Time  Nick         Message
23:59 tuxayo       I would not have went through between 12 and 8 tickets compared to looking at the latest backport in 19.05.x, find it in 19.11.x, and begin from here.
23:59 tuxayo       If I would have started my maintenance only after the latest release v19.11.06.
23:56 hayley       what do you mean by a gap?
23:55 hayley       I'm not sure I totally understand
23:52 tuxayo       I wonder if that's not actually necessary to look before the latest release. To avoid having a gaps in the backporting.
23:52 tuxayo       > when I did oldoldstable I only considered patches from after the last release, but it's totally fine to look backwardds if you want to!
23:48 hayley       that's fine, I understand now! not a problem :)
23:48 tuxayo       I'm noting that. That will help when I hesitate for normal or minor bug.
23:48 tuxayo       > generally oldoldstable tries to only backported critical or major, as the goal is to protect the version and not really for enhancements, but everyone does it differently really
23:47 tuxayo       I would have missed some in my case. I just started from latest patch in 19.05.x, looked in the log of 19.11.x and I'm moving up to catch up
23:47 tuxayo       > when I did oldoldstable I only considered patches from after the last release, but it's totally fine to look backwardds if you want to!
23:45 tuxayo       yes, when 19.11 pushed a fair number of patches after 19.05 freezed.
23:45 tuxayo       > ahh are you looking at the patches from before the most recent release?
23:45 hayley       when I did oldoldstable I only considered patches from after the last release, but it's totally fine to look backwardds if you want to!
23:44 hayley       that's cool
23:44 hayley       sorry I didn't consider that
23:44 hayley       ahh are you looking at the patches from before the most recent release?
23:44 hayley       yes that's correct tuxayo
23:43 tuxayo       Unless I got mixed up, I'm only looking at patches from my upstream (19.11) to consider backporting to 19.05
23:43 tuxayo       > oldoldstable decides what goes in from oldstable
23:41 hayley       generally oldoldstable tries to only backported critical or major, as the goal is to protect the version and not really for enhancements, but everyone does it differently really
23:40 hayley       just a note about the rmaint, generally the patches that get backported cascade in a waterfall fashion, so stable decides what goes in from master, oldstable decides what goes in from stable, and then oldoldstable decides what goes in from oldstable, if that makes sense? obviously there are exceptions to that rule, like if the patch is for a specific version, or if you've chatted to someone about it, just thought I'd let you know in case someone hadn't :)
23:38 tuxayo       hayley: yup :)
23:37 hayley       hey tuxayo you around? :)
23:35 koha-jenkins Project Koha_19.05_D8 build #233: SUCCESS in 31 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_19.05_D8/233/
23:07 koha-jenkins Project Koha_19.05_D9 build #227: SUCCESS in 42 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_19.05_D9/227/
23:03 koha-jenkins Project Koha_19.05_U18 build #228: SUCCESS in 36 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_19.05_U18/228/
20:51 tuxayo       tcohen around?
20:38 cait1        the main reason will be that Koha deletes data if the fields are not in the framework
20:37 cait1        and people migrate from older systems... so the fields could be there
20:37 cait1        i think old data
20:35 caroline     I guess some ppl might have records with those fields, but even new installs?
20:34 caroline     Do you know of any reason we would still have them in the frameworks?
20:34 cait1        it's been a whlie
20:34 cait1        i think
20:34 cait1        yes, becasue they show
20:34 caroline     so you do translate them?
20:33 cait1        the German translation is outdated... so i have to get a bit creative sometimes
20:33 caroline     (wlol sorry!
20:33 cait1        hm i think doing my best to have it make sense
20:33 caroline     it's not in my french version either https://www.marc21.ca/M21/BIB/B036-01X.html
20:33 caroline     cait how do you translate deleted fields in pootle? Example https://translate.koha-community.org/fr_CA/marc21/translate/fr-CA-frameworks.po#filter=incomplete says Bib field 023 "STANDARD FILM NUMBER (VM) [DELETED]" it's not even in the historic section of http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd01x09x.html
18:59 cait         hm i think you get to use yml... for marc, but still use the po we have
18:56 cait         i think mostly for the other things like notices, and auth values
18:56 cait         for marc we already have files - not sure if they are converted
18:56 caroline     so installer.po files will be for MARC and authorised_values and things like that?
18:55 cait         another file for another task
18:55 cait         those are only for the installer
18:55 cait         no
18:55 caroline     are *installer.po supposed to replace staff-prog and opac-bootstrap and all those files?
18:54 cait         when you want to make the move he'd probably be happy to help
18:51 cait         but i am not sure about all the steps yet myself - i think we need bernardo to create files on pootle with the translations from the existing files
18:51 cait         possibly
18:51 ashimema     we might need a similar removal bug for fr-CA.. i'm not close enough to tell at this point
18:50 cait         but it sure does help to translate them
18:50 wahanui      oleonard: I forgot these
18:50 oleonard     wahanui: forget these
18:50 caroline     ah ok. too bad...
18:50 cait         it's not part of the releases
18:50 wahanui      I haven't seen 'these', ashimema
18:50 ashimema     seen these too caroline: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/showdependencygraph.cgi?id=24871
18:50 cait         and you have to submit them yourself as a patch
18:50 cait         at themoment it's only a help to translate the sql files
18:50 caroline     If it's on Pootle, does that mean we get to be able to use frameworks in more that 1 language?
18:50 cait         and then you can turn the downloaded files into a patch that will match the English ones
18:49 cait         download here: https://translate.koha-community.org/files/
18:49 cait         translate here: https://translate.koha-community.org/fr_CA/marc21/
18:49 cait         and in theory that shoudl give you perfect sql files
18:49 caroline     yeah, I've seen MARC stuff on pootle, that's why I was asking
18:49 cait         s
18:49 cait         hm, I've been asking because i use pootle for the framework
18:48 ashimema     I'd fix the SQL error as a patch to the SQL..
18:48 caroline     but it's not present in enghlish
18:47 caroline     sql error
18:47 cait         is it an sql error or a translation error?
18:47 caroline     yes
18:47 cait         caroline: are you using MARC21?
18:38 caroline     just noticed there is an error in the fr-CA authorities frameworks and I wondered if I should submit a patch with sql
18:38 caroline     are language-specific sql still what is used for translating frameworks?
18:06 huginn       tcohen: mtj was last seen in #koha 6 days, 13 hours, 42 minutes, and 21 seconds ago: <mtj> oops, sorry the Koha_20.05_D8 noise ^
18:06 tcohen       @seen mtj
17:33 ashimema     I thinks it was because I did a reply-all and totally missed that  the list was in the original email trail
17:30 caroline     It's the first time in 1 1#2 yrs I've seen an email from an actual koha-community member being blocked
17:30 caroline     ashimema are you on the koha-docs mailing list? your message was blocked, I don't know why
17:16 ashimema     oleonard++
16:50 oleonard     The good thing about writing a detailed test plan is finding the things you forgot to fix...
16:32 reiveune     bye
16:06 kohaputti    although, I mock the search thing but let me still try.
16:06 kohaputti    tcohen, ooh, I think that might be the issue then, not launching zebra server, let me see that first
16:00 koha-jenkins Project Koha_19.05_D9 build #226: SUCCESS in 43 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_19.05_D9/226/
15:56 tcohen       rememebr Search.t launches its own zebra server
15:56 tcohen       where are you adding the keyword?
15:45 tuxayo       Nice, I had never noticed it
15:45 tuxayo       > Git remote & branch
15:45 tuxayo       http://sandboxes.ptfs-europe.co.uk/create
15:37 kohaputti    no help :(
15:37 kohaputti    maybe I should try rebuilding zebra index...
15:32 kohaputti    $search_mod->mock( 'new_record_from_zebra', \&test_component_record_second );
15:32 kohaputti    my $search_mod = Test::MockModule->new( 'C4::Search' );
15:32 kohaputti    t::lib::Mocks::mock_preference( 'SearchEngine', 'Zebra' );
15:32 kohaputti    I did the following mocks:
15:31 kohaputti    do I need to mock this new zebra keyword somehow?
15:30 kohaputti    with intranet and opac the searches work
15:30 kohaputti    CCL parsing error (10014) Unknown qualifier ZOOM for query: (rcn='1234' and cni='FIRST') or rcn='FIRST 1234' at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Search.pm line 250.
15:30 kohaputti    I'm working on a patch that introduces new zebra search keyword ("cni") but in unit tests I get
15:21 ashimema     you should deffo try the branch checkout options.. they work very well :)
15:20 tuxayo       This is great!
15:20 ashimema     and.. as I have the keys to/maintain one of the sandboxes servers.. I can kinda checkout whatever I like on them ;)
15:20 koha-jenkins Project Koha_19.05_U18 build #227: FIXED in 38 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_19.05_U18/227/
15:20 wahanui      Congratulations!
15:20 koha-jenkins Yippee, build fixed!
15:20 ashimema     sandboxes can use a git branch from anywhere ;)
15:19 koha-jenkins Use '!koha-jenkins help' to get help!
15:19 koha-jenkins tuxayo did you mean me? Unknown command '🥳'
15:19 tuxayo       koha-jenkins: 🥳
15:19 tuxayo       I'm not sure you can use sandboxes for this bug. (patches aren't in bugzilla due to their size)
15:19 tuxayo       ashimema: «I could setup one or two sandboxes and just point the support guys at it»
15:17 koha-jenkins Project Koha_19.05_D8 build #232: FIXED in 33 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_19.05_D8/232/
15:17 wahanui      Congratulations!
15:17 koha-jenkins Yippee, build fixed!
15:17 ashimema     I'll raise it in tomorrows company meeting
15:16 ashimema     I tend to build pass 2 or more for any I fail.. it's sorta habit.. if I fail something I have to go hunt out at least one to pass to mentally fix my Karma ;)
15:16 cait1        ashimema: if you got a team.. want to set a time and date?
15:16 tuxayo       For such big changes doing that early in the cycle seems a good approach.
15:16 tuxayo       to me on that one.»
15:15 tuxayo       «early push and accompany it with a promise to fix the bugs that fall out throughout the cycle kinda feels like the sanest approach
15:15 ashimema     yeah... I've passed  a few since then and feel better now
15:15 ashimema     hehe
15:14 cait1        ashimema: read what you said earlier about FQA a lot... it just happens
15:14 cait1        :P
15:14 cait1        i am not going to tell ashimema, but usually i take your patches when i need to PQA on something
15:14 cait1        you need to be more confident
15:13 oleonard     An international simultaneous scrutiny of my patches? I'm going to take some heavy psychic damage from that :D
15:09 ashimema     in fact.. pretty sure I could get a team onboard with that.. I could setup one or two sandboxes and just point the support guys at it
15:08 ashimema     count me in one an hours trying to break the OPAC cait
15:08 ashimema     indeed
15:01 oleonard     I mean... If you're going to have to patch 18.11 too ashimema?
15:00 cait1        to see if any biggies turn up
15:00 cait1        just a group of people ... 1 hour and try to test as much as possible
15:00 cait1        we could also do this "hit it for one hour thing" i suggested in QA email
14:57 * ashimema   is just going to have to do his accessibility patches twice isn't he.. once for the customers branch and once for community at large..
14:55 oleonard     Yeah that's what I think too.
14:54 ashimema     kinda feels like the sanest approach to me on that one.
14:53 ashimema     I'd go so far as to request special treatment from the RM and just aim for an early push and accompany it with a promise to fix the bugs that fall out throughout the cycle
14:53 ashimema     mm.. scary one that
14:49 oleonard     In the OPAC
14:48 cait1        bootstrap 4?
14:48 cait1        oh1
14:48 cait1        is it "all of Koha" or a specific area?
14:48 cait1        so yours will also fill 90 minutes at least? :)
14:47 oleonard     cait1 I want to be more thorough with the test plan than "Test everything" but I'm not sure how specific I need to be.
14:45 cait1        btw.... slides for 90 minutes
14:45 cait1        what makes your test plan so bad?
14:44 cait1        it sounds very tempting
14:44 oleonard     cait1 we could trade and you could write my test plan instead... but I don't think you'd like my slides
14:42 ashimema     lol
14:42 cait1        (and try to avoid it)
14:42 cait1        and... if you can#t tell by this discussion... I have to make slides again
14:42 cait1        just to explin my logic
14:42 cait1        we also do "Notices and slips"
14:41 cait1        i don't want to make you unhappy
14:41 ashimema     no matter.. not worth spending much time on it to be honest
14:41 ashimema     can't say I've run into similar cases
14:40 cait1        ashimema: do you change it in other places too?
14:40 cait1        hm
14:40 cait1        and not sure if ti's more sane or not
14:40 ashimema     oh well
14:40 ashimema     I have a feeling I may be patching that locally then..or in the British English translations at least.
14:38 cait1        capitalization is different in German (of course)
14:38 cait1        at least that's my interpretation
14:38 cait1        we made it simply "first word"
14:37 cait1        ashimema: i think you'd do that, but we don't adhere to the title rules
14:37 cait1        oleonard: I also looked up your question from last week abotu the typo - but didn't have time to fully test it out
14:37 ashimema     anywho.. not worth arguing over
14:37 ashimema     I wouldn't write. "Dog + cat" for example.. I'd write "Dog + Cat"
14:36 ashimema     feel free to comment as such.. I didn't want to hold up QA based on my opinion
14:35 oleonard     I think the follow-up is correct
14:35 cait1        before or after?
14:33 oleonard     I think it's correct
14:31 * oleonard   looks
14:31 huginn       Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25545 normal, P5 - low, ---, nick, Passed QA , Invoice page - Adjustments are not included in the Total + adjustments + shipment cost (Column tax. inc.)
14:31 cait1        oleonard: do you have an opinion on bug 25545 follow-up?
14:28 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D9_My8 build #344: STILL UNSTABLE in 57 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D9_My8/344/
14:17 koha-jenkins Project Koha_19.11_D10 build #12: STILL FAILING in 4 min 41 sec: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_19.11_D10/12/
14:14 * ashimema   is still learning
14:13 ashimema     probably best to try tcohen first. although I have access I'm by no means as adept as tcohen yet
14:13 tcohen       kohaputti++
14:13 ashimema     kohaputti++
14:13 tcohen       but try with me first
14:13 tcohen       or ashimema or Joubu
14:13 kohaputti    ok, great
14:13 tcohen       that's me
14:13 kohaputti    tcohen, so you manage jenkins? Just wondering who to contact if I manage to get the server for this (I will know earliest tomorrow).
14:11 ashimema     * tcohen, you're a star
14:11 ashimema     tcohen, you're a start
14:11 tcohen       now that mtj's is down we don't get KTD built
14:10 tcohen       kohaputti ashimema Joubu I'm adding a cheap runner on behalf of Theke for the Gitlab tasks
14:07 Null404      oh okay
14:00 huginn       Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25545 normal, P5 - low, ---, nick, Signed Off , Invoice page - Adjustments are not included in the Total + adjustments + shipment cost (Column tax. inc.)
14:00 ashimema     cait.. I'm not sure I agree with your followup on bug 25545
13:49 kohaputti    tcohen, ok, that's perfect, I will see if I can arrange such server.
13:45 oleonard     ...provided the enhancement took GDPR in mind
13:44 oleonard     It would be a good enhancement to make it possible to see past messages since they're quite easy to delete
13:44 oleonard     Null404: No, when they are deleted they are deleted from the database
13:39 Null404      hi, is there any way to get a list of deleted Messages on Patron in KOHA ?
13:34 tcohen       so I guess a 40GB one would be find
13:34 tcohen       total
13:34 tcohen       kohaputti it is not using more than 20GB
13:32 tcohen       I'm running one of the normal tasks and see how much space is used
13:30 tcohen       I'm checking
13:30 tcohen       but it is normal to have 8/10 GB of docker images
13:30 tcohen       the kohaclone has shrunk
13:29 tcohen       docker images
13:29 kohaputti    tcohen, ^
13:03 ashimema     why dat...
13:03 ashimema     that's storage requirement is huge?
13:03 ashimema     blimey.. yeah..
13:03 kohaputti    what does jenkins store?
13:03 kohaputti    so much space
13:01 tcohen       x86_64, that's right
13:01 tcohen       60/80GB storage
13:01 kohaputti    and x86_64 I assume :)
13:01 tcohen       dual core, 4GB RAM,
13:00 kohaputti    tcohen, I'm checking if we can do anything at our library to help. Is the need more for availability of nodes, or for compute power? What would be the required specs for this server?
12:51 ashimema     I could perhaps buy a couple of pi's to devote to it if they've got the guys?
12:50 ashimema     how much grunt do Jenkins runners actually need tcohen
12:50 huginn       tcohen: The operation succeeded.
12:50 tcohen       @later tell mtj your node/runner is down
12:30 * Joubu      gives his body to Jenkins
12:19 ashimema     not entirely sure how to help there though :(.. we're already donating peoples and sandboxes at ptfs-e.. not sure I can work my magic to get any more donations at the minute
12:18 ashimema     agreed tcohen
12:17 ashimema     hahaha
12:15 oleonard     Haha sick burn... junkins. Take that Jenkins!
12:14 tcohen       #koha we need more junkins nodes
12:10 * oleonard   hides his filthy awful patches from ashimema
12:07 * ashimema   was aiming for a PQA spree.. but alas..
12:06 ashimema     '/me is reluctantly on an FQA spree it seems
12:03 ashimema     oh I see.. it's more of the method name issue than a logic problem
12:01 ashimema     back in my physics days i used to think in  fair few dimentions ;)
12:00 tcohen       ashimema can't you just think in more than 4 dimensions?
12:00 cait1        and forgot to change the item status
12:00 huginn       Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20168 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, oleonard, ASSIGNED , Update of the OPAC bootstrap template to bootstrap v4
12:00 oleonard     cait: I want to say Bug 20168 is ready for testing but if I do I have to write a test plan...
12:00 cait1        i guess if you overwrite the rules
11:58 ashimema     how can an item be on order and issued at the same time>
11:58 ashimema     am I missing something obvious..
11:27 wahanui      hi oleopard
11:27 cait1        hi oleonard
11:25 oleonard     Hi #koha
10:52 Joubu        but that could work
10:52 Joubu        yes, but it's not the right place imo
10:50 kohaputti    ^ this was the suggestions earlier I tried to explain...
10:49 kohaputti    now there is: /var/log/koha/${instance}/plack.log and /var/log/koha/${instance}/plack-error.log
10:48 kohaputti    so we could easily add the intranet and opac logs to that list
10:48 kohaputti    Joubu, debian/scripts/koha-plack lists the log files that need chown'ing and chowns those
10:47 kohaputti    but the intranet-error.log issue with wrong user, as well as the opac-error.log issue with wrong user still exists
10:47 Joubu        that only works for new instance creation ofc
10:47 Joubu        yes, it creates them with wrong user, but now (20.05) we have koha-create that will fix the permissions
10:46 kohaputti    I upgraded from some older koha version this installation, maybe the log files were not renamed
10:46 Joubu        at least it's how it's named in master
10:46 Joubu        it's z3950-error.log :)
10:45 kohaputti    apache creates intranet-error.log at least with the wrong user (root), it should be the koha-user since log4perl is used.
10:44 Joubu        both are created by apache if the files don't not exist.
10:44 wahanui      okay, kohaputti.
10:44 kohaputti    sru-apacher-error.log is also chowned as root
10:43 Joubu        kohaputti: I don't understand what you mean. But yes intranet-error.log has the same problm as opac-error.log
10:43 Joubu        thanks
10:41 ashimema     will do Joubu
10:41 kohaputti    sru-apacher-error.log is for z3950 daemon
10:41 kohaputti    intranet-error.log
10:41 Joubu        sru-apache-error.log?
10:40 kohaputti    ... under $koha_root/debian
10:40 kohaputti    templates/log4perl-site.conf.in:log4perl.appender.INTRANET.filename=__LOG_DIR__/intranet-error.log
10:40 kohaputti    it is defined here:
10:39 kohaputti    I wonder if sru-apache-error.log is correct either
10:39 Joubu        that should not be there I think
10:39 Joubu        I was not aware of that
10:39 kohaputti    I guess intranet-error.log should be there too
10:37 kohaputti    or just add the opac-error.log to debian/scripts/koha-plack list of files to fix
10:33 Joubu        yes definitely, I bet it's for the postinst script, but not 100% sure
10:31 kohaputti    well this one we can automate
10:31 cait         if we can't automate, we need to make it clear in the notes
10:31 cait         for non-dev users it can be quite a hurdle
10:30 kohaputti    just chown'd stuff and didn't think it could be fixed somewhere :D
10:30 Joubu        ashimema: could you follow-up on 22522 if it's clear for you what needs to be done?
10:29 kohaputti    oh, I got that error too
10:27 cait         thx!
10:26 Joubu        heh, that one
10:26 huginn       Bug 25284: blocker, P5 - low, ---, jonathan.druart, Pushed to master , Can't open /var/log/koha/kohadev/opac-error.log (Permission denied)
10:26 Joubu        cait: yes for an upgrade you may need to do it. I've asked a couple of hours ago on https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25284#c24
10:26 cait         failing to find the email
10:26 cait         Joubu: can you remind me of the bug number for the permission issue?
10:20 cait         we are updating our demo server - it serves as a first update test as well
10:19 cait         but you don't run koha-create on an update
10:19 Joubu        the permissions are set with koha-create, so you should not need to do it
10:12 cait         do i just need towswitch out the user for a normal package installation?
10:12 cait         thank you :)
10:10 Joubu        chown -R kohadev-koha:kohadev-koha /var/log/koha/kohadev
10:09 cait         now to fix the permission thing
10:09 cait         not sure why, but now it's ok
10:09 cait         ah ok, it took a second restart
10:09 wahanui      which OS are you using?
10:09 Joubu        which OS?
10:09 cait         i did
10:09 Joubu        restart all
10:09 cait         Setting up libcpan-meta-perl (2.150010-1) ...
10:09 Joubu        apt show libcpan-meta-perl must return 2.150010 (NOT 2.150005)
10:08 cait         hm it doesn't appear to fix things
10:07 cait         ok, i better add it, easy to test at least
10:07 cait         the subjects are not helpful, was just working through ml messages :)
10:07 Joubu        it is supposed to work, but someone just reported it
10:07 Joubu        see the ML
10:07 cait         Joubu: will that be auto-installed if you update from self-made packages? or should i add that for my sysadmi too?
10:06 Joubu        cait: apt install libcpan-meta-perl
10:06 ashimema     if you've rebased something ancient and effectively adopted it from the original author
10:06 ashimema     I've also used 'Rescued-by'
10:06 ashimema     Rebased-by seems a good trailer to me
10:05 cait         do we have a workaround for that yet?
10:05 cait         an't locate object method "phases" via package "CPAN::Meta::Prereqs" at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Installer/PerlModules.pm line 55
10:05 cait         tcohen: I have the broken about page in my kohadevbox
10:04 cait         hm and this 20.05 also has the broken about page
10:03 kohaputti    is using Rebased-by git-trailer ok? I see one other person using it, other people add a comment after sign-off about rebasing but I don't want to sign-off my rebase...
10:02 Null404      is there any way to get a list of deleted Messages on Patron in KOHA ?
10:02 wahanui      hey, Null404
10:02 Null404      hello
10:02 cait         it's all on the bug report
10:02 cait         and it was still broken
10:02 cait         then i  did a complete new installation
10:02 cait         i reported it on upgrade
10:01 ashimema     only for at install time
10:01 ashimema     I don't see a report for it at ugprade
10:01 cait         and yep, my new 20.05 is showing the issue too
10:00 cait         quite a while before release actually
09:58 cait         to be fair... i reported the file permission thing
09:54 ashimema     fair
09:53 kohaputti    we have quite a lot of QA going on before the package is pushed so testing might not be necessary
09:53 ashimema     it was just a suggestion ;)
09:52 ashimema     okies
09:52 ashimema     whereas at the moment I think we catch lots of people who don't really mean to be on that branch at all
09:52 Joubu        things we don't test in dev env
09:52 Joubu        what they report is mainly upgrade issues so far (memcached or plack not restart, updateDB that fails)
09:52 ashimema     but one would hope that some people actually deliberately use 'testing'
09:52 ashimema     well.. yes
09:51 Joubu        then they will get 20.05.06, when 20.11 will be out. And bugs will be reported 6 months later :)
09:50 ashimema     well.. we don't have a testing.. my suggestion is that we do
09:50 ashimema     ?
09:50 ashimema     you understand my rationale then kohaputti.. do you think that would be sane too
09:50 Joubu        but 20.05 is not supposed to be "testing"
09:49 ashimema     yeah.. `testing`.. that was the word I was looking for.. but my brain failed me
09:49 huginn       Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25526 major, P5 - low, ---, koha-bugs, Failed QA , Using Write Off Selected will not allow for a different amount to be written off
09:49 ashimema     cait, what would you do on bug 25526.. just obsolete the first patch and mark as NSO again?
09:49 Joubu        or I still don't understand :D
09:49 kohaputti    in debian terms latest would be testing
09:49 Joubu        it's just naming, in that case people just needs to track oldstable instead of stable
09:48 ashimema     then those really seeking "absolute latest at risk of bugs" can follow `latest` whilst the more causious can use `stable` to get.. "nearly latest code, but a bit more tested"
09:47 ashimema     `oldstable`, `stable`, `latest` might be a better terminology
09:47 Joubu        I don't understant
09:46 ashimema     whereas our current model.. the stable isn't necessarily entirely stable (I suppose it's feature stable, but it's not bugfree stable) at initial release
09:45 ashimema     by .06 the current release really should actually be 'stable' in real terms
09:45 ashimema     as opposed to .06 -> .00
09:45 ashimema     .12 -> .06
09:45 ashimema     sorry..
09:44 ashimema     it would.. except you'll be tracking upgrades from .06 -> .06
09:44 cait         ?
09:44 cait         if you track stableß
09:44 cait         but won't that have the same effect?
09:44 ashimema     oldstable, stable, something
09:43 Joubu        they should track using version number instead
09:43 ashimema     listings.. even
09:43 ashimema     I have sort of felt for a while that we should change those listsing
09:43 ashimema     yeah..
09:43 Joubu        so they get upgraded once it's released..
09:43 Joubu        the problem is that .list file that contain "stable"
09:43 * ashimema   decided he should try to catch up with jajm.. but instead of getting his first PQA of the month.. he added his first FQA instead :(
09:42 ashimema     grr..
09:42 ashimema     hopefully they're all people willing to live with a few bugs for a couple of months ;)
09:42 ashimema     but yeah.. I usually suggest people wait for a .03 or .04 for safety
09:41 ashimema     it'll certainly help flush bugs
09:41 ashimema     I was surprised to see people upgrading to a .00..
09:36 cait         it better not embarasses me! :)
09:36 cait         Joubu: i am going to use a 20.05 in a presentation to students next week
09:35 * kohaputti  notices "Edit record" in koha is slow to load
09:34 Joubu        So, everybody's upgrading to the newly released 20.05.00, what a good idea! :D
08:49 cait         i think i managed to rewrite my code, but still stuck on the rebase, have to testlater
08:49 cait         Joubu: that explains
08:40 Joubu        get_effective_issuing_rule vs get_effective_rule
08:40 Joubu        ha, it's only the "descriptions" that have not been adjusted
08:39 Joubu        cait: how that?
08:11 cait         it looks like we have still tests for it, but it's gone?
08:11 cait         hm i am working on changing some custom code using get_effective_issuing_rule for 20.05
08:04 koha-jenkins Project Koha_Master_D9 build #1362: STILL UNSTABLE in 46 min: https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D9/1362/
07:56 cait         kohaputti: exciting
07:46 kohaputti    we still get the UI stuff out of this even if someone would like to refactor it later to use DB linking
07:46 huginn       Bug http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11175 enhancement, P5 - low, ---, pasi.kallinen, Failed QA , Show the parent record's component parts in the detailed views
07:46 kohaputti    cait, good morning! I'm probably going to try rescue bug 11175 in it's original form, meaning displaying the list of links to 001+003 with Zebra and ES.
07:18 cait2        good morning #koha!
07:07 huginn       Joubu: The operation succeeded.
07:07 Joubu        @later tell mtj I've added you to the "default CC" for the packaging bugs on bugzilla ;)
06:46 wahanui      kia ora, alex_a
06:46 alex_a       Bonjour
06:36 reiveune     hello
06:10 davidnind    Joubu++
06:07 Joubu        will do!
06:07 huginn       davidnind: The operation succeeded.
06:07 davidnind    @later tell Joubu Could you run the meeting script to update for the next documentation meeting? Thanks!