Time Nick Message 11:28 |Lupin| back after lunch 10:58 ebegin bb soon 10:54 kf good morning ebegin 10:43 ebegin good morning #koha 10:02 |Lupin| hmm, was a permission problem... the Perl message as not very helpful 09:55 |Lupin| and C4/Context.pm is in the first directory in @INC ! 09:55 |Lupin| Can't locate C4/Context.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /home/seb/src/koha ... 09:55 |Lupin| today something weird happens with koha. 09:54 |Lupin| hello, there ! 09:31 munin chris: ecorrado was last seen in #koha 3 weeks, 6 days, 12 hours, 49 minutes, and 52 seconds ago: <ecorrado> taht solitare image is funny 09:31 chris @seen ecorrado 07:52 veki chris: maybe this link i s useful http://www.eln.bc.ca/view.php?id=1085 07:36 veki chris: indeed, LOL 07:34 chris im fairly sure they make these almost incomprehensible on purpose 07:33 chris wow that certainly looks like an ISO standard alright 07:19 veki hdl_laptop: maybe you can look at this too: http://www.nla.gov.au/librariesaustralia/isoill.html 07:18 veki hdl_laptop: please look this http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/iso/ill/stanprf.htm 07:18 veki hdl_laptop: ok, I gues that Marc21 compliance can do that work. 07:17 hdl_laptop But do you have some docs to hint to what kind of support you are asking ? 07:17 hdl_laptop veki: I donot think so. 07:15 veki does KOHA suport ISO ILL standard(s)? 06:00 kf good morning :) 04:53 Amit hi hdl 04:16 Amit hi Jo 04:15 Jo morning Amit 03:24 Amit good morning #koha 03:24 Amit hi chris, 03:23 Jo cool 02:57 richard hi jo. just saw your email 02:56 Jo Katipo Richard :) 02:56 Jo Richard: are you about? 23:37 pianohacker Good night, all 23:26 |Lupin| thanks , have a nice day chris :) 23:26 chris sleep well 23:26 pianohacker bye 23:25 |Lupin| okay, time to go sleeping. So long! 23:23 |Lupin| I hope I can have the koha set up soon so I'll have something to show you 23:23 |Lupin| thanks to all of you :) 23:23 |Lupin| :) 23:22 Jo it is actually really helpful to participate in this 'thinking it through' process... h 23:22 Jo (I think I drove people mad in the end... Nicole stopped just short of slapping me with a: "stop overthinking it" message ! 23:21 Jo absolutely 23:20 pianohacker We're happy to help 23:20 pianohacker |Lupin|: That being quite the understatement :) 23:18 |Lupin| anyway. I don't want you guys to think I'm frustrated or anything like that, it's not true at all. I'm just strongly thinking and asking myself questions, it is certainly not obvious on IRC to distinguish frustration from questionning. 23:17 |Lupin| Jo: yes, but you have to enter both, whereas I was looking for a way to do it such that when a record is identified by an item type, you don't have to give the ccode explicitly 23:16 Jo 1 ccode being a reunion of smaller sets (identified by itemtypes) 23:15 Jo and what you just said is exactly how I have arranged my collection 23:15 Jo I have to head off to other work, I'll think some more about this. 23:14 |Lupin| e.g. by saying that a set of books shold be defined as the reunion of smaller sets 23:14 |Lupin| chris: I just thought one may be able to minimize 23:13 |Lupin| chris: I realize it. 23:13 chris there is not going to be any way to automagically pick them im afraid 23:13 pianohacker The same applies to virtual shelves 23:13 chris it relies on someone cataloguing things correctly 23:13 pianohacker |Lupin|: Maybe, though it's currently a bit inconvenient to set tags as part of cataloging 23:12 chris tags, virtual shelves, ccodes, itemtypes 23:12 chris whatever you choose 23:12 |Lupin| would tags help ? 23:09 Jo its just that as librarians we are used to being told what we can have, not being able to say what we want. 23:09 |Lupin| Jo: just trying to remain agnostic regarding what tool would be best... 23:09 Jo Koha is amazingly versatile 23:09 |Lupin| Jo: ok :) 23:08 |Lupin| the advantage I can see is that it offers good research capabilities, which a reader may want 23:08 Jo don't be disheartend Lupin :) 23:08 |Lupin| I'm really wondering whether koha is the right tool to do this specific thing 23:07 Jo so bulk update at data conversion time, then item by item, while cataloguing new stuff 23:07 Jo and if you choose ccode then for advanced search to work every item in the collection should be identified by a ccode of some sort 23:07 |Lupin| k 23:06 chris the rest of the time, it relies on the cataloguer assigning the right code 23:06 Jo the problem is that you have to decide wherether advanced sedarch is by itemtype or ccode. 23:06 |Lupin| would these help ? 23:06 |Lupin| what about virtual shelves ? 23:06 |Lupin| not sure either 23:06 chris but certainly when migrating you would do that 23:06 Jo yep. 23:06 chris im not sure you would want to do that as a continual thing 23:06 chris that was a part of a migration 23:05 |Lupin| Jo: but I'd say I'd do that as a fall back, because this does not look very clean to me 23:05 Jo thats how Chris has assigned ccodes to itemtypes 23:05 |Lupin| Jo: sure, this could probabl be done 23:04 Jo and ditto for largeprint item types etc. 23:04 Jo couldn't you do a bulk update for some item types: so run a script which did something like "where itemtypes = audio book eneter<printdisabled> into the ccode field 23:04 |Lupin| pianohacker: yes tha was more or less what I had in mind 23:03 |Lupin| chris: ok. but I meant you would tell him which item types are part of the print disabled collection, sya, and then you just have to give the right item type to the book and koha knows that the collection is the reunion of all the item types... like in a hierarchy... 23:02 chris ahh i was joking ,that if the computer could guess correctly what items were accessible, it would be intelligent :) 23:01 pianohacker For instance: http://jcfld.us.to/cgi-bin/koha/opac-search.pl?q=itype%3ABOOK+OR+itype%3ADVD 23:01 |Lupin| what I didn't understand was why you were saying that 23:01 pianohacker |Lupin|: You can search for multiple item types at once; all a "Print Disabled" collection code would do would be to make it easier to search 23:01 |Lupin| I mean I understood the idea 23:01 |Lupin| yep 23:00 chris or 2001? .. its a common science fiction theme :) 23:00 |Lupin| doesn't matter :) 23:00 |Lupin| but never seen 23:00 |Lupin| yes 23:00 chris where machines began thinking, and realised they didnt need humans anymore 22:59 chris you have heard of the movie 'Terminator' |Lupin| ? 22:59 pianohacker We'd have to send someone back in time to talk to Rosalie Blake, like in Terminator 2 22:58 |Lupin| hmm ? 22:58 chris or it would send terminators after us 22:58 chris we would have to shut it down 22:58 chris if it could reason like that 22:58 |Lupin| too bad 22:58 |Lupin| ah 22:57 pianohacker Koha would not be able to guess that on its own, no 22:56 |Lupin| I mean, I'm looking for a way to have simple rles saying hat braile is ok for print disabled... 22:56 |Lupin| woudl koha guess on its own that an item that has the item type talking book belongs to the print disables ccode ? 22:55 |Lupin| with such a set-up 22:55 |Lupin| but 22:55 |Lupin| right 22:54 pianohacker I think that's what chris was thinking of, as well 22:54 pianohacker My first guess would be to create item types for each form you have ("Talking Book", "Audio Book", "Book"), and have a "Print Disabled" collection code 22:52 |Lupin| good point :) 22:52 pianohacker yes 22:52 |Lupin| does this make sens ? 22:50 |Lupin| and the system will list them, say what is available and where, and in which form. 22:50 |Lupin| find all the books that are accessible for me 22:50 |Lupin| you should be able to say 22:50 |Lupin| so suppose you are a blind user 22:49 |Lupin| and also I want to keep track of whether a book ias available in an accessible form, no matter which form it is. 22:49 |Lupin| I want to keep track of the form 22:49 |Lupin| I want to ctalogue books that are available for print disabled nder different forms 22:48 |Lupin| I think it's very simple 22:48 Jo yep 22:48 |Lupin| but this doesn't matter, the support of the community is precious and helpful 22:48 Jo so articulate clearly what you want to achieve at the end for your users. 22:48 |Lupin| which may be even difeent 22:48 |Lupin| and I guess I'll have to build mine 22:48 |Lupin| sure 22:47 Jo I have only 1 solution, others have equally valid and helpful solutions. 22:47 Jo I am very happy to help you here, and I found loads of support when I was struggling with this issue. 22:47 |Lupin| :) 22:47 Jo koha's flexibility is fantastic, but overwhelming too. 22:47 |Lupin| Right. 22:46 Jo and for me, 1 way stood out as being superior. 22:46 Jo then, once you know where you are heading, you can identity various ways of achieving that result. 22:46 Jo Lupion: I found it easier once I made a clear statement about what I wanted to achieve.i think y 22:45 Jo thats right. 22:45 pianohacker |Lupin|: Correct 22:45 |Lupin| hmm an item can have one ccode and an item type, but it can't have several item types or several ccodes... right ? 22:45 Jo there are 3 of them, and I tried an arrangement empahsiszing iteem types, then truied emphasizing ccodes. 22:45 Jo Lupin, I totally sympathize. As i said, I spent weeks struggling with this and that is why I wrote the blog posts. 22:44 |Lupin| Jo: would you say that it's by plaing with the things that you became (more) familiar ? 22:44 Jo now back to your print disabled example, you could assign a ccode to every item you want part of a specific collction, regardless of what item type they are. 22:42 Jo and ditto for ccode DVD, which clusters togteher 6 different DVD item types, being various combinations of free and rental, then Junior. young adult and Adult. 22:41 Jo which is used to cluster together a bunch of item types: BNM (Maori) BNH (local History) and BN (general adult nonfiction) 22:40 Jo Adult nonfiction is a ccode, 22:40 |Lupin| Jo: So the things like Adult Nonfiction on the site you have given are what ? item types or ccodes ? 22:38 Jo I used itemtypes as specific and ccode to generalize, and default circulation rules (only stating the exceptions to the rule not every rule) 22:38 |Lupin| oh I didn't realize there were two 22:37 Jo tghe second post is much shorter - summary 22:37 |Lupin| Jo: I already read your blog post, thanks. As I said will have to come back to it cause I'm not librarian and it's tough 22:36 |Lupin| this difference vanishes ? 22:36 |Lupin| where there would be no loan of books 22:36 pianohacker Jo seems to have taken the opposite approach with good results, for example 22:35 |Lupin| and in the case we were discussing before 22:35 pianohacker In general, another difference is that itemtypes are more general and ccodes are more specific, but you by no means are required to do so 22:35 |Lupin| ok 22:35 Jo yep. 22:35 pianohacker *ccode 22:35 pianohacker |Lupin|: The main practical difference is that you can set circulation rules by itemtype, but not by circulation code 22:34 Jo these are used to break 73 item types into searchable mnanageable chunks 22:34 pianohacker |Lupin|: They are both, unfortunately, mutually exclusive (on the same item, at least) 22:34 Jo http://opac.koha.catalystdemo.net.nz/cgi-bin/koha/opac-search.pl shows our 12 ccodes 22:34 |Lupin| is that true ? 22:34 |Lupin| whereas ccodes are not 22:34 |Lupin| it seems to me that item types are mutually exclusive 22:33 |Lupin| I see a difference between item types and ccodes, but I'm not sure 22:33 Jo this is where I ended up with tem types and ccodes 22:33 pianohacker confirmed, from the default framework for UNIMARC 22:33 Jo http://library-matters.blogspot.com/2009/03/dont-be-afraid-of-using-lots-of-item.html 22:32 |Lupin| chris: I think so... 22:32 chris if thats where the rest of the item stuff is, then yep 22:32 |Lupin| chris: yep, I assume it's 995 in Unimarc 22:32 chris im not sure where it stores them for UNIMARC 22:32 chris (thats for marc21) 22:31 pianohacker So they're _technically_ marc fields, yes, but it's an artifact of the implementation 22:31 pianohacker |Lupin|: Koha stores items as both holdings tags (952 tags) and as rows in the items SQL table 22:31 |Lupin| hi Jo :) 22:31 Jo (I spent 3 weeks agonizing over CCodes and item types) 22:30 |Lupin| So are ccodes stored as marc fields, or not ? 22:29 pianohacker ccodes are item level only 22:29 |Lupin| both item types and CCodes can be defined at both levels ? 22:28 chris i prefer at itemlevel though 22:28 Jo I'm back 22:28 |Lupin| ok 22:28 chris and no, you can define it at either level 22:28 chris Koha specific |Lupin| 22:28 |Lupin| is it correct that item types are something defined at the item level and never at the bib level ? 22:27 |Lupin| pianohacker: well... I discovered collection codes a few minutes ago so I feel a bit dull... 22:26 |Lupin| Are the concepts of item types and CCodes koha-specific, or rather common and well understood in library science ? 22:26 pianohacker Any particular points we can (attempt to) clear up? 22:26 chris if Jo is around later, she might be able to help 22:26 |Lupin| Will have to come back to it, because for a newbie like me this is a bit fst... 22:25 |Lupin| okay, finished reading 22:19 |Lupin| :) 22:18 chris thank jo, she wrote it :) 22:18 |Lupin| chris: thanks a lot ! 22:18 chris that post might help, at least i hope it does 22:18 |Lupin| how do you know whether it's an item type or a collection code that is more appropriate to represent something ? 22:18 chris http://library-matters.blogspot.com/2009/03/summary-of-discussion-about-item-types.html 22:17 |Lupin| hmm 22:17 chris ahh of course 22:17 pianohacker They're really just refinements of item types; for instance, you can have a DVD itemtype and Non-fiction DVD, Children's DVD and Fiction DVD collections 22:17 |Lupin| chris: to your list one could add digital files, braille... 22:16 |Lupin| chris: thanks 22:16 chris let me find Jo's post on it 22:16 chris yes 22:16 |Lupin| actually it's more than that ? 22:16 chris and that could contain 'Talking Books','Audio CD' .. not sure what else 22:16 |Lupin| I thought collections where just published series of books, i.e. a publisher publishes a collection 22:15 chris 'Print Disabled' 22:15 chris that means you could have 22:15 |Lupin| ahah 22:15 chris if you switch on that option in the system preferences 22:15 chris you can limit by collection code 22:15 chris *nod* 22:14 |Lupin| the requirement is that one is able to do a search limited to those books that are accessible 22:14 chris which can have a few itemtypes 22:14 chris maybe one collection code 22:14 |Lupin| would that be one single item type ? 22:14 |Lupin| how wold one represent the itms accessible to print disabled ? 22:13 |Lupin| also 22:13 |Lupin| chris: okay, that was what I was thinking 22:13 chris |Lupin|: it could be all in the same koha 22:13 pianohacker Oh, nevermind. Ignore the idiot 22:12 chris pianohacker: im not sure even masterkey can search paper :-) 22:12 pianohacker Hmm. It looks like pazpar2 is open source but masterkey is not 22:12 |Lupin| but the same koha could, for instance, serve also to keep track of the books of one local library with printed books ? or one should necessarily have two distinct kohas ? 22:11 |Lupin| sure 22:11 chris it will involve someone's time keeping it up to date though 22:11 |Lupin| chris: I see 22:10 chris then koha might well be a good solution 22:10 chris ie they are on paper 22:10 chris but, if there is no way to search the catalogues 22:10 chris no i dont think so 22:09 |Lupin| chris: and my feeling is that, accoding to you, installing a Koha is not the most efficient way to reach the goal, right ? 22:09 chris without the print-disabled bit 22:09 |Lupin| chris: ok. 22:08 chris yep, thats pretty much what worldcat is trying to do 22:08 |Lupin| pianohacker: ah I didn't know this 22:07 |Lupin| chris: in fact what I want is just to provide people a place where they can look for a book on a given field. And as an additional service for those who are print-disabled, I'd like to provide, for each book, a list of libraries where they can find a version of that book they can read 22:07 pianohacker Perhaps something along the lines of Masterkey? 22:06 chris a catalogue of catalogues :) 22:06 chris i was more thinking of worldcat being an example of what you are trying to do 22:06 chris biblios.net otoh do 22:06 chris nope 22:06 |Lupin| chris: but they don't have a Z39.50 server, do they ? 22:05 chris http://www.worldcat.org/advancedsearch 22:05 |Lupin| do they catalogue all the books on the topic, or only those for which they own at least one item ? 22:05 chris |Lupin|: just that you might be able to use it as a source for getting a lot of bibliographical data 22:05 |Lupin| :) 22:04 chris when the wellington theosophical society got Koha, i spend more time teaching the people there how to move a mouse, than how to use koha 22:04 |Lupin| chris: why are you mentionnng it right now ? 22:04 |Lupin| chris: just know the name 22:04 chris *nod* 22:03 |Lupin| these libraries are generally driven by old persons who are very good willing, but not much ready to adapt themselves 22:03 chris http://www.worldcat.org/ 22:03 chris you have seen worldcat eh |Lupin| ? 22:03 |Lupin| yes 22:03 chris heh, thats crazy 22:02 |Lupin| chris: some libraries for the blinds here in France are recording on cassettes and printing their catalogue on paper, so that the catalogue is not even accessible to those who are supposed to read the books 22:02 chris if you cant get realtime data out, that might be the best you can do 22:02 chris yours might be the best of the rest then 22:02 |Lupin| chris: definitely not, and they probably never will 22:02 chris *nod* 22:01 |Lupin| Also, one of the important thing is to catalogue any material accessible to print-disabled persons, no matter whehther it is available somewhere for loan, for buying... 22:00 chris do they all have z3950 servers? 22:00 |Lupin| chris: hmm... the roblem is that not all of them have APIs. 22:00 chris and then returns you the results, which you then present in a way you like 21:59 chris so when you do a search, it searches 10 library catalogues 21:59 chris and then reformat the results 21:59 chris |Lupin|: i think it would be nicer to have targets that you search 21:59 |Lupin| chris: yeah, I kind of realised that, so I was wondering how to cope with that, perhaps just giving one URL for each holding, or something like that ? Or is the approach completely wrong ? 21:58 chris |Lupin|: the problem i can see with your approach is keeping it up to date 21:58 imp chris: thx for the pointer :) 21:58 chris |Lupin|: i know you are not dumb :) 21:58 chris then koha can search itself, and kete 21:57 chris but if you use something like kete 21:57 chris imp: nope koha is a LMS, not a digital library system 21:57 |Lupin| chris: as I already said, I _completely_ new to the field (new reads dumb) 21:57 imp is it possible to search for stuff inside of some digital stuff stored in koha, like pdfs? 21:57 chris until one of the libraries changes something 21:57 |Lupin| oh oh 21:56 chris accurate for about 20 seconds 21:56 |Lupin| or at least an accurate one ? 21:56 |Lupin| Setting up a koha, declare all the libraries, catalogue the bibliographic records and declare all the holdings, would that be the right approach ? 21:55 |Lupin| Moreover, I'd like to distinguish those items that are accessible to print disabled persons, either because they are available as files, or because they are in braille, audiobooks, etc. 21:54 |Lupin| so I'd like to kep track of all the books on philosoophy, say, that are present in a certain number of libraries 21:54 |Lupin| let's say it's philosophy 21:53 |Lupin| it's to create a specialized cataloge on one theme 21:53 |Lupin| just a first thought 21:53 |Lupin| idea is not completely clear yet 21:53 |Lupin| and wold like to know whether koha would be suitable for that. 21:52 |Lupin| I'm thinking about one possible use of koha 21:52 pianohacker What's up? 21:52 |Lupin| pianohacker: it's loose enough 21:52 pianohacker How loose is your "librarians" requirement? 21:51 |Lupin| some librarians around, please ? 21:49 wizzyrea last update, rather 21:49 wizzyrea oh, after our last install items apparently were'nt getting tagged with their current location 21:46 pianohacker wizzyrea: What was your curious problem? 21:46 |Lupin| hello ! 21:24 Jo :) its my silly sticky keyboard 21:23 gmcharlt Jo: at least that's a new mispelling ;) 21:23 Jo Galen - sorry 21:23 Jo Hi Gelen 21:15 gmcharlt hi Jo 21:14 chris back 21:07 Jo morning all 20:55 wizzyrea ^.^ I try to be entertaining 20:50 pianohacker You can be curiously problematic sometimes 20:49 wizzyrea I have kind of a curious problem 20:49 richard hi hdl_laptop 20:48 hdl_laptop hi richard 20:45 richard hi 19:42 chris bb later 18:54 gmcharlt cool 18:54 owen Okay, and I'll contact rach before I do anything with the logo 18:53 gmcharlt to suggest a general name 18:53 gmcharlt misc/interface_customization 18:53 gmcharlt yes 18:52 owen Create a new directory there for images? 18:51 gmcharlt wouldn't hurt to put them in the OPAC imagedir, but since the webserver won't actually be serving them, some place in misc might be better 18:51 owen I'm not sure about that one. 18:50 gmcharlt will we need signoff by rach to include the source for the Koha logo? 18:50 owen Where do you think I should put them? Alongside other OPAC images? 18:50 gmcharlt owen: good idea 18:49 owen gmcharlt: I'd like to add to git the source files for a couple of images: the Koha logo and the backgrond image used by the cart and lists buttons 18:45 gmcharlt ebegin: feel free to edit page to expand the acronyms 18:44 ebegin ok, thanks :) 18:44 gmcharlt LMS = "library management system" = ILS 18:43 ebegin gmcharlt, about the welcome message, what does LMS stand for? 18:36 munin gmcharlt: The operation succeeded. Quote #12 added. 18:36 gmcharlt @quote add <owen> Every time you check in a book a little video loads and Nancy Pearl recites her capsule review of it. 18:35 owen Every time you check in a book a little video loads and Nancy Pearl recites her capsule review of it. 18:34 gmcharlt owen: before I support you on your HTML5 RFC, I have to ask you what video codec the Koha project should support ;) 18:33 owen It's the logical-extension of the tables-are-bad debate! 18:33 owen I feel that in order to be usable by the widest variety of browsers Koha should be designed to use HTML 2. 18:32 gmcharlt owen: go for lost causes - insist on XHTML2 compliance! 17:30 pianohacker Hi 17:30 chris hi all 17:14 hdl_laptop hi gmcharlt 17:13 pianohacker Hello 17:13 gmcharlt hi folks 16:48 |Lupin| till soon, everybody 16:46 |Lupin| hi gmcharlt ! 16:24 Sharon Finally out of all my meetings, so I can log into all my chatrooms 16:24 Sharon Hiya Owen 16:24 owen Hi Sharon 16:24 atz if the object decides in one version to store data at $self->{modify} in one version, and someplace else in another, it's the coder's fault for relying on the particularity of the data location and not the method api 16:24 owen Thanks atz. I was trying fixes without really know exactly what I was doing. I'm still not sure whether the first version worked at one time. 16:23 atz owen: it's an object... you have to use the methods 16:00 pianohacker $ git log -p opac/opac-userupdate.pl 15:59 pianohacker *beginning 15:59 pianohacker It looks like that sort of syntax (if not that exact line) was present in the file from the beginnig 15:52 owen Perhaps it didn't :) 15:51 pianohacker owen: To be honest, I have no idea how $query->{'modify'} worked in the first place 15:50 owen Can anyone explain to me why the syntax "$query->{'modify'}" would fail to work when "$query->param('modify')" would? 15:39 |Lupin| ebegin++ 15:38 ebegin It's ok to use bitfield... but the user shouldn't have to care about it... The UI should be checkboxes. 15:37 pianohacker k, cool 15:37 kf pianohacker: had no time for bug report about professional to organisation linking today :( will try again tomorrow 15:36 pianohacker One day, I hope to send a database upgrade and some code to make sense of that field 15:35 pianohacker ebegin: Hey, I'm all for a consistency patch right there 15:35 ebegin pianohacker, I agree... that why we should'nt test them with < or > 15:34 pianohacker Not only are the docs confusing, but actually inconsistent with the code 15:34 pianohacker It resembles a bitmask, but only partially 15:34 pianohacker ebegin: The 'hidden' field is not consistent in any shape or form 15:31 ebegin yep 15:30 pianohacker ebegin: Is it the 'hidden' field? 15:30 ebegin ok.. trying to figure out the reason of a condition in cataloguing/addbiblio.pl (search for ">= 4") 15:29 hdl_laptop working for France telecom on security issues 15:28 ebegin hdl_laptop, used to? Not working anymore? 15:28 hdl_laptop used to work in France with us 15:28 hdl_laptop Antoine Franault 15:27 ebegin who is (was) toins? 15:26 |Lupin| owen: never tried this feature 15:24 owen Anyone else finding that opac-userupdate.pl isn't sending email to the administrator? 15:20 |Lupin| ebegin: ok 15:19 pianohacker Hey, eric 15:19 ebegin hi pianohacker 15:18 pianohacker Good morning 15:18 ebegin 1 = ! OPAC Intranet Editor Collaps 15:17 ebegin 4 = ! OPAC Intranet Editor !Collapse 15:17 ebegin 1 won't show it in the OPAC, but in the intranet. The Collapse is used to expand the subfield, but since 009 doesn't have subfield, the collapse is irrelevant 15:15 |Lupin| ebegin: so 1 won't have the effect of showing it everywhere, but you are suggesting this value because it will make the situation mbetter than it is now,correct ? 15:14 |Lupin| s/intranet/opac/ 15:14 ebegin yes, don't show 15:14 |Lupin| ebegin: !Intranet means it won't work in the Intranet 15:14 ebegin opposite, sorry :) 15:13 ebegin Synonyme of expanded 15:13 ebegin |Lupin|, déplier 15:11 ebegin there is an explicit condition on hidden >= 4 in the code... cataloguing/addbiblio.pl 15:11 |Lupin| btw what does Collapse mean ? 15:10 ebegin |Lupin|, set it to 1 (!OPAC, Intranet, Editor, Collapse) 15:10 |Lupin| ebegin: actually, what's your suggestion ? 15:10 |Lupin| I don't know kf 15:09 ebegin I repeat... the problem is with field < 10 AND hidden = 4 ( or any value >=4 ) 15:07 kf perhaps my database entries could give you a hint? 15:06 |Lupin| Maybe time to send an e-mail to the list... 15:06 |Lupin| kf: okay. Thanks a lot for having tried so hard, thanks to ebegin, too. 15:06 kf ok, now im out of ideas :( 15:04 kf hm with 0 its only displaed in MARC View too... perhaps a bug 15:02 kf after setting tab to -1 = ignore I can see 019 in MARC view, but not in Epanded MARC View 15:01 |Lupin| no change in the opac 14:59 |Lupin| let me see what happens in the opac for instance 14:59 kf did setting tab to 0 change anything? 14:59 kf I think only the editor, not sure about it 14:59 |Lupin| (I didn't have the opportunity to check) 14:58 |Lupin| kf: but if the field affects only the editor, it wo't affect the MARC view in opac and staff client, right ? 14:58 kf for example a framework for ill records with only a few fields on one page 14:58 kf so that all fields are on one page, if you like that better 14:58 kf you can change it when adding your own framework 14:57 |Lupin| kf: ahah. 14:57 |Lupin| kf: in other frameworks it works differently ? 14:57 kf but there are some exceptions as 952 fields are managed in items 14:57 kf in the default framework yes 14:57 |Lupin| ebegin: ok 14:56 |Lupin| kf: right, I can't use the editor inmy current configuration 14:55 ebegin |Lupin|, i'm pretty sure that it is a problem with the < 010 field. I set the hidden to 0, and it shows in the Editor. hidden = 4 doesn't show.. It's a bug ... 14:55 |Lupin| so every field numbered xyz is show in tab x, unless the tab field says something diffferent. Is that correct ? 14:55 kf I think you cant work with the editor, as its using javascript? 14:55 kf there is also an items tab, for fields that belong to items and one value for hidden 14:55 |Lupin| kf: ah I see 14:54 kf normally you choose tab nine for 9xx fields, tab 8 for 8xx fields and so on 14:54 kf with managed in tag you can choose in which tag or page you want it to display 14:53 kf the editor is organised in tabs 14:53 |Lupin| kf: I'm a newbie so I know nothing about ILMSs 14:52 |Lupin| kf: I don't understand the meaning, though. Can you please explin ? 14:52 |Lupin| kf: sure, I'll change it 14:50 kf its called managed in tab in staff client, I think -1 is either hidden or items 14:49 kf set it to 0 14:49 kf ok :) 14:49 |Lupin| kf: -1 14:47 |Lupin| kf: let me see 14:47 kf +e 14:47 |Lupin| ok ok 14:47 kf marc_subfield_structur.tab 14:47 |Lupin| kf: do you know where this is stored in the db ? 14:46 kf which value do you have in tab column? 14:46 |Lupin| kf: ah it was not there, ok 14:46 kf I think it isnt, but it wasnt there :) 14:46 |Lupin| kf: not sure whether 019 is meaningful 14:46 kf 21 14:46 kf ok, im using MARC"! 14:45 |Lupin| kf: UNIMARC 14:44 kf lupin, are u using MARC21 or UNIMARC? 14:44 kf ok, I added 019 without subfields successfully in 3.2 -installation 14:43 |Lupin| and in the staff client I don't see anything either 14:42 kf i try adding a new 0xx-field now 14:41 |Lupin| The MARC view starts with 010 ISBN 14:40 |Lupin| actually still don't see anything in the opac 14:40 |Lupin| hmm 14:39 kf ok, I started reading when it was about the OPAC description and how to show it in OPAC :) 14:38 ebegin s/do/does/ 14:38 ebegin But |Lupin| do not see it in the Intranet ;) 14:38 kf yes, but not in OPAC 14:37 kf http://wiki.koha.org/doku.php?id=marc_subfields_structure.tmpl&s[]=marc&s[]=tag&s[]=structure&s[]=administration 14:37 ebegin kf 4 should display in on the Intranet et Editor... 14:37 kf I think it muste be on the wiki too 14:37 kf can you access the help file in staff client from edit subfields page with f1? there is a liste of the values 14:36 |Lupin| I think I mis read the text ebegin pasted on the web for me 14:35 |Lupin| kf: ok ! 14:35 kf try -1: OPAC Intranet Editor Collapsed 14:35 |Lupin| I assume this is the right thing ? 14:35 |Lupin| update marc_subfield_structure set hidden=4 where tagfield='009' and frameworkcode=''; 14:35 kf ok, 4 was the wrong choice :) !OPAC Intranet Editor !Collapsed 14:35 |Lupin| btw, the command used to update the table was: 14:34 |Lupin| kf: thanks ! 14:34 |Lupin| kf: and yes it's a coded field without subfield, but I don't know whether this means there is somethingmore to do 14:33 kf mom I will look it up 14:33 |Lupin| kf: we set it to four 14:33 kf and check if your hidden value allows display in OPAC 14:32 kf perhaps its a problem with coded fields without subfields? 14:32 kf I added 689 and some subfields to the MARC-Framework, its shown in MARC-View and Expanded MARC-View, Expanded MARC-View uses the description 14:31 kf mom testing :) 14:29 |Lupin| kf: that's what I thought, too, but even in thae marc view the field does not appear at all 14:27 kf I think this description is used in the MARC-View 14:25 |Lupin| I thought both, e.g. because each field has two descriptions, one for OPAC and one for staff client... 14:24 |Lupin| is the default framework used only in the staff client, or also in the opac, actually ? 14:19 |Lupin| ebegin: but the text I defined for the 09 field appears in te database 14:19 |Lupin| ahah 14:18 ebegin |Lupin|, false alarm... it doesn't show... 14:17 ebegin grr... |Lupin|, it shows in the editor... but not at the right place... it's located before 001, not after 008... 13:57 |Lupin| ebegin: ah, you tried, thanks a lot !! 13:55 ebegin ok... you are not getting crazy |Lupin|, I don't see it either :) 13:54 |Lupin| ebegin: I think the edit feature requires javascript so I can't test that. 13:53 |Lupin| ebegin: 4 13:51 ebegin Which hidden value did you set? 13:50 ebegin Do you see it when you try to edit your record? 13:45 |Lupin| I can't see the 009 field in the staff client 13:45 |Lupin| okay, I have modified the database and it does stillnot work, I think 13:32 |Lupin| ebegin: ok, thanks !! 13:31 ebegin marc_subfield_structure » hidden 13:30 |Lupin| ebegin (or someone else): any hint which column in which ta ble to modify ? 13:29 |Lupin| ebegin: it's because these bttons are not simple buttons, they have onsubmit attributes that make they require js 13:28 |Lupin| ebegin: no no it's not the first time that happens 13:27 ebegin that is strange. 13:25 |Lupin| ebegin: actually the submit button does not work :/ 13:25 |Lupin| ebegin: hanks 13:25 ebegin In the top right corner of your page, there is a ?, this is a contextual help 13:24 ebegin http://pastebin.ca/1485657 13:23 |Lupin| "(voir aide en ligne)" is not a link 13:23 |Lupin| ebegin: actually lynx does not show a link 13:23 ebegin in the help file linked to the page 13:23 |Lupin| is the semantics fo the value documented somewhere ? 13:22 ebegin Your option is to change it directly in the database then 13:22 |Lupin| ebegin: so you said 4 ? 13:22 |Lupin| ah and I can modify the 0 13:22 |Lupin| ebegin: I can see the "hidden (0)" thing 13:22 ebegin s/uses/use/ 13:21 ebegin it does uses javascript... 13:20 |Lupin| cause I'm using lynx... 13:20 |Lupin| depends if it uses javascript or not 13:20 |Lupin| I'm not sure I can do that 13:20 |Lupin| hmm 13:17 ebegin Set the hidden (caché) field to something like 4 (show Expanded in Intranet and Editor, don't show in OPAC) 13:16 |Lupin| :) 13:15 ebegin haha... |Lupin| forget munin comment :) 13:15 munin |Lupin|: downloading the Perl source 13:15 |Lupin| @ Ancien 001 sous-champ ignoré Supprimer 13:14 |Lupin| actually I kcan see the @ hdl_laptop was mentionning 13:14 ebegin Click on the Display more constraints link (the first one) 13:14 ebegin Make sure you have a value in the Managed in Tab (usually 0) 13:13 ebegin Then click the Edit Subfields button 13:12 ebegin yes, but only for editing purpose. Click on it 13:12 |Lupin| hdl_laptop ebegin: still, there is the subfields link for this field 13:11 |Lupin| but I don't see the "@" sign you were mentionning hdl_laptop 13:11 |Lupin| hmm the field appears in the frawework 13:11 |Lupin| now it's there 13:11 |Lupin| oh 13:06 hdl_laptop admin/frameworks/ 13:04 |Lupin| hdl_laptop: either in terms of web interfrace, or perhaps simpler, in terms of tables in the db 13:04 |Lupin| hdl_laptop: where should I look to see that ? 13:03 hdl_laptop do you have 009 and subfield "@" (stands for no_subfields) in your "grille de catalogage" ? 13:02 |Lupin| hdl_laptop: <controlfield tag="009">58</controlfield> 13:02 |Lupin| hdl_laptop: sorry it tookme so long 12:55 ebegin |Lupin| hdl_laptop but the framework still have a Subfields link beside 009 12:55 hdl_laptop ebegin: same for USMARC 009 has no subfields 12:54 |Lupin| cause 009 does not hae subfields in Unimarc 12:54 ebegin yes 12:54 |Lupin| ebegin: you mean for each field ? 12:53 ebegin |Lupin|, when you edit your framework, you should have a Subfields link. Unless this is different in Unimarc. 12:47 |Lupin| ebegin: there is no subfield for the 009 field I 'm trying to display 12:46 ebegin |Lupin|, whn you edit the subfield, make sure you set the hidden (caché) value located in the « display more constraints » section 12:45 |Lupin| hdl_laptop: no, not yet. Let me see. 12:42 hdl_laptop have you checked 009 field was in database biblioitems.marcxml ? 12:39 |Lupin| hdl_laptop: is there something else to change, pls ? 12:39 |Lupin| hdl_laptop: I just modified the default framework and added some text to dsplay besides to field 009, same text for OPAC and staff client, but the field is not displayed... 12:38 |Lupin| owen: ok 12:35 |Lupin| owen: I DID not forget the "skip to content" feature". Just a bit busy at the moment. 12:35 owen Hi 12:35 |Lupin| hi owen 12:26 |Lupin| hdl_laptop: ok, thanks. Will see how to add 009 12:26 hdl_laptop yes 12:26 |Lupin| hdl_laptop: framework is "grille de catalogage" in french ? 12:19 hdl_laptop all depends on your framework configuration. 12:15 |Lupin| hdl_laptop: when these fiels are present in a record, where do they show up in Koha ? 12:15 |Lupin| hdl_laptop: np, thanks! 12:14 hdl_laptop sorry 12:14 |Lupin| hdl_laptop: yeah, that's more o less what I discovered in the documentation of themodule. A wéas not aware these fields were special. 12:14 hdl_laptop Note No indicator, no subfield 12:14 hdl_laptop and to add field, MARC::Field->new($tag, $data) 12:14 |Lupin| could any body please give me a hint about how to display additional MARC fields ? 12:13 hdl_laptop |Lupin|: 009 and all fields under 010 are accessed with $field->data 12:13 |Lupin| hi chris 12:10 chris and with those 2 pieces of snarkiness, i bid you all goodnight :) 12:09 chris i just basically said, if you dont know what cron is, you shouldnt really be looking after a linux box 12:09 collum Just reading email from the listsrev. Should someone post that if help is asked from a specific company, that it's customary to pay them? :) 12:09 chris marc is retarded 12:08 |Lupin| ah, fields with tags <010 ddo not have indicaors... 12:00 |Lupin| The field appears in the MARC record, but yaz-marcdump does not provide any content for it...