Time  Nick              Message
23:53 ricardo           http://stats.workbuffer.org/irclog/koha/today  is logging stuff even after munin went away
23:53 ricardo           chris_n: You're right  :)
23:51 chris_n2          is still here, so the logging should be working fine
23:50 ricardo           chris_n2: OK. Let's hope that chris returns then.
23:50 chris_n2          chris is munin's keeper I think
23:50 ricardo           Is it Galen?
23:49 ricardo           chris_n2: Went away... Who's taking care of it?
23:44 chris_n2          where's munin?
23:20 ricardo_away      PANIC! No Bot in the channel?
22:02 |Lupin|           bye everybody
22:02 |Lupin|           ok, we will see... enough code for today.
21:47 |Lupin|           can anyone remember whether a bug regarding overdue_notices has been reported recently, please ?
21:19 ricardo           Dinner time. BBL
21:16 ricardo           |Lupin|: http://search.cpan.org/~timb/DBI/DBI.pm#fetchrow_hashref
21:16 * |Lupin|         ran away from physics as quickly as possible, and now is doing experimental computer science... sad thing...
21:15 |Lupin|           ricardo: that being said, its's a bit awkward to rely on the behaviour be similar on the other systems...
21:15 ricardo           thanks
21:15 |Lupin|           ricardo: sure
21:14 ricardo           |Lupin|: OK, report back afterwards then, please  :)
21:13 * |Lupin|         thinks he is just going to experiment and see whether the name is qualified or not
21:13 |Lupin|           ricardo: yeah, true. NOt sure it would help, that being said
21:09 ricardo           select variable as var from systempreferences;
21:09 ricardo           |Lupin|: Not sure... But you may rename the column with "as". Example;
21:07 |Lupin|           when a column is qualified in an SQL request, say tbl.col, what's his name gonna be in the resluts fetched with fetch_rowhash ? col or tbl.col ? someone knows this, please ?
21:03 ricardo           hdl_laptop: Is there still time for some last-minute corrections for submitting the Portuguese translation for 3.0.4?
21:02 ricardo           Bye sekjal!  :)
21:02 sekjal            cheers, all
21:02 sekjal            looks like my Saturday shift is over.  Time to home.
20:58 sekjal            I wish I had more time in my work day to just do R&D on Koha; there are so many possibilities!
20:57 chris             excellent
20:56 sekjal            oh, good, and it looks like UNIMARC has similar structures for capturing this kinda thing: http://archive.ifla.org/VI/3/p1996-1/uni4.htm
20:54 sekjal            though perhaps something could be scripted, pulling from XISBN or ThingISBN or another such service
20:54 sekjal            It'd work great for FRBRization.  the hard part would be creating the links to begin with
20:54 chris             probably not so bad in a special library, but in a public with lots of fiction, really annoying for the borrowers
20:53 chris             *nod* the main use case is for when someone searches for one of the harry potter books, they dont get 3 pages of results, each result for each different 'format'
20:52 sekjal            a web of records
20:51 sekjal            or, if the relationship is less rigidly defined, not so much hierarchies as a thesaurus
20:51 sekjal            though too many layers might be confusing
20:50 sekjal            we could generate arbitrary hierarchies
20:50 chris             sweet
20:49 sekjal            I think it would work for what you want to do, too, chris, if it was designed generically enough
20:49 sekjal            the serial bib's detailed view could then show 'related items' or some such, and pull the items from the linked bibs
20:49 chris             to provide much nicer search results
20:49 chris             so you can decide as a library, to group all the manifestations together
20:48 sekjal            I thought it would make more sense to 'analyze' the items off the serial bib onto their monographic bib, with automatic creation of these MARC 770s
20:48 chris             i still want to be able to to let librarians choose to link MARC records together, with something like a meta record
20:48 sekjal            at least for MARC21, there is a way to point one bib to another (field 770 and thereabounds)
20:47 chris             ahhh
20:47 sekjal            our old system let us link an item to multiple bibs.  made my migration all kinds of complicated
20:47 sekjal            we have a number of serials whose issues can be cited as both serial issues, and monographs.  we have traditionally analyzed these titles, giving the items two bib records
20:46 chris             http://git.koha.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=Koha;a=shortlog;h=biblibre-acq-preview-only  <--- that one?
20:46 chris             hdl_laptop: which branch should i checkout if i want to test biblibre acquisitions?
20:46 chris             linking bibs together sekjal?
20:45 hdl_laptop        sekjal the best solution would be to handle items out of biblios
20:44 sekjal            and should wire in nicely with the bib linker I'm keen to design
20:44 chris             *nod*
20:43 munin             04Bug http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=2453 critical, P3, ---, gmcharlt@gmail.com, NEW, (very) large biblio/item handling
20:43 sekjal            will help with bug 2453
20:43 chris             yep thats a good biblibre one
20:43 sekjal            we've got 4 titles that can't be searched because they have too many items attached
20:42 sekjal            moving items between MARC records is going to help us a bunch
20:42 chris             its not all of them either, just the ones easy to find :)
20:40 sekjal            chris:  ooooh, nice list!  I wasn't aware of all of these enhancements...
20:39 ricardo           chris: On second thought, wait... I found it (although it's in English not in French... Not sure why I got in French. Maybe because I said that the indexing language was "fr" instead of "en". I'll test it now)
20:39 munin             hdl_laptop: The operation succeeded.
20:39 hdl_laptop        @later tell paul I have fixed the problem with the search on biblibre_head.git.biblibre.com
20:38 chris             ricardo: lemme check
20:38 munin             hdl_laptop: (later tell <nick> <text>) -- Tells <nick> <text> the next time <nick> is in seen. <nick> can contain wildcard characters, and the first matching nick will be given the note.
20:38 hdl_laptop        @later tell paul
20:38 ricardo           chris: I guess some lines in PO Portuguese staff file are missing (from the original English one). Is it easy for you to do some kind of "merge" that adds them?
20:38 hdl_laptop        hi chris
20:38 |Lupin|           chris: ok...
20:38 chris             http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/2009/10/18/changelog-for-koha-3-2-0/
20:38 chris             ok, i whacked up a quick one
20:34 chris             |Lupin|: because calculating the overdues puts some load on the server, sending emails doesnt, and sending emails during working hours means more chance people will read them
20:34 ricardo           Eheh
20:32 |Lupin|           perhaps it's better like that...
20:32 |Lupin|           too late
20:32 ricardo           |Lupin|: LOL!
20:32 |Lupin|           paul_p: hmm! now I remember why I don't want to have children ! :-)
20:30 paul_p            time to go to bed for me. Early wake up tomorrow (our last son, 2 1/2 wakes at 7AM, sunday included :'( )
20:30 ricardo           chris: Weird... I see this "Sélectionnez votre déclinaison MARC" in Step 3 of the Web installer, but it doesn't appear in "pt-PT-i-staff-t-prog-v-3000000.po" (although it does in "fr-FR-i-staff-t-prog-v-3000000.po")
20:29 sekjal            chris: gladly. hope I can be of some help...
20:29 |Lupin|           chris: I have to say I do'nt really see why one would want to run the overdue notice job at one time and then have the mails sent later...
20:29 chris             sekjal: thanks for replying to my email
20:28 chris             yes, you want them right away
20:28 |Lupin|           chris: k... but in the case of error notifications, I assume synchrone processing is fine ?
20:28 chris             but then send the emails at 9am
20:28 chris             |Lupin|: because you often want to run the overdues script at say 1am
20:27 * sekjal          feels frustration boiling up inside; thinks about kittens instead
20:27 |Lupin|           chris: Hmm not sure doing something re-usable is on top of my priority list for this one... basically, the idea is that our old system had a support Perl library that I integrated into Koha and I'm modifying it where necessary so that it calls Koha modules where apropriate.
20:27 chris             yeah, we cant change their page ... so we need one of our own
20:27 sekjal            so, wrongness abound
20:26 sekjal            LL also claims LEK is 'free/open source' and has 'no vendor lock-in' on their 'Solutions Comparison' page
20:26 chris             yep
20:26 |Lupin|           chris: k... btw I'm wondering why there are two send methods: one is snchrone, the other is asynchrone and enqueues messages in the db for later sending...
20:25 chris             because this sounds like something others would want also
20:25 chris             using the letters module would be the best bet
20:24 |Lupin|           (salut paul_p)
20:24 paul_p            mmm... I missed this one
20:24 |Lupin|           chris: our current system reports a few errors by e-mail to the technical admnistrators of the site and I'd lke to keep this feature in the new Koha based system. I'm wondering how to implement it. Shluld I rather use Mail::Sendmail directly, or use the letters module... ? any advice ?
20:24 chris             email checkout slips too
20:23 paul_p            granular permissions too imo (although it can be improved in koha)
20:23 chris             that makes 3
20:23 chris             yep
20:23 paul_p            (offline circ & new acquisition module)
20:23 paul_p            chris++
20:22 chris             i know at least 2 things that LL have listed as LEK only are in 3.2.0 ... i think we need our own list
20:21 brendan           hey chris
20:21 brendan           hi |Lupin|
20:21 chris             speaking of which we probably need to start on a changelog soon (for the release)
20:21 |Lupin|           hi brendan
20:18 sekjal            our worst part right now is getting our payments to work.  not only does our parent institution cut the checks, but we do a lot of consortial buying
20:18 sekjal            paul_p: I like some of the changes Biblibre has made to the data structure for Acquisitions.  I've been struggling with Acq for my institution, and can't wait to upgrade to 3.2
20:16 paul_p            too bad... it does not work at all (Search.pm compilation error :( )
20:12 ricardo           " hdl_laptop and paul_p introduced the http://biblibre_head.git.biblibre.com "
20:12 ricardo           paul_p: http://wiki.koha.org/doku.php?id=en:events:meetings:irc_meetings:meetingnotes09oct07
20:11 ricardo           sekjal: Right  :)
20:11 sekjal            http://biblibre_head.git.biblibre.com
20:10 paul_p            it's something like koha_head.git.biblibre.com
20:09 ricardo           paul_p: Let me see if I can help you
20:09 paul_p            and have nothing to retrieve it.
20:09 paul_p            I wanted to test some things on our 3.2 koha setup, before a demo, but I don't remember the url...
20:09 ricardo           paul_p: Sorry to hear that  :(
20:08 paul_p            hello world. connected through mibbit, as my dell laptop seems dead (blank screen...)
20:08 ricardo           paul_p: Good evening Paul! :)
20:06 ricardo           chris: That sounds something from the "X-Files"  ;-)
20:05 chris             but now i have to go build an alien with kahu
20:05 ricardo           chris: OK, thanks for the info
20:05 |Lupin|           chris: ok, thanks
20:05 chris             hdl is fixing a few last things
20:04 chris             if you quickly translate you might beat it
20:04 ricardo           chris: I'm just running the "Web Installer" in a koha 3.0.x git installation ... and seeing things that I haven't yet translated to Portuguese  :(  How's the release plan of 3.0.4?
20:03 chris             then merge that if it looks ok
20:02 chris             cherry pick
20:02 chris             git checkout -b newbranch
20:02 chris             eg git checkout master
20:02 * chris_n2        finds it humerus that Firefox has determined that the .NET and Windows Presentation Foundation plugins cause instability....
20:02 chris             when i apply cherry-picks i usually apply them to a clean branch
20:01 |Lupin|           chris: right ! thanks !!
20:00 chris             thats what you want to use |Lupin|
20:00 chris             git stash
19:57 pianohackr|work   bbl
19:54 pianohackr|work   ahh, okay.
19:54 |Lupin|           pianohackr|work: the thing is I'm cherry-picking a few patches but don't want to keep them exactly as they are, that's why I'm doing these odd things...
19:54 pianohackr|work   np, hope i didn't mess you up too much in the process :)
19:53 |Lupin|           pianohackr|work: right... thanks a lot.
19:52 pianohackr|work   chris: I had a question for gmcharlt earlier about a dev branch and rebase/merge, was curious what you thought
19:51 pianohackr|work   |Lupin|: git-reset HEAD should do it (without --hard, will only affect the index)
19:50 * pianohackr|work thinks cherry-pick is the right way to copy a change over
19:50 |Lupin|           pianohackr|work: yep...
19:50 |Lupin|           ah or maybe the right way to do that would be to git format-patch the thing to be applied and then to apply it ?
19:50 pianohackr|work   |Lupin|: you want to take your changes out of the index?
19:49 * chris_n2        thinks an empty index sounds a bit scarry
19:49 |Lupin|           chris: after a cherry-pick -n, to have just the working copy modifiedand to be able to git diff, git diff --check...
19:47 chris             why would you want to do that
19:47 chris             ?
19:47 * |Lupin|         is also wondering whether there is a way to empty the index
19:46 |Lupin|           chris: this is precisely why I wanted to avoid the burden to do a git log, copy/pasting the hashes...
19:46 ricardo           chris: Hi chris  :)
19:44 chris             im all about typing less
19:44 |Lupin|           great, thanks
19:43 chris             :)
19:43 |Lupin|           ah yes it works !
19:43 chris_n2          it seems you can also 'git diff --check HEAD HEAD~1' or even HEAD~1 HEAD~2 etc
19:42 |Lupin|           chris: but this wouldn't accept the --check option, would it ?
19:42 chris             git show
19:42 chris             since just the last one
19:42 chris             or, in your case
19:42 chris             git show commit id
19:42 |Lupin|           (to avoid botheringwith the commit ids...) ?
19:42 chris             probably but an easier way of doing that is
19:41 |Lupin|           chris: ah, ok it's not possible to do it with HEAD and HEAD^?
19:41 chris             find the 2 commit ids
19:41 chris             git log
19:41 chris             just the commit ids
19:40 |Lupin|           HEAD..HEAD^ ?
19:40 |Lupin|           if one wants to chaéck that the last commit did not introduce any whitespace problems, how does one do ? git diff --check I guess, but how to specify the two commits ?
19:39 |Lupin|           hi chris and thanks for the explanation
19:38 sekjal            morning, chris
19:38 pianohackr|work   hi, chris. good morning
19:38 pianohackr|work   uncommitted to index, yes
19:37 chris             if you call it without any parameters it will show you the uncommitted changes in your working tree
19:37 chris             you can make git diff show you the diff between any 2 commits
19:36 chris_n2          hello chris
19:36 chris             morning
19:34 pianohackr|work   |Lupin|: you can see difference between HEAD and working tree with, of course, git diff HEAD
19:34 pianohackr|work   |Lupin|: did I answer your question?
19:32 |Lupin|           pianohackr|work: ok. In a way I realise my quesiton did not really make sense... "what there is in the index" does not make much sense...
19:32 pianohackr|work   man page confirms
19:31 pianohackr|work   |Lupin|: a quick experiment says that it compares working copy and index
19:30 |Lupin|           pianohackr|work: doens't git diff show differences betwwen HEAD and the working copy rather that the diff between working copy and index ?
19:25 pianohackr|work   git status will, of course, give you a summary
19:25 pianohackr|work   |Lupin|: you can see the differences between the index and working tree with git diff
19:24 |Lupin|           anyone knows how to see the content ofgit's index, please ?
19:20 ricardo           http://jarrodspillers.com/articles/git-merge-vs-git-rebase-avoiding-rebase-hell
19:20 ricardo           git merge vs git rebase: avoiding rebase hell
19:20 * sekjal          is reading this one: http://blog.experimentalworks.net/2009/03/merge-vs-rebase-a-deep-dive-into-the-mysteries-of-revision-control/
19:20 ricardo           pianohackr|work: LOL!
19:19 ricardo           (searching again...)
19:19 pianohackr|work   I think linus torvalds must have had some troubles learning git, and he invented the dang thing
19:19 ricardo           sekjal: There's a good one (with pictures) at
19:19 ricardo           pianohackr|work / |Lupin|: Thanks for showing that I'm not the only one that had / has some problems learning to use git
19:18 * sekjal          is reading an article on when to use merge vs. when to use rebase
19:17 ricardo           Eheh
19:17 |Lupin|           :-))))
19:17 ricardo           |Lupin|: Sébastien, my friend... I have been hearing voices long time ago!  ;-)
19:17 |Lupin|           ricardo: agreed
19:17 pianohackr|work   ricardo: oh, very much so. it's just useful enough to outweigh it, though
19:16 pianohackr|work   gmcharlt: if you're around, was curious how you wanted me to manage the prefs-submit branch (which sysprefs-editor is based on): rebase or merge later changes, do nothing, ...?
19:16 ricardo           I actually think that "git is hard"... to learn, I mean (on several levels). Don't get me wrong. I like it very much. But it's not exactly intuitive in several aspects (IMHO)
19:16 |Lupin|           ricardo: no I didn't say anything ! are you sarrting to uhear voices like Jeane d'Arc ? :-))
19:15 ricardo           |Lupin|: What? You said something?  ;-)
19:15 sekjal            I'm still getting my institution's dev plan in place
19:15 |Lupin|           I'll investigate further by myself
19:14 sekjal            pianohackr|work: you've actually done the process before, so you're more an authority than I.
19:14 |Lupin|           just forget about anything I said, please
19:14 |Lupin|           oh well
19:14 |Lupin|           but I expected the patch to be bigger
19:14 |Lupin|           I solved that
19:14 |Lupin|           which introduced a merged conflict
19:14 pianohackr|work   sekjal: though I'm by no means an authority!
19:14 |Lupin|           I just cherry-picked a patch
19:14 |Lupin|           while we are there...
19:14 |Lupin|           :)
19:14 ricardo           sekjal: LOL!
19:14 sekjal            looks like I tuned in the right Saturday; Git tips!
19:13 ricardo           pianohackr|work: right
19:13 pianohackr|work   ricardo: exactly, though that can be configured
19:13 sekjal            hi, ricardo
19:13 ricardo           Hi sekjal
19:13 ricardo           pianohackr|work: "git pull" by default (*without* "--rebase") does a "merge" instead of a "rebase", right?
19:13 sekjal            hey, pianohackr|work
19:13 |Lupin|           pianohackr|work: ok
19:13 pianohackr|work   sekjal: hi
19:12 pianohackr|work   |Lupin|: you can also use git pull or git pull --rebase, which will do both steps for you
19:12 pianohackr|work   |Lupin|: anything involving remote code, like a rebase or merge
19:11 |Lupin|           pianohackr|work: so... doing a git fetch prior to anything else would be a reasonable rule of thumb ?
19:11 pianohackr|work   heh
19:11 * sekjal          jumps back into chat
19:11 ricardo           So, I guess I'm now officially *three* steps above "git newbie"!  ;-)
19:11 ricardo           pianohackr|work: Right
19:11 pianohackr|work   very much, that's tripped me up more than once
19:10 ricardo           pianohackr|work: I see... "False friend", I guess
19:10 pianohackr|work   nope
19:10 ricardo           pianohackr|work: Right... The problem that I had was |Lupin| question. I though that if I did a "git rebase origin/3.0.x" it would fetch the changes from "origin/3.0.x" first
19:09 pianohackr|work   git-pull = git-fetch then git-merge; git-pull --rebase = git-fetch then git-rebase
19:08 pianohackr|work   |Lupin|: you have to git-fetch before a git-rebase
19:07 |Lupin|           pianohackr|work: even if you rebase on, say, origin/3.0.x you have to pull before, or the rebase will pull ?
19:07 pianohackr|work   yup, that's entirely normal
19:06 ricardo           "ric30x" only sees the "remote" changes, after I update the "3.0.x" branch (or maybe what it sees is the "local" changes of 3.0.x)
19:06 ricardo           And I have a branch called "ric30x" that is based on "3.0.x"
19:06 ricardo           I have a local branch called "3.0.x" that has it's "remote" set to "origin/3.0.x"
19:05 pianohackr|work   nothing you've done wrong, just a slight idiosyncrasy that git pull --rebase takes care of for you
19:05 ricardo           pianohackr|work: Yeah... That's what it's happening to me.
19:05 pianohackr|work   ricardo: you do have to update your local copy of origin/3.0.x before you can rebase on it
19:03 ricardo           Seems to have worked  :)
19:03 ricardo           OK
19:03 ricardo           "Fast-forwarded 3.0.x to a5edf5011a599108311bb2569d4bfffd6a222ef3."
19:02 ricardo           (This will take a while... I hadn't touch this Virtual Machine in the last month or so. So, I guess it's natural that it is this "far behind")
19:01 ricardo           Receiving objects:  33% (2266/6866), 13.31 MiB | 89 KiB/s
19:01 ricardo           remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2933/2933), done.
19:01 ricardo           remote: Counting objects: 7934, done.
19:01 ricardo           # git pull --rebase
19:01 ricardo           pianohackr|work: Yes, although my branches don't usually track very well. I must be doing something wrong, but I'm not sure what, either  :(
19:00 pianohackr|work   yes; all git rebase does is rebase one local branch over another
19:00 ricardo           pianohackr|work:  Maybe it's the one that you're implying "git rebase" assumes that you did a "git fetch" first
19:00 pianohackr|work   ricardo: are you familiar with remote tracking branches?
18:59 ricardo           pianohackr|work: I'll do a "git pull --rebase" instead (I guess there's some difference between "git rebase" and "git pull --rebase" but I don't know what)
18:58 pianohackr|work   git fetch?
18:58 ricardo           No it's not...
18:58 ricardo           Current branch 3.0.x is up to date.
18:58 ricardo           ricardokohaclone # git rebase origin/3.0.x
18:54 ricardo           :)
18:54 |Lupin|           np :)
18:51 ricardo           |Lupin|: Ah, that would make sense, indeed. But no, that wasn't the case
18:51 pianohackr|work   |Lupin|: ahh, nope, thanks for asking though-
18:50 |Lupin|           ricardo: I assumed you and Jesse started to talk about french because of a translation problem he had
18:50 |Lupin|           ricardo: np.
18:48 ricardo           |Lupin|: I think that I haven't bumped yet in any area that I only had a French translation that was troublesome for me. But thanks for asking. I'll let you know, if that happens, eheh
18:47 ricardo           |Lupin|: Thanks  :)
18:47 |Lupin|           ricardo: that one was very well chosen
18:47 |Lupin|           any need for a french native speaker for translating or so ?
18:47 ricardo           |Lupin|: "Touché"!  ;-)
18:46 |Lupin|           ricardo: well I assume it's hard to not be rusty when you don't have an opportunity to practice
18:46 ricardo           |Lupin|: Busy with the Portuguese translation and testing Koha in some setups. But I have been worse, thanks. And you?
18:46 |Lupin|           ricardo: nice to see you again..how are you ?
18:46 ricardo           |Lupin|: I was just saying pianohackr|work (Jesse) that my "French" is incredibly "rusty". Although I learned it for 5 years in High School  :(
18:45 ricardo           |Lupin|: Hi Sébastien!  :)
18:45 |Lupin|           hi ricardo
18:12 ricardo           Actually, I think that I didn't boot my local virtual machines in the last several months. I'm mostly using the VPS now
18:11 ricardo__         pianohackr|work: LOL! True, eheh...
18:11 pianohackr|work   *eh
18:11 pianohackr|work   ricardo: installers are only kidding about such things when you don't want them to be, en?
18:09 ricardo__         ... and another network reset by the VirtualBox installer
18:07 pianohackr|work   ahh, okay.
18:07 ricardo_          pianohackr|work: Nope... The VPS is on Xen. It's actually "Rackspace Cloud" (ex-"Mosso"). VirtualBox is just for my local Virtual Machines (running on my laptop)
18:05 pianohackr|work   is this vps on virtualbox?
18:05 ricardo_          (Yep... The VirtualBox installer isn't kidding when it says that it resets the network connection!  ;-)
17:59 * ricardo         is updating VirtualBox from 3.0.4 to 3.0.8 (on Windows)
17:54 munin             ricardo: The operation succeeded.
17:54 ricardo           @later tell hdl_laptop I read your private messages. Thank you very much for doing a bulkmarcimport in your data. I see that you're not experiencing the same problem. I guess that I'll have to test this further on Monday, at work, then
17:50 ricardo           pianohackr|work: Right
17:50 pianohackr|work   I've noticed a lot of spurious sessions from web crawling
17:49 pianohackr|work   ahhh
17:49 ricardo           It was being hit bad... by Googlebot!
17:49 ricardo           I just found out why a VPS of mine with 256 Megs of RAM , running Koha 3.0.x on Debian 5.0.3 was having problems and huge memory leaks...
17:48 ricardo           pianohackr|work: I'm cool, thanks...
17:48 ricardo           hdl_laptop: Are you there? Just read your private message. Thanks for testing this
17:48 pianohackr|work   how are you?
17:48 ricardo           pianohackr|work: Hi Jesse!
17:48 pianohackr|work   hi, ricardo
17:47 ricardo           Hi all
16:30 pianohackr|work   hi, chris_n2
16:28 chris_n2          howdy Jesse
16:15 pianohackr|work   hi Sebastien
16:04 |Lupin|           hello Jesse
12:50 |Lupin|           howdy chris_n2
12:50 hdl_laptop        hi  chris_n2
12:50 * chris_n2        greets hdl_laptop and |Lupin|
12:48 hdl_laptop        nengard ?
12:42 |Lupin|           hdl_laptop: yes !
12:42 hdl_laptop        |Lupin|: around ?
12:37 |Lupin|           basically my problem is that the item numbers are not inserted in the item records as (I thought) they should be
12:36 |Lupin|           is there anybody who could help me to use the AddItem and ModItem functions, pls ?
12:12 |Lupin|           hi again everybody
08:08 |Lupin|           hello Ropuch :)
08:06 Ropuch            Hi |Lupin|
08:00 |Lupin|           hello there
03:14 drupsta           Hello?
03:11 drupsta           is anyone here to help me out with a fines.pl problem
03:11 drupsta           Hello all
03:10 drupsta           Hi