Time  Nick      Message
15:34 * cait    waves
20:19 cait      very quiet :)
20:40 bgkriegel Hi
20:41 cait      hi !
20:41 cait      :)
20:41 bgkriegel Hi cait :)
20:41 cait      bgkriegel++++  :)
20:42 cait      you are not here often, so i had to save up a bit
20:42 cait      @karma bgkriegel
20:42 huginn    cait: Karma for "bgkriegel" has been increased 3 times and decreased 0 times for a total karma of 3.
20:42 bgkriegel Hehe
20:43 cait      how are you doing?
20:43 bgkriegel cait, I sent a mail (to you) with a question, but got an automated response :)
20:43 cait      ah yeah, i am on vacation :)
20:43 bgkriegel Good, thanks
20:43 bgkriegel Well, here then
20:44 bgkriegel About Bug 11955
20:44 huginn    04Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11955 minor, P5 - low, ---, gmcharlt, Needs Signoff , Remove spaces in empty indicators after linking an authority to a biblio record.
20:44 cait      hm hope i can help
20:44 bgkriegel problem is, editor saves spaces in marcxml indicators if they are undefined or empty
20:45 bgkriegel question is if that is right
20:45 cait      [off]omg kittens!
20:45 cait      hm i really don't know
20:45 cait      maybe we could check the loc marcxml documentation?
20:45 bgkriegel that bug (and the duplicate) solves a problem introduced by the editor
20:45 cait      i haven't looked at the bug closer yet, sec
20:46 bgkriegel also can look at line 2433 of C4/Biblio.pm
20:47 jcamins   I believe spaces are mandatory.
20:48 jcamins   But you'd have to check the MARCXML documentation to know for sure.
20:48 bgkriegel hi jcamins, well in that case the proposed solution is right
20:49 jcamins   Yes, I just checked the schema.
20:49 jcamins   Empty indicators must have a space in them.
20:50 bgkriegel Ok then :)
22:36 indradg   hi i've a question about bug id 6815
22:36 indradg   http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6815
22:36 huginn    04Bug 6815: enhancement, P5 - low, ---, kohapatch, ASSIGNED , Capture member photo via webcam
22:37 indradg   i see that Owen has commented that due to Flash dep of jscam used in the old proposed patch it is not acceptable
22:38 indradg   my question : would a HTML5 getUserMedia based patch be acceptable?
22:50 cait      indradg: maybe it would be a good candidate for a plugin?
22:54 jcamins   cait: yeah, that would make sense as a plugin.