Time  Nick         Message
02:10 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D12 build #37: ABORTED in 16 hr: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D12/37/
03:35 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D12 build #38: ABORTED in 41 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D12/38/
03:39 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D11 build #415: FAILURE in 3 min 23 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D11/415/
04:04 koha-jenkins Project Koha_21.05_D12 build #5: SUCCESS in 49 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_21.05_D12/5/
04:19 koha-jenkins Project Koha_19.11_D10 build #201: ABORTED in 57 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_19.11_D10/201/
04:27 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D11 build #416: NOW UNSTABLE in 33 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D11/416/
04:53 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_U_Stable build #281: STILL UNSTABLE in 58 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_U_Stable/281/
05:00 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master build #1777: ABORTED in 40 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master/1777/
05:01 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D12 build #39: ABORTED in 44 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D12/39/
05:04 koha-jenkins Project Koha_20.05_U16 build #328: STILL FAILING in 3 min 46 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_20.05_U16/328/
05:05 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_U20 build #210: FAILURE in 4 min 32 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_U20/210/
05:08 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D11 build #417: STILL UNSTABLE in 32 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D11/417/
05:18 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D9 build #1788: STILL UNSTABLE in 42 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D9/1788/
05:33 koha-jenkins Project Koha_19.11_D11 build #17: SUCCESS in 25 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_19.11_D11/17/
05:36 koha-jenkins Project Koha_19.11_D10 build #202: UNSTABLE in 1 hr 16 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_19.11_D10/202/
05:48 koha-jenkins Yippee, build fixed!
05:48 wahanui      Congratulations!
05:48 koha-jenkins Project Koha_20.05_U20 build #366: FIXED in 43 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_20.05_U20/366/
05:49 koha-jenkins Project Koha_19.11_U_Stable build #53: SUCCESS in 31 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_19.11_U_Stable/53/
06:14 koha-jenkins Project Koha_20.05_D10 build #325: ABORTED in 1 hr 9 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_20.05_D10/325/
06:21 reiveune     hello
06:29 koha-jenkins Project Koha_21.05_D11 build #91: SUCCESS in 52 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_21.05_D11/91/
06:38 koha-jenkins Project Koha_21.05_D12 build #6: UNSTABLE in 49 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_21.05_D12/6/
07:22 koha-jenkins Project Koha_19.11_D10 build #203: STILL UNSTABLE in 1 hr 8 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_19.11_D10/203/
07:38 koha-jenkins Project Koha_21.05_U16 build #74: FAILURE in 2 min 50 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_21.05_U16/74/
07:46 huginn`      News from kohagit: Bug 28211: Fix test <https://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=ddef2c6a0d727feaf2c1c92e19ff5e6ef7e19ab1>
07:46 huginn`      News from kohagit: Bug 29263: (bug 24387 follow-up) Fix 'Cancel' link when editing a html custom <https://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=1de9d530f4dd5eac831e9026e9a43b6a2606f5b0>
07:46 huginn`      News from kohagit: Bug 29254: Fix date formatting on the additional contents form <https://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=bcb0dfd8adb4061dfd9886b3c4c98fd862a8b5fd>
07:46 huginn`      News from kohagit: Bug 29153: Fix CodeMirror textareas to work with all languages <https://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=1021b1dc887b61dcac2c02330cbd9269819b28ef>
07:46 huginn`      News from kohagit: Bug 29233: Correct missed jQueryUI datepicker in serials search sidebar <https://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=12436073165355e76fac83de9b2a001435f52691>
07:46 huginn`      News from kohagit: Bug 29232: Clean up obsolete jQueryUI datepicker code from cash register stats template <https://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=2e0d86da7eb23427005ac53a67200f9d2106bc09>
07:46 huginn`      News from kohagit: Bug 29020: Add link on the admin module <https://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=ca55dc3e42c77f41f8c0cf66e6db9aeda4e66842>
07:46 huginn`      News from kohagit: Bug 29020: Add link on the mainpage for users without admin access <https://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=fde5d5f7019728f56a8e16433e52c17dd021dffa>
07:46 huginn`      News from kohagit: Bug 20277: Improve 773 link when $a is present <https://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=78db69fb569b0cf16656fcf092d8025df64fe943>
07:56 ashimema     morning #koha
08:01 ashimema     marcelr around?
08:04 ashimema     or anyone else whose at all close to how 773's work
08:04 ashimema     cait around?
08:04 wahanui      i heard cait around was cait cait1 cait2 cait3 cait4 cait5
08:11 koha-jenkins Project Koha_21.05_U20 build #78: SUCCESS in 33 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_21.05_U20/78/
08:14 koha-jenkins Project Koha_21.05_D11 build #92: SUCCESS in 38 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_21.05_D11/92/
08:18 cait         a little bit around, what's up?
08:20 cait         ashimema: ^
08:25 koha-jenkins Yippee, build fixed!
08:25 wahanui      Congratulations!
08:25 koha-jenkins Project Koha_21.05_D12 build #7: FIXED in 49 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_21.05_D12/7/
08:28 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_U_Stable build #282: FAILURE in 3 min 22 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_U_Stable/282/
08:29 ashimema     trying to get to grips with searches again
08:29 ashimema     for the 773 control number + identifier stuff
08:31 ashimema     the searches that bug 27507 and bug 20310 are entirely different
08:31 huginn`      Bug https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27507 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, joonas.kylmala, Failed QA , Search host record using control number identifier / organization code
08:31 huginn`      Bug https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20310 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, m.de.rooy, RESOLVED FIXED, Article requests: Use details from the host record when submitting an article request on an analytic record without attached items
08:31 ashimema     but I think they should match
08:31 ashimema     they're both using the 773$w to try to look up the host
08:32 ashimema     one looks for 'rcn:controlnumber AND rci:identifier'
08:32 ashimema     whilst the other looks for `rcn:(identifier)controlnumber`
08:32 ashimema     I think the former is right (assuming identifier is present in the $w)
08:32 koha-jenkins Project Koha_21.05_U_Stable build #70: SUCCESS in 57 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_21.05_U_Stable/70/
08:33 ashimema     the `(identifier)controlnumber` form is for looking in the oposite direction isn't it.. i.e doing the components search not the host search
08:35 koha-jenkins Project Koha_21.05_D9 build #74: SUCCESS in 1 hr 0 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_21.05_D9/74/
08:38 koha-jenkins Project Koha_21.05_U18 build #72: SUCCESS in 1 hr 2 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_21.05_U18/72/
08:43 koha-jenkins Yippee, build fixed!
08:43 wahanui      Congratulations!
08:43 koha-jenkins Project Koha_20.05_U16 build #329: FIXED in 32 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_20.05_U16/329/
08:53 ashimema     man 773 is weird
08:53 ashimema     773 is repeatable itself and it looks lie $w is also repeatable
08:53 koha-jenkins Yippee, build fixed!
08:53 wahanui      Congratulations!
08:53 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D11 build #418: FIXED in 39 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D11/418/
08:53 ashimema     so we're already not iterating enough
09:09 ashimema     marcelr, cait see final comment on bug 27507
09:09 huginn`      Bug https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27507 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, joonas.kylmala, Failed QA , Search host record using control number identifier / organization code
09:14 koha-jenkins Project Koha_21.05_U16 build #75: STILL FAILING in 24 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_21.05_U16/75/
09:19 koha-jenkins Yippee, build fixed!
09:19 wahanui      Congratulations!
09:19 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D11_CPAN build #451: FIXED in 50 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D11_CPAN/451/
09:22 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_U_Stable build #283: STILL FAILING in 3 min 3 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_U_Stable/283/
09:28 cait         ashimema: yes $w is repeatable
09:28 cait         in an ideal world we'd need a way to define whch prefix we want to look for
09:29 cait         in our data we delete all the additional $w - the original data will have up to 3
09:29 cait         we are slowly getting there by adding the prefix support i guess
09:30 ashimema     so you agree with my final comment on the bug then?
09:30 ashimema     we can pass MarcOrgCode easily enough to the xslt's as a variable
09:30 ashimema     so we can do that comparison in xslt fairly easil
09:30 ashimema     s/easil/easily/
09:31 koha-jenkins Yippee, build fixed!
09:31 wahanui      Congratulations!
09:31 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D10_My8 build #666: FIXED in 38 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D10_My8/666/
09:35 koha-jenkins Yippee, build fixed!
09:35 wahanui      Congratulations!
09:36 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D9 build #1789: FIXED in 1 hr 0 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D9/1789/
09:40 koha-jenkins Yippee, build fixed!
09:40 wahanui      Congratulations!
09:40 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_U20 build #211: FIXED in 1 hr 7 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_U20/211/
09:51 koha-jenkins Project Koha_20.05_U16 build #330: SUCCESS in 30 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_20.05_U16/330/
10:22 oleonard     Hi all
10:33 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_U20 build #212: SUCCESS in 52 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_U20/212/
10:36 koha-jenkins Yippee, build fixed!
10:36 wahanui      Congratulations!
10:36 koha-jenkins Project Koha_21.05_U16 build #76: FIXED in 1 hr 14 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_21.05_U16/76/
10:39 magnuse      hiya oleonard
10:45 oleonard     Anyone else seeing updatedatabase errors?
10:45 oleonard     DBD::mysql::db do failed: Cannot add or update a child row: a foreign key constraint fails (`koha_kohadev`.`borrower_message_preferences`, CONSTRAINT `borrower_message_preferences_ibfk_3` FOREIGN KEY (`categorycode`) REFERENCES `categories` (`categorycode`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDAT)
11:00 Joubu        oleonard: certainly related to bug 28153
11:00 huginn`      Bug https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28153 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, nick, Pushed to master , Add 'Hold reminder' messaging preference
11:00 oleonard     Yes, but I don't know if it's a quirk of my data or a problem we need to be aware of.
11:01 oleonard     Changing the "INSERT" to "INSERT IGNORE" in the update allows the process to complete.
11:01 Joubu        the last query I guess?
11:02 Joubu        kidclamp: ^^
11:02 Joubu        lunch time for me :)
11:12 koha-jenkins Project Koha_19.11_D10 build #204: ABORTED in 1 hr 58 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_19.11_D10/204/
11:39 tcohen       morning
11:57 marcelr      hi #koha
11:58 marcelr      oleonard: please have a look if bug 24223 is still what you expected from it :)
11:58 huginn`      Bug https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24223 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, oleonard, Passed QA , Convert OpacNav system preference to news block
12:16 * cait       waves
12:16 cait         ashimema: we can pass it... but it's not that easy
12:17 cait         ashimema: MarcOrgCode can be different things - it's a branch level setting
12:17 cait         and if you are connected to a union catlaog, the prefix to use might be that one
12:17 cait         and not the one of yoru library
12:18 cait         not ure we should mix that discussion into the current developments which all seem to still be flexible enough
12:18 marcelr      hi cait
12:18 cait         hi marcelr
12:18 ashimema     humm
12:18 marcelr      and ashimema
12:18 wahanui      ashimema is probably back on security bugs today.. sorry, it's been a bit of a crazy week
12:18 marcelr      another crazy week for ashimema
12:18 cait         wahanui: when is it not a crazy week...
12:18 ashimema     humm
12:19 ashimema     get_marc_host doesn't take branch level org code into account either
12:19 ashimema     dang..
12:19 ashimema     I hadn't though of that one either
12:19 ashimema     every week is a crazy week at the moment it feels
12:19 ashimema     my brain hurts
12:19 marcelr      keep off that great sub haha
12:19 ashimema     procrastinating on 773 links shoulnd't really be a thing.. the other stuff I had to get on with is even more involved and scary though.
12:20 ashimema     hehe
12:20 marcelr      it should be C4::Search
12:20 ashimema     it's a fun sub marcelr
12:20 marcelr      but C4::Auth is a good second one
12:20 ashimema     I dunno
12:20 ashimema     I think it belongs where it is..
12:20 ashimema     but there's allot of cases it doesn't take account of..
12:21 marcelr      lets move all that debatable stuff in plugins :)
12:21 ashimema     branch level MARCOrgCode's, repeatable w subfields, and the search itself I think is wrong..
12:21 marcelr      I wonder if you got the finesses of that search
12:22 marcelr      it is a bit obscure
12:22 ashimema     I'm sure it should be `control-number=X AND cni=Y` rather than control-number=(Y)X`
12:22 ashimema     but hey
12:22 marcelr      all that text parsing where marc forces us to
12:24 ashimema     indeed
12:24 ashimema     fun times
12:24 * ashimema   needs more tea
12:24 cait         what they do know is looking for a record matching the $w
12:25 cait         that's all fine
12:25 cait         we just don't check on the marcorgcode
12:25 cait         it works on "exists in $w" in one record and "exists in 003" in another record
12:25 cait         so we don't have to know which marcorgcode we are looking for
12:25 cait         the problem arises when you have repeatable $w... but maybe that#s a problem for another day? that's how i see it
12:26 ashimema     huh
12:29 marcelr      cait get_marc_host does look at marcorgcode
12:30 marcelr      it uses it to pick the right one
12:30 ashimema     but not at branch level 😉
12:30 marcelr      but ashimema found another edge case :)
12:30 ashimema     and the searches it does are a bit weird
12:30 marcelr      hmmm
12:31 * ashimema   thinks he probably "helped" lead to the search confusion in the first place
12:31 * ashimema   will happily take/share the blame 😛
12:32 marcelr      if you add a loop in the existing loop, we will tackle the various $w subfields alread
12:32 marcelr      y
12:32 ashimema     indeed
12:32 ashimema     I've got a patch in the works for that
12:32 ashimema     what I'm still contemplating is the search thing above
12:33 ashimema     001 won't ever contain (003)001 will it
12:33 ashimema     it's 001 and 003
12:33 marcelr      assumptions are dangerous things
12:33 ashimema     I think we got the direction of the query wrong in get_marc_host
12:33 ashimema     lol
12:34 marcelr      submit your code and i will shoot
12:34 marcelr      (in the air)
12:34 ashimema     lol
12:36 cait         ashimema: from the standard it should be so
12:36 cait         i have not seen (003)001 in the wild
12:36 cait         but
12:36 cait         you might want to link to 035
12:37 cait         the standard is not very clear on if that should be allowed or not
12:37 ashimema     nooo.. don't add 035 into the mix
12:37 ashimema     i'll lose my mind
12:37 * cait       shrugs
12:37 cait         but yes, assuming marcorgcode is the one ... would at leat not work for ours
12:37 cait         marcorgcode for ours is their own library code, all the data comes in linked with the union catalog org corde
12:37 * cait       sputters
12:37 cait         can't type today
12:38 cait         the initial one i had a look at just looked for what was in 003 matching - so that would have worked, not sure where the marcorgcode system preference came into plac
12:38 ashimema     so do you repeat $w or repate the full 773?
12:38 ashimema     which bug are you looking at now?
12:39 cait         no
12:39 cait         only the $w
12:39 cait         i am not looking at any bug
12:39 ashimema     I see
12:39 cait         i am not even sure which one you were talking about (thinking component parts?)
12:39 ashimema     component parts got me looking at the opposites again
12:39 ashimema     component parts is kinda easier
12:40 cait         actually I am not suer how common a repeatable $w would actually be (i know i said differently earlier, but was confusing it with $0)
12:40 cait         $0 = links to authorities, but Koha doesn't use that
12:43 ashimema     but the search from child to host should be the AND search right.. not a combined string
12:43 marcelr      keep it flexible ashimema
12:43 ashimema     that's the aim
12:43 marcelr      i was searching for either num and (code)num
12:44 ashimema     indeed
12:44 ashimema     but I think it should be
12:45 ashimema     `control-number=num` and `control-number=num and control-number-identifier=code`
12:45 ashimema     not `control-number=(code)num`
12:45 ashimema     does that make sense
12:45 marcelr      and what if you loose results now ?
12:45 ashimema     I don't think you will
12:45 marcelr      depends on data
12:45 ashimema     you think
12:46 marcelr      or at least ask
12:46 ashimema     my point is I don't think control number.. i.e. 001 ever includes 003 internally.
12:46 ashimema     I can ask
12:52 cait         ashimema: or between the combinations
12:52 cait         if you really want to deal with repeatalbes
12:52 ashimema     ?
12:53 cait         (cn-A and cni-A) or (cn-B and cni-B)
12:53 cait         if you have multiple $w we could do a search with or
12:53 ashimema     yikes..
12:53 ashimema     you are right
12:53 ashimema     thanks
12:53 cait         where we search the cni and number combined
12:54 cait         it probably helps we just had a boolean sql expression dispute here lol
12:54 cait         crazy_weeks++
12:54 * ashimema   goes back to contemplating whether this can be done in one search query instead of multiple
12:55 ashimema     (cn-A and cni-A) or (cn-B and cni-B) or cn-A or cn-B
12:56 ashimema     issue being how do we pick the correct match
13:02 marcelr      not sure if we are going in the right direction here
13:02 ashimema     go on
13:03 marcelr      lets see
13:03 marcelr      now you are pickign all $ws in the search too
13:03 marcelr      think this is really edge cases
13:03 ashimema     indeed
13:03 ashimema     that's where I struggle
13:03 ashimema     'how do we pick the correct match'
13:03 ashimema     the search is getting broader
13:03 marcelr      i used or same orgcode or no orgcode
13:04 ashimema     except as cait just highlighted.. orgcode isn't always at the system level.. it can be narrower at the branch level
13:05 marcelr      yeah even nicer
13:05 marcelr      a cataloger level would be nice too :)
13:05 ashimema     lol
13:15 cait         ashimema: i think there will only be one
13:15 cait         if you do the combined searches, one will be right, the other will yield no results
13:15 cait         you do a broad search, but you are still looking for ids
13:15 cait         each shoudl only match one record max
13:15 cait         and in a normal catalog, it will be one
13:15 cait         one is the "right one"
13:16 ashimema     okies
13:16 cait         so i think if we don't acutally "know" which one is the right orgcode - it can still work
13:17 cait         what we might want to do is tell koha if we use cni or not...
13:17 cait         because if we do a search for combined and uncombined at the same time that could yield some unexpected results
13:17 cait         (combined = cni + cn)
13:19 ashimema     indeed
13:21 marcelr      we could add some prefs lol
13:27 cait         either that or make guesses/assumptions :)
13:27 cait         actually... we removed the marcorgcode from w but have the 003
13:28 cait         so... we are a problem case
13:28 cait         that's why joonas accounted for that case in his components when i last checked
13:29 ashimema     or we continue to do what marcelr did and do a search for with and if it doesn't get anything fall back
13:29 Joubu        @later tell fridolin Hey your proposal is still empty! Should we postpone tomorrow's vote?
13:29 huginn`      Joubu: The operation succeeded.
13:29 ashimema     rather than us the OR and risk getting multiple hits
13:38 marcelr      ashimema: i would agree only with improvements ;)
13:39 ashimema     iv'e decided my brain hurts too much for this right now 😜
13:40 ashimema     I'll swing round some other time
13:40 marcelr      ashimema++
13:40 * ashimema   hopes 11175 is close enough to go through
13:40 marcelr      bug 11175
13:40 huginn`      Bug https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11175 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, joonas.kylmala, Signed Off , Show the parent record's component parts in the detailed views
13:41 marcelr      ah 40 qa follow-ups
13:41 marcelr      not much chance
13:42 ashimema     I ended up adopting it to help it get moving
13:42 marcelr      could you squash some stuff
13:42 marcelr      to make it more attractive to qa
13:42 ashimema     but it needed more work that I was comfortable with just making pqa
13:42 ashimema     Joubu was on the case working through it as a squashed set
13:42 ashimema     it's not too bad if you look at it as a whole
13:42 ashimema     i.e diff the result against master
13:43 ashimema     it would be the road to madness to look at the individual commits
13:43 marcelr      i love to qa patchsets that are a bit smaller
13:43 Joubu        lazy marcelr
13:43 ashimema     but I didn't want to loose all the authors by squashing in one
13:43 marcelr      you should be
13:43 marcelr      these authors have patches in, so no big deal?
13:44 ashimema     bug 26314 might be more up your street marcelr 😜
13:44 huginn`      Bug https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26314 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, martin.renvoize, Needs Signoff , "Volumes: show volumes" showing regardless of whether there are volumes linked to the record
13:44 ashimema     it all adds to overall stats 😉
13:44 marcelr      stats tell everything and nothing
13:45 marcelr      maybe i just should pick 11175 on friday
13:45 Joubu        are you looking for bugs that need love?!
13:45 ashimema     personally.. it makes a difference to my end of year report if I can say X commits of mine got in in the last year to the bosses 😉
13:45 Joubu        marcelr: https://link.infini.fr/koha_bz_rel_21_11_candidate
13:45 ashimema     nope
13:45 marcelr      ashimema: make sure it applies on friday
13:45 marcelr      i will squash it and add 10 followups
13:45 ashimema     don't worry too much
13:46 marcelr      just use git reset
13:46 ashimema     I've been flogging that horse for a while.. I know there are plenty in the queue to keep people busy 😉
13:46 ashimema     nice to see the flatpickr console issue pushed
13:46 ashimema     suppose I best get back to the request.tt bit of it some time soon
13:55 cait         marcelr: it's still their code
13:56 marcelr      did you look at that report?
13:56 cait         patches in or not... i don't think that's the point
13:56 marcelr      if  a report has 20-40 qa followups, then you know there is something wrong
13:56 cait         but the squash will not change the code
13:56 cait         :)
13:56 cait         just how it appears
13:57 marcelr      thats exactly the point
13:57 ashimema     in allot of cases it's simply that time has passed.. so lots of follow-ups are needed to catch up with current guidelines
13:57 cait         one of the issues, yes
13:57 cait         i am not against suqashing per se
13:57 cait         i just think that authorship is important
13:58 cait         so maybe some could be squashed if that helps with keeping that in mind
13:58 marcelr      qa team and rm may squash if they have good reasons to do so
14:00 cait         I just feel it's squishy... i think in copyright law you never lose authorship of wahtever, you just give away rights
14:01 cait         that's how i think about the code too - if authors agree you may, but I still don't really see a reason with git
14:01 marcelr      its interesting to be author of line A which was refactored in commit B, C, D and removed in E :)
14:01 * ashimema   wonders why we're debating this.. `git diff upstream/master` is enough to really easily see the diff over the whole patchest
14:02 marcelr      it makes your brain relax?
14:02 marcelr      lol
14:02 ashimema     personally I actually find it pretty helpful to be able to work backwards through a blame series to understand the authors intent
14:03 marcelr      yes, but that does not prevent the qaer from squashing afterwards
14:04 cait         blame = finding a bug later
14:04 cait         already pushed
14:04 cait         i am with Martin
14:04 cait         you can "squash" virtually with git easily, but you can never unsquash
14:04 marcelr      he's fighting for his patches :)
14:05 marcelr      dont worry
14:05 marcelr      ashimema: this is already part of the qa session haha -  how involved is the author?
14:07 ashimema     each commit has an explicit comment so is helpful in my mind.. but I'm not too worried really
14:07 huginn`      News from kohagit: Bug 28211: (QA follow-up) Test for hook calls properly <https://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=6c4fa7d82df150c11b35dc4c8a3a5f34e147198a>
14:07 huginn`      News from kohagit: Bug 28153: (follow-up) Ensure update is idempotent <https://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=c290ae7e0edf3f30241adb08ad222a6aa7ecb10c>
14:07 huginn`      News from kohagit: Bug 29240: Rename start_for with date_to <https://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=e6d635ec8630f943070e9e6fcdbebc5fe5ff10a4>
14:07 huginn`      News from kohagit: Bug 29240: (follow-up) Correct more instances <https://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=f3d0c08ce52c2a71c845cbc25eaf19cf208485f0>
14:07 huginn`      News from kohagit: Bug 29240: Centralise from/to handling <https://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=commitdiff;h=30196fcdf3f5d726ad79c4f8983b17e9ad06b46a>
14:07 ashimema     just imagine they might be helpful to someone trying to unravel in a years time 😉
14:08 ashimema     school run.. back in a bit
14:10 Joubu        I don't mind if each commit does something. But I don't like when things are added, modified, removed, added again
14:10 Joubu        commits like that should be squashed
14:10 Joubu        what I usually do on push
14:20 marcelr      Joubu++
14:20 Joubu        tcohen, ashimema, kidclamp: we need a desision on bug 28700
14:20 huginn`      Bug https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28700 major, P5 - low, ---, stalkernoid, In Discussion , "Unblessed" method in Object.pm has blessed values for keys in some cases
14:21 marcelr      you could also wonder about the following question: could this commit live on its own? and would we like that? but this applies to much more..
14:42 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D11_CPAN build #452: SUCCESS in 34 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D11_CPAN/452/
15:00 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_U20 build #213: SUCCESS in 51 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_U20/213/
15:07 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D10_My8 build #667: SUCCESS in 56 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D10_My8/667/
15:12 reiveune     bye
15:16 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D11 build #419: SUCCESS in 33 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D11/419/
15:24 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D9 build #1790: SUCCESS in 1 hr 15 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D9/1790/
15:34 koha-jenkins Yippee, build fixed!
15:34 wahanui      Congratulations!
15:34 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_U_Stable build #284: FIXED in 41 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_U_Stable/284/
16:33 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D12 build #40: ABORTED in 1 hr 11 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D12/40/
16:33 koha-jenkins Project Koha_20.05_D10 build #326: ABORTED in 1 hr 4 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_20.05_D10/326/
16:34 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master build #1778: ABORTED in 1 hr 4 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master/1778/
16:34 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D12 build #41: ABORTED in 59 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D12/41/
16:37 IGS          Yesterday I got SQL code that will show me a list of instances of local use.  The list shows me the item number, but that's not very helpful.  How can I get it to show me book titles and call numbers?
16:51 pastebot     "oleonard" at 127.0.0.1 pasted "IGS try this" (9 lines) at http://paste.koha-community.org/3582
16:59 IGS          Thank you, oleonard!
17:18 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D12 build #42: ABORTED in 42 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D12/42/
17:19 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master build #1779: ABORTED in 35 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master/1779/
21:35 koha-jenkins Project Koha_20.11_D10 build #149: ABORTED in 4 hr 15 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_20.11_D10/149/
22:20 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_U21 build #1: SUCCESS in 41 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_U21/1/
22:38 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_U_Stable build #285: SUCCESS in 58 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_U_Stable/285/