot |
| 15:27 |
|
tcohen |
when I was RM, I fixed them on push too |
| 15:27 |
|
Joubu |
but only the first time ;) |
| 15:27 |
|
marcelr |
right |
| 15:28 |
|
ashimema |
having a quick scan of the commitlog we're not straying too far from it all that often |
| 15:28 |
|
kohaputti |
as a qa person I have no idea how many times this person has made non-descriptive patches, so quick fail or no fail is better in my opinion |
| 15:28 |
|
ashimema |
so, enforcement at QA level isn't terrible.. but equally use a bit of judgement and generally opt on the side of 'be nice'.. |
| 15:28 |
|
marcelr |
so actually there is no problem? |
| 15:28 |
|
Joubu |
#action Joubu will send an email to the list to remind devs about good/bad commit messages |
| 15:29 |
|
ashimema |
I would never FQA a bug on just the title without having looked at the rest of the code first.. I would usually fix it for them and bring it up as a point that they should learn from my change |
| 15:29 |
|
marcelr |
you always change my titles lol |
| 15:29 |
|
ashimema |
a reminder is good now and then.. so that would be great Joubu |
| 15:30 |
|
thd |
Without checking I presumed that the issue was more about excessive reference to bug report discussion in commit comments where irrespective of the simplicity of making a simple in comment description. |
| 15:30 |
|
kohaputti |
for me the issue with non-descriptive commits is I have to use more time to understand the patch |
| 15:30 |
|
kohaputti |
I don't want to reverse engineer the patch |
| 15:31 |
|
marcelr |
that is also about more comment in the code |
| 15:32 |
|
* ashimema |
is really struggling to find a bad one going through master |
| 15:32 |
|
marcelr |
but leaving scope here |
| 15:32 |
|
Joubu |
"Column Configuration for pay-fines-table does not hide Account Type properly" |
| 15:32 |
|
Joubu |
it's the bug, not what does the patch |
| 15:33 |
|
Joubu |
the following sequence of patch does not tell what the patchset does: |
| 15:33 |
|
Joubu |
24478: Add `EnablePointOfSale` system preference |
| 15:33 |
|
Joubu |
24478: Use `EnablePointOfSale` preference |
| 15:33 |
|
Joubu |
24478: Fix sequence in sysprefs.sql and add missing comma |
| 15:34 |
|
ashimema |
to me.. the really bad ones are 'Address comment #42' and 'follow-up' |
| 15:35 |
|
marcelr |
{QA follow-up) Some changes |
| 15:36 |
|
Joubu |
I think we are done :) |
| 15:36 |
|
marcelr |
yeah |
| 15:36 |
|
ashimema |
I'm confused.. are you highlighting 24478 as bad or good.. |
| 15:36 |
|
Joubu |
bad |
| 15:36 |
|
kohaputti |
for me those 24478 ones are really clear |
| 15:36 |
|
marcelr |
Fix sequence in sysprefs.sql and add missing comma is not that bad |
| 15:36 |
|
ashimema |
how would you have worded them? |
| 15:36 |
|
marcelr |
it describe what you do |
| 15:36 |
|
Joubu |
The main patch is "Use `EnablePointOfSale` preference" |
| 15:36 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 15:37 |
|
kohaputti |
Joubu, read the body if you wanna know more details why it is used |
| 15:37 |
|
Joubu |
Add a global switch to turn POS off |
| 15:37 |
|
kohaputti |
body is for more explanation |
| 15:37 |
|
ashimema |
what.. for all three patches you would use that single title? |
| 15:37 |
|
ashimema |
or you would submit it as one bigger patch |
| 15:37 |
|
marcelr |
Introduce pref X to allow enabling or disabling |
| 15:38 |
|
marcelr |
Use pref X is a bit cryptic |
| 15:38 |
|
* ashimema |
is looking at this as constructive criticism.. I like :) |
| 15:38 |
|
|
paul_p__ joined #koha |
| 15:38 |
|
ashimema |
fair |
| 15:39 |
|
ashimema |
I tend to break down bugs into small commits to ease rebasing and backporting personally.. |
| 15:39 |
|
marcelr |
which is great |
| 15:39 |
|
marcelr |
it is just about the title |
| 15:39 |
|
Joubu |
I do not understand that one: "Dobbie is a free elf" |
| 15:39 |
|
Joubu |
what did you mean? |
| 15:39 |
|
Joubu |
;) |
| 15:39 |
|
Joubu |
next meeting? |
| 15:39 |
|
wahanui |
next meeting is https://wiki.koha-community.or[…]Next_IRC_meetings |
| 15:39 |
|
kohaputti |
ashimema, here it would have been better to make use of the syspref in the same patch it is introduced |
| 15:39 |
|
marcelr |
your latest patch, Joubu ? |
| 15:39 |
|
ashimema |
ok.. I think we can probably move on. |
| 15:39 |
|
ashimema |
lol |
| 15:39 |
|
ashimema |
'Guess the RM' |
| 15:39 |
|
marcelr |
ashimema++ |
| 15:40 |
|
ashimema |
#topic Set time of next meeting |
| 15:40 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now Set time of next meeting (Meeting topic: Development IRC meeting 29 January 2020) |
| 15:40 |
|
ashimema |
same schedule as ever.. |
| 15:40 |
|
Joubu |
kohaputti: no, 1 patch for the new pref is good |
| 15:40 |
|
ashimema |
so, 5th |
| 15:40 |
|
Joubu |
you can spot omission easily |
| 15:41 |
|
kohaputti |
Joubu, not for reading a story or reverting feature |
| 15:41 |
|
Joubu |
it does not happen often |
| 15:41 |
|
kohaputti |
Joubu, what omission you are talking about? |
| 15:41 |
|
ashimema |
what time shall we make it.. |
| 15:41 |
|
Joubu |
add a pref is: atomicupdate, sysprefs.sql, pref.inc |
| 15:41 |
|
kohaputti |
anything fine for me |
| 15:42 |
|
thd |
That is one week? |
| 15:42 |
|
ashimema |
2pm or 8pm UTC is the usual switch |
| 15:42 |
|
marcelr |
no it should be two weeks |
| 15:42 |
|
|
oleonard joined #koha |
| 15:42 |
|
ashimema |
oops |
| 15:42 |
|
ashimema |
you're right.. i read the wrong line |
| 15:42 |
|
marcelr |
it always toggles, good for NZ bad for Europe |
| 15:42 |
|
ashimema |
12th.. but that's also a general meeting on the 12th |
| 15:43 |
|
marcelr |
the general should be on the 5th ? |
| 15:43 |
|
ashimema |
8pm on the 12th is the general meeting.. |
| 15:43 |
|
Joubu |
1 or 3 weeks then |
| 15:43 |
|
ashimema |
how about 11th 8pm |
| 15:44 |
|
thd |
We have been on a second week of month or so pattern for general meetings recently. |
| 15:44 |
|
ashimema |
so same time as general meeting, but a day early |
| 15:44 |
|
ashimema |
or.. |
| 15:44 |
|
Joubu |
we need to resync, otherwise you will have the same problem next month |
| 15:45 |
|
marcelr |
do we want 1 or 2 dev meetings a month ? |
| 15:45 |
|
Joubu |
every 2 weeks |
| 15:45 |
|
marcelr |
ok 2 |
| 15:45 |
|
marcelr |
second tuesday fourth wednesday ? |
| 15:46 |
|
Joubu |
I would pick Wed 19th |
| 15:46 |
|
ashimema |
I'm thinking 5th.. to keep the ball rolling on getting those API guidelines done and bringing us back to the off week for general meeting. |
| 15:46 |
|
ashimema |
it can be a nice short one with just a vote on that guidline I'll draft this afternoon |
| 15:46 |
|
Joubu |
or 5 yes |
| 15:46 |
|
marcelr |
5th and 19th and sticking to first and third |
| 15:47 |
|
ashimema |
also.. 5th gives us another week to remind GBSD on 14th :) |
| 15:47 |
|
marcelr |
twice a month means every 2 or 3 weeks |
| 15:47 |
|
thd |
Yes, months are not evenly divided by weeks. |
| 15:47 |
|
Joubu |
that's why I answered you 1 every 2 weeks |
| 15:48 |
|
marcelr |
Joubu that could be confusing too |
| 15:48 |
|
Joubu |
endmeeeeeting |
| 15:48 |
|
marcelr |
heh |
| 15:48 |
|
ashimema |
#info Next meeting: 5 February 2020, 20 UTC |
| 15:48 |
|
ashimema |
#endmeeting |
| 15:48 |
|
|
Topic for #koha is now Welcome to #koha this channel is for discussion of the Koha project and software http://koha-community.org |
| 15:48 |
|
huginn |
Meeting ended Wed Jan 29 15:48:41 2020 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) |
| 15:48 |
|
huginn |
Minutes: http://meetings.koha-community[…]-01-29-14.00.html |
| 15:48 |
|
huginn |
Minutes (text): http://meetings.koha-community[…]0-01-29-14.00.txt |
| 15:48 |
|
huginn |
Log: http://meetings.koha-community[…]29-14.00.log.html |
| 15:48 |
|
Joubu |
marcelr: that's what we are doing for years now :) |
| 15:48 |
|
ashimema |
thanks guys.. apologies that was another long one. |
| 15:49 |
|
marcelr |
no need to keep doing that :) |
| 15:49 |
|
Joubu |
I think we should discuss tab vs spaces |
| 15:49 |
|
marcelr |
i like that one do it on 20UTC please |
| 15:49 |
|
Joubu |
not sure spaces was the correct choice |
| 15:49 |
|
thd |
Joubu :) |
| 15:49 |
|
marcelr |
take your time |
| 15:49 |
|
marcelr |
maybe some Unicode space alternative? |
| 15:49 |
|
ashimema |
did that come from my tweet about spaces vs tabs the other day Joubu? |
| 15:50 |
|
Joubu |
ashimema: nope! |
| 15:50 |
|
ashimema |
I was always a spaces man untill I read the accessability arguament |
| 15:50 |
|
Joubu |
what was it about? apart of tabs and space... |
| 15:50 |
|
marcelr |
U+205FMEDIUM MATHEMATICAL SPACE |
| 15:50 |
|
|
xoan joined #koha |
| 15:50 |
|
Joubu |
ashimema: so you have the coding guideline almost written I bet! |
| 15:51 |
|
ashimema |
https://www.reddit.com/r/javas[…]10523928949887991 |
| 15:51 |
|
marcelr |
and it will be enforced |
| 15:52 |
|
marcelr |
bye #koha |
| 15:53 |
|
ashimema |
I tweeted it on Jan 5th |
| 15:55 |
|
oleonard-away |
ashimema: I'm ready to switch only if we can convert all spaces to tabs in one giant update! |
| 15:56 |
|
kohaputti |
oleonard, probably good to do perltidy at the same time |
| 15:56 |
|
oleonard |
ashimema: I found that argument to be very compelling |
| 16:04 |
|
|
Marie-Luce joined #koha |
| 16:07 |
|
|
fridolin left #koha |
| 16:08 |
|
ashimema |
indeed |
| 16:09 |
|
ashimema |
me too.. but it would be a nightmare commit to do such a bulk change :( |
| 16:13 |
|
reiveune |
bye |
| 16:13 |
|
|
reiveune left #koha |
| 16:13 |
|
oleonard |
ashimema: I would have assumed it would be a nightmare commit, but I don't actually know why it would be. |
| 16:13 |
|
huginn |
News from kohagit: Revert "Bug 23493: (follow-up) Switch to aDataSort for multi-column sorting" <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]967fbe6d6bdb573a7> |
| 16:13 |
|
Joubu |
just saying but having a script that replace 4 spaces with tab when open a file, then reverse that on write, does not seem complicated. I am certainly missing something. |
| 16:13 |
|
huginn |
News from kohagit: Revert "Bug 23493: (follow-up) Disable rowGroup on due date sort" <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]109fb6212df6e11a0> |
| 16:13 |
|
huginn |
News from kohagit: Bug 23493: Remove commented lines <http://git.koha-community.org/[…]e2968754ad655c9cf> |
| 16:15 |
|
ashimema |
lol |
| 16:21 |
|
* oleonard |
doesn't know who ashimema is lol'ing at and is afraid to ask |
| 16:26 |
|
|
andreashm joined #koha |
| 16:28 |
|
vfernandes |
any opinion about this: the link "Limit to currently available items" limits the search to the items where onloan is false... shouldn't list the items where onloan and notforloan are false? |
| 16:30 |
|
ashimema |
erm |
| 16:30 |
|
ashimema |
is bugzilla crazy slow for anyone else |
| 16:33 |
|
oleonard |
Seems okay to me ashimema |
| 16:33 |
|
cait |
available doesn't mean available for checkout |
| 16:33 |
|
ashimema |
it's come back now.. very odd |
| 16:33 |
|
cait |
vfernandes: it just means 'on the shelf' |
| 16:34 |
|
cait |
in academic librareis you might find things in a reading room |
| 16:34 |
|
cait |
or in a reference area maybe |
| 16:37 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 16:40 |
|
|
Scott-CSPL joined #koha |
| 16:42 |
|
vfernandes |
cait: i know but the term "available" can confuse the libraries (available on the shelf or available for checkout)? |
| 16:43 |
|
vfernandes |
maybe the string needs to be changed |
| 16:48 |
|
cait |
vfernandes: we can't really determine available for checkout |
| 16:48 |
|
cait |
because of circulation rules |
| 16:48 |
|
cait |
it#s not in marc |
| 16:52 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9 build #1112: STILL UNSTABLE in 38 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_D9/1112/ |
| 16:53 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D8 build #650: STILL UNSTABLE in 35 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]ha_Master_D8/650/ |
| 17:02 |
|
|
oleonard-away joined #koha |
| 17:08 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_U18 build #583: NOW UNSTABLE in 53 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]a_Master_U18/583/ |
| 17:13 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9_My8 build #121: STILL UNSTABLE in 55 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]aster_D9_My8/121/ |
| 17:17 |
|
|
inlibro_ joined #koha |
| 17:20 |
|
|
khall_ joined #koha |
| 17:25 |
|
|
magnuse joined #koha |
| 17:25 |
|
|
Nemo_bis joined #koha |
| 17:25 |
|
|
Joubu joined #koha |
| 17:25 |
|
|
janPasi joined #koha |
| 17:25 |
|
|
zb joined #koha |
| 17:25 |
|
|
matts joined #koha |
| 17:25 |
|
|
tuxayo[m] joined #koha |
| 17:25 |
|
|
ashimema joined #koha |
| 17:25 |
|
|
tuxayo[m]1 joined #koha |
| 17:30 |
|
koha-jenkins |
Project Koha_Master_D9_MDB_Latest build #100: STILL UNSTABLE in 38 min: https://jenkins.koha-community[…]9_MDB_Latest/100/ |
| 17:37 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 17:38 |
|
|
andreashm joined #koha |
| 17:40 |
|
tcohen |
!start |
| 17:40 |
|
AnnaBoten |
The hunt starts now! |
| 17:43 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_o< quack! |
| 17:43 |
|
wahanui |
!bang |
| 17:43 |
|
oleonard |
!bang |
| 17:43 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_x< oleonard: 1 (7.51 seconds) |
| 17:51 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_o< quack! |
| 17:51 |
|
wahanui |
oops, slipped over |
| 17:51 |
|
oleonard |
!bang |
| 17:51 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_x< oleonard: 2 (4.06 seconds) |
| 18:00 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_o< quack! |
| 18:00 |
|
wahanui |
!bang |
| 18:02 |
|
oleonard |
!bang |
| 18:02 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_x< oleonard: 3 (84.46 seconds) |
| 18:02 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\o/ oleonard: 3 ducks out of 3: perfect!!! +5 \o/ |
| 18:02 |
|
AnnaBoten |
Best time: oleonard with 4.06 seconds |
| 18:02 |
|
AnnaBoten |
oleonard took the lead for the week over corilynn with 8 points. |
| 18:07 |
|
|
JesseM joined #koha |
| 18:11 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_o< quack! |
| 18:11 |
|
wahanui |
*click* |
| 18:11 |
|
oleonard |
!bang |
| 18:11 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_x< oleonard: 1 (9.07 seconds) |
| 18:14 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_o< quack! |
| 18:14 |
|
wahanui |
oops, slipped over |
| 18:14 |
|
oleonard |
!bang |
| 18:14 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_x< oleonard: 2 (7.34 seconds) |
| 18:15 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_o< quack! |
| 18:15 |
|
wahanui |
*click* |
| 18:16 |
|
oleonard |
!bang |
| 18:16 |
|
AnnaBoten |
oleonard, you missed the duck! |
| 18:16 |
|
oleonard |
!bang |
| 18:16 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_x< oleonard: 3 (47.50 seconds) |
| 18:16 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\o/ oleonard: 3 ducks out of 3: perfect!!! +5 \o/ |
| 18:16 |
|
AnnaBoten |
Best time: oleonard with 7.34 seconds |
| 18:26 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_o< quack! |
| 18:26 |
|
wahanui |
*click* |
| 18:29 |
|
|
davidnind joined #koha |
| 18:33 |
|
|
davidnind left #koha |
| 18:37 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 18:44 |
|
tcohen |
!bang |
| 18:44 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_x< tcohen: 1 (1062.92 seconds) |
| 18:54 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_o< quack! |
| 18:54 |
|
wahanui |
*click* |
| 18:54 |
|
oleonard |
!bang |
| 18:54 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_x< oleonard: 1 (36.32 seconds) |
| 18:57 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_o< quack! |
| 18:57 |
|
wahanui |
*click* |
| 19:02 |
|
tcohen |
!bang |
| 19:02 |
|
AnnaBoten |
tcohen, you missed the duck! |
| 19:02 |
|
tcohen |
!bang |
| 19:02 |
|
AnnaBoten |
tcohen, you are reloading... (Reloading takes 5 seconds) |
| 19:02 |
|
tcohen |
!bang |
| 19:02 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_x< tcohen: 2 (300.41 seconds) |
| 19:02 |
|
oleonard |
!bang |
| 19:02 |
|
AnnaBoten |
[('tcohen', 2), ('oleonard', 1)] |
| 19:02 |
|
AnnaBoten |
Best time: oleonard with 36.32 seconds |
| 19:02 |
|
AnnaBoten |
There was no duck! oleonard: -1 (301.05 seconds) |
| 19:05 |
|
|
kathryn joined #koha |
| 19:09 |
|
|
cait joined #koha |
| 19:10 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_o< quack! |
| 19:10 |
|
wahanui |
!bang |
| 19:10 |
|
oleonard |
!bang |
| 19:10 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_x< oleonard: 0 (5.49 seconds) |
| 19:17 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_o< quack! |
| 19:17 |
|
wahanui |
*click* |
| 19:21 |
|
oleonard |
!bang |
| 19:21 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_x< oleonard: 1 (251.55 seconds) |
| 19:25 |
|
tcohen |
!bang |
| 19:25 |
|
AnnaBoten |
There was no duck! tcohen: -1 (469.76 seconds) |
| 19:25 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_o< quack! |
| 19:25 |
|
wahanui |
!bang |
| 19:28 |
|
oleonard |
!bang |
| 19:28 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_x< oleonard: 2 (149.98 seconds) |
| 19:28 |
|
AnnaBoten |
[('oleonard', 2), ('tcohen', -1)] |
| 19:28 |
|
AnnaBoten |
Best time: oleonard with 5.49 seconds |
| 19:34 |
|
AnnaBoten |
\_o< quack! |
| 19:34 |
|
wahanui |
!bang |
| 19:36 |
|
oleonard |
!bang |
| 19:36 |
|
AnnaBoten |
oleonard, you missed the duck! |
| 19:37 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 19:45 |
|
|
xoan joined #koha |
| 19:59 |
|
|
hayley joined #koha |
| 20:01 |
|
cait |
happy birthday aleisha :) |
| 20:01 |
|
aleisha |
thank you cait :) |
| 20:01 |
|
kathryn |
thank you for my happy birthday the other day cait, I missed you! :) |
| 20:02 |
|
cait |
all good, did you have a good day? |
| 20:02 |
|
kathryn |
yup! |
| 20:03 |
|
cait |
:) |
| 20:03 |
|
|
alexbuckley joined #koha |
| 20:14 |
|
|
rcmcdonald joined #koha |
| 20:16 |
|
rcmcdonald |
Hello! I've got a quick question for the Koha community. Is there a way to set default permissions to a patron category? I want to define LDAP security groups that contain my librarians that trickles down to patron categories, that in turn sets access permissions automatically |
| 20:26 |
|
cait |
sorry, not atm |
| 20:27 |
|
cait |
there are bugs reported to do user roles and such, but no active development as far as I know |
| 20:37 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 20:58 |
|
|
tosca joined #koha |
| 21:37 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 21:45 |
|
|
aleisha joined #koha |
| 22:29 |
|
|
xoan joined #koha |
| 22:36 |
|
|
khall joined #koha |
| 22:38 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
| 23:14 |
|
|
khall joined #koha |
| 23:37 |
|
|
alexbuckley joined #koha |
| 23:38 |
|
|
inlibro joined #koha |
